Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable icare rebound tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 325-329

  Salim, Sarwat ^a   Du, Haiming ^a   Wan, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometer; Intraocular pressure; Rebound tonometer; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICE; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REBOUND TONOMETER; REPRODUCIBILITY; TONOMETER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORNEA; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84879152718     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237caa2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthal-mologica. 1957;134:221-242.
2. Dekking HM, Coster HD. Dynamic tonometry. Ophthalmo-logica. 1967;154:59-74.
3. Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EAH, et al. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthal Scand. 2006;84:206-209.
4. Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, et al. Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:185-188.
5. Lopez-Caballero C, Contreras I, Munoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with applanation tonometry. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82: 273-278.
6. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, et al. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:332-334.
7. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, et al. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:213-217.
8. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34-43.
9. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:592-596.
10. Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, et al. Clinical comparison of the ICare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:43-47.
11. Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, et al. The ICare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37:687-691.
12. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, et al. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 80-84.
13. Jorge JM, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Queiros A, et al. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:442-448.
14. Weinreb RN, Toris CB, Gabelt BT, et al. Effects of prostaglandins on the aqueous humor outflow pathways. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(suppl 1):S53-S64.
15. Harasymowycz PJ, Pappamatheakis DG, Ennis M, et al. Relationship between travoprost and central corneal thickness in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. Cornea. 2007;26:34-41.
16. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann appla-nation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:141-144.
17. Kaufman C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118-3121.
18. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Gilino J, et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4578-4580.
19. Moses RA, Liu CH. Repeated applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:89-91.
20. Sudesh S, Moseley MJ, Thompson JR. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993;71:185-188.
21. Recep OF, Hasiripi H, Vayisoglu E, et al. Accurate time interval in repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:603-605.
22. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:3-7.
23. Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualis C. Clinical comparison of PASCAL dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2007;8:694-699.
24. Avitabile T, Longo A, Rocca D, et al. The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurements by rebound tonometer (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248:585-591.