The Influence of Corneal Properties on Rebound Tonometry

Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 80-84

  Chui, Wan sang ^a   Lam, Andrew ^a   Chen, Davie ^a   Chiu, Roger ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PACHYMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THICKNESS; TONOMETER;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 37349001245     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.061     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kontiola A.I. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78 (2000) 142-145
2. Kontiola A.I., Goldblum D., Mittag T., and Danias J. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 73 (2001) 781-785
3. Kontiola A., and Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242 (2004) 3-7
4. Quigley H.A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996) 389-393
5. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 532-538
6. Kass M.A., Heuer D.K., Higginbotham E.J., et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 701-713
7. Landers J., Goldberg I., and Graham S.L. Analysis of risk factors that may be associated with progression from ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 30 (2002) 242-247
8. Liu J., and Roberts C.J. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 146-155
9. Luce D.A. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 156-162
10. Laiquzzaman M., Bhojwani R., Cunliffe I., et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34 (2006) 114-118
11. Kida T., Liu J.H., and Weinreb R.N. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 4422-4426
12. Kymionis G.D., Naoumidi T.L., Aslanides I.M., et al. Intraocular pressure measurements after conductive keratoplasty. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 171-175
13. Fernandes P., Diaz-Rey J.A., Queiros A., et al. Comparison of the ICARE rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25 (2005) 436-440
14. Lam A.K., and Douthwaite W.A. The corneal thickness profile in Hong Kong Chinese. Cornea 17 (1998) 384-388
15. Realini T., and Lovelace K. Measuring central corneal thickness with ultrasound pachymetry. Optom Vis Sci 80 (2003) 437-439
16. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
17. García-Resúa C., González-Meijome J.M., Gilino J., and Yebra-Pimentel E. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci 83 (2006) 102-107
18. Davies L.N., Bartlett H., Mallen E.A., and Wolffsohn J.S. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84 (2006) 206-209
19. Doughty M.J., and Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (2000) 367-408
20. Nakamura M., Darhad U., Tatsumi Y., et al. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 142 (2006) 332-334
21. Martinez-de-la-Casa J.M., Garcia-Feijoo J., Vico E., et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 113 (2006) 2156-2162
22. Lleo A., Marcos A., Calatayud M., et al. The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 86 (2003) 104-108
23. Feltgen N., Leifert D., and Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 85 (2001) 85-87
24. Stodtmeister R., Kron M., and Gaus W. IOP measurement and central corneal thickness. [letter]. Br J Ophthalmol 86 (2002) 120-121
25. Brusini P., Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M., et al. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 213-217
26. Herndon L.W. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17 (2006) 115-119
27. Martinez-de-la-Casa J.M., Garcia-Feijoo J., Castillo A., and Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4578-4580
28. Van der J., and Jansonius N.M. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25 (2005) 429-435
29. Abraham LM, Epasinghe NC, Selva D, Casson R. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists. Eye. In press.
30. Gonzalez-Meijome J.M., Jorge J., Queiros A., et al. Age differences in central and peripheral intra-ocular pressure using a rebound tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 1495-1500
31. Boote C., Dennis S., Newton R.H., et al. Collagen fibrils appear more closely packed in the prepupillary cornea: optical and biomechanical implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 2941-2948
32. Lam A.K.C., and Chen D. Pentacam pachometry: comparison with non-contact specular microscopy on the central cornea, and its inter-session repeatability on the peripheral cornea. Clin Exp Optom 90 (2007) 108-114