Intraocular pressure measurement - Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 2-6

  Schneider, Evelin ^a   Grehn, Franz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central corneal thickness; Dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TONOMETRY;

BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; CORNEA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 30344436327     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196655.85460.d6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1-30.
2. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1389-1392.
3. Li Q, Li M, Fan Z, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature and axial length on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2002;18:176-180.
4. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, et al. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1779-1788.
5. Kanngiesser HE, Nee M, Kniestedt C, et al. Simulation of dynamic contour tonometry compared to in-vitro study revealing minimal influence of corneal radius and astigmatism. The theoretical foundations of dynamic contour tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:E-Abstract 2641.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307-310.
7. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118-3121.
8. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic comtour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3790-3794.
9. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and its dependence on corneal hydration in human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1287-1293.
10. Wirthlin AC, Siganos DD, Papastergiou G, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry for IOP measurement after LASIK, a comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Synopsis of paper presented at DOC, Nurenberg 2002.
11. Duba I, Wirthlin AC. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measure measurements. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221:347-350.
12. Siganos D, Papastergiou G, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746-751.
13. Fresco BB. A new tonometer - the pressure phosphene tonometer: clinical comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2123-2126.
14. Hoffmann EM, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol. 2004;4:4.
15. Wang X, Shen J, McCulley JP, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK. CLAO J. 2002;28:136-139.
16. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration state. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004.
17. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:85-87.
18. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:592-596.
19. Stodtmeister R. Applanation tonometry and correlation according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:319-324.
20. Velten IM, Bergua A, Horn FK, et al. [Central corneal thickness in normal eyes, patients with ocular hypertension, normal-pressure and open-angle glaucomas - a study.] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218:466.
21. Ventura AC, Bohnke M, Mojon DS. Central corneal thickness in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:792-795.
22. Shah S. Accurate intraocular pressure measurement - the myth of modern ophthalmology? Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1364-1366.
23. Pillunat LE, Kohlhaas M. [Dresdner IOD Korrekturwert-Tabelle.] (Unpublished)
24. Marx W, Madjlessi F, Reinhard T, et al. [More than 4 years' experience with electronic intraocular needle tonometry.] Ophthalmologe. 1999;96:498-502.
25. Madjlessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T, et al. [Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular corneas. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry.] Ophthalmologe. 2000;97:478-481.