Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas

Cornea

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 313-318

  Rosentreter, André ^a   Athanasopoulos, Apostolos ^b   Schild, Andrea M ^a   Lappas, Alexandra ^a   Cursiefen, Claus ^a   Dietlein, Thomas S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

corneal pathologies; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Icare rebound tonometry; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA AXIAL LENGTH; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CORNEA RADIUS; CORNEA SCAR; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETER; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOCONUS; KERATOPATHY; KERATOPLASTY; MALE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REBOUND TONOMETER; SCAR FORMATION; TONOMETER; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84873897144     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318254a3fb     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 8612:2009: Ophthalmic Instruments - Tonometers. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office; 2009.
2. Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the eye care technology forum. Ophthalmology 1996;103:183-185.
3. Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:835-844.
4. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1-30.
5. Rosentreter A, Neuburger M, Jordan JF, et al. Factors influencing applanation tonometry - a practical approach [in German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2011;228:118-124.
6. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1987;94:871-874.
7. Lee RK, Fantes F. Surgical management of patients with combined glaucoma and corneal transplant surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003; 14:95-99.
8. Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, et al. Frequency and risk factors of intraocular pressure increase after penetrating keratoplasty [in German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2000;217:77-81.
9. Kontiola AI. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1997;93:265-276.
10. Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, et al. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1138-1141.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
12. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, et al. Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in penetrating keratoplasties [in German]. Ophthalmologe 2006; 103:773-776.
13. Moreno-Montañes J, Garcia N, Fernandez-Hortelano A, et al. Rebound tonometer compared with goldmann tonometer in normal and pathologic corneas. Cornea 2007;26:427-430.
14. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2156-2162.
15. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, et al. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1532-1537.
16. Kaufman HE, Wind CA, Waltman SR. Validity of Mackay-Marg electronic applanation tonometer in patients with scarred irregular corneas. Am J Ophthalmol 1970;69:1003-1007.
17. Bayer A, Sahin A, Hürmeric V, et al. Intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, and goldmann tonometry in keratoconic corneas. J Glaucoma 2010;19:540-545.
18. Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, et al. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1661-1665.
19. Abraham LM, Epasinghe NCR, Selva D, et al. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperience tonometrists. Eye 2008;22:503-506.
20. van der Jagt LH, Jansonius LM. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:429-435.
21. Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:833-835.
22. Munkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, et al. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:875-879.
23. Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, et al. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009;37:687-691.
24. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4578-4580.
25. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Saenz-Frances F, et al. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2009;18:49-52.
26. Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, et al. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008;17:43-47.
27. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, et al. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2006;15:213-217.
28. Rosentreter A, Jablonski KS, Mellein AC, et al. A new rebound tonometer for home monitoring of intraocular pressure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1713-1719.
29. Jorge JM, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Queiros A, et al. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008;17:442-448.
30. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, et al. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 2008;115:80-84.
31. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, et al. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye 2011;25:642-650.