Changes in corneal biomechanics and applanation tonometry with induced corneal swelling

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 3207-3214

  Lau, William ^a   Pye, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CENTRAL CORNEAL RADIUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEA RESISTANCE FACTOR; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT CONTACT LENS; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ANTHROPOMETRY; BIOMETRY; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANTHROPOMETRY; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMETRY; CONTACT LENSES; CORNEA; CORNEAL EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960967904     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6754     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. International Standards Organization. ISO8612:2001(E): Ophthalmic Instruments-Tonometers. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office; 2001.
2. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367-408.
3. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767-772.
4. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:592-596.
5. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53: 34-43.
6. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:364-370.
7. Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;76:223-224.
8. Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM. Role of corneal biomechanical properties in applanation tonometry measurements. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:512-519.
9. Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure. J Biomech. 2008;41:1707-1713.
10. Hamilton KE, Pye DC. Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:445-450.
11. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Kotecha A, Brown M, Garway-Heath D. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry using a nonlinear finite element ocular model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:1628-1640.
12. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-155.
13. Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q, Parel JM. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:110-117.
14. McMillan F, Forster RK. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:420-424.
15. Moses RA. The Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958;46:865-869.
16. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, Pham N, Tran AQ. The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and Goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:451-456.
17. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:616-622.
18. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hali A, Lin C, Kam P, Ngyuen T. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:153-158.
19. Hamilton K, Pye D, Hua S, Yu F, Chung J, Hou Q. The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91: 1636-1638.
20. Oh JH, Yoo C, Kim YY, Kim HM, Song JS. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:371-375.
21. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
22. Luce DA. Methodology for corneal compensated IOP and corneal resistance factor for an Ocular Response Analyzer. Available at http://www.ocularresponseanalyzer.com/downloads/Luce-2006-1. pdf. Accessed May 26, 2010.
23. Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, Alldredge BR, Qualls C. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:463-470.
24. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:868-875.
25. Pinero DP, Alio JL, Barraquer RI, Michael R, Jimenez R. Corneal biomechanics, refraction, and corneal aberrometry in keratoconus: an integrated study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1948-1955.
26. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3026-3031.
27. Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1886-1891.
28. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:39-47.
29. du Toit R, Vega JA, Fonn D, Simpson T. Diurnal variation of corneal sensitivity and thickness. Cornea. 2003;22:205-209.
30. Holden BA, Mertz GW, McNally JJ. Corneal swelling response to contact lenses worn under extended wear conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:218-226.
31. Mandell RB, Fatt I. Thinning of the human cornea on awakening. Nature. 1965;208:292-293.
32. Ocular Response Analyzer's User Guide (Revision B). Depew, NY: Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Inc.; 2005.
33. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996;313:744.
34. Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research: guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:183-185.
35. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191.
36. O'Neal MR, Polse KA, Sarver MD. Corneal response to rigid and hydrogel lenses during eye closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:837-842.
37. Holden BA, Mertz GW. Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily and extended wear contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:1161-1167.
38. Smelser GK, Ozanics V. Importance of atmospheric oxygen for maintenance of the optical properties of the human cornea. Science. 1952;115:140-141.
39. Martin R, Izquierdo M, Saber A. Investigation of posterior corneal curvature in CL-induced corneal swelling. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:288-293.
40. Kikkawa Y, Hirayama K. Uneven swelling of the corneal stroma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1970;9:735-741.
41. Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE, Koch R, Spoerl E. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2472-2477.
42. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1532-1537.
43. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2005; 14:344-350.
44. Silverman RH, Patel MS, Gal O, et al. Effect of corneal hydration on ultrasound velocity and backscatter. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35:839-846.
45. Jaycock PD, Lobo L, Ibrahim J, Tyrer J, Marshall J. Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31: 175-184.
46. Grabner G, Eilmsteiner R, Steindl C, Ruckhofer J, Mattioli R, Husinsky W. Dynamic corneal imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:163-174.
47. He X, Liu J. A quantitative ultrasonic spectroscopy method for noninvasive determination of corneal biomechanical properties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5148-5154.
48. Dupps WJ Jr, Netto MV, Herekar S, Krueger RR. Surface wave elastometry of the cornea in porcine and human donor eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:66-75.
49. Hollman KW, Emelianov SY, Neiss JH, et al. Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope. Cornea. 2002;21:68-73.
50. del Buey MA, Cristobal JA, Ascaso FJ, Lavilla L, Lanchares E. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3199-3202.
51. Skaff A, Cullen AP, Doughty MJ, Fonn D. Corneal swelling and recovery following wear of thick hydrogel contact lenses in insulin-dependent diabetics. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:287-297.
52. Kotecha A, Oddone F, Sinapis C, et al. Corneal biomechanical characteristics in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1822-1828.
53. Sahin A, Bayer A, Ozge G, Mumcuoglu T. Corneal biomechanical changes in diabetes mellitus and their influence on intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50: 4597-4604.
54. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:715-719.
55. Meek KM, Leonard DW, Connon CJ, Dennis S, Khan S. Transparency, swelling and scarring in the corneal stroma. Eye. 2003;17: 927-936.
56. Goldman JN, Benedek GB, Dohlman CH, Kravitt B. Structural alterations affecting transparency in swollen human corneas. Invest Ophthalmol. 1968;7:501-519.