Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 442-448

  Jorge, Jorge Manuel Martins ^a,c   González Méijome, Jose M ^a   Queirós, Antonio ^a   Fernandes, Paulo ^a   Parafita, Manuel A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Corneal biomechanics; Corneal thickness; Intraocular pressure; Ocular Response Analyzer; Rebound tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA THICKNESS; ECHOGRAPHY; EYE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL PROBE; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE CAVITY; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REBOUND TONOMETRY; TEMPORAL LOBE; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; AGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELASTIC TISSUE; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGING; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; ELASTIC TISSUE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149123724     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815f52b8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Browning AC, Bhan A, Rotchford AP, et al. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1395-1399.
2. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367-408.
3. Ehlers N, Hjortdal J. Corneal thickness: measurement and implications. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:543-548.
4. Jordan JF, Joergens S, Dinslage S, et al. Central and paracentral corneal pachymetry in patients with normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244: 177-182.
5. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:868-875.
6. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21: 228-235.
7. Luce D, Taylor D. Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer measures corneal biomechanical properties and IOP. Ocular Response Analyzer White Paper. Available at: http://www.ocularresponseanalyzer.com/downloads.html 2005; Accessed November 2006.
8. Grabner G, Eilmsteiner R, Steindl C, et al. Dynamic corneal imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:163-174.
9. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
10. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J, Queiros A, et al. Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1495-1500.
11. Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Fernandes P, et al. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:506-511.
12. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:3-7.
13. Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, et al. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:206-209.
14. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:142-145.
15. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, et al. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:781-785.
16. Fernandes P, Diaz-Rey JA, Queiros A, et al. Comparison of the ICare(R) rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25: 436-440.
17. Garcia-Resua C, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Gilino J, et al. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:102-107.
18. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4578-4580.
19. Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Fernandes P, et al. Technical note: accuracy and repeatability of a new portable ultrasound pachymeter. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:190-193.
20. Parafita M, Yebra-Pimentel E, Giraldez MJ, et al. Further information on the knowledge of topographical corneal thickness. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999;26:128-137.
21. Parafita MA, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Diaz-Rey JA, et al. Corneal thickness mapping by topographical ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Contact Lens Clin. 2000;27:12-21.
22. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Gonzalez-Perez J, Cervino A, et al. Changes in corneal structure with continuous wear of high-Dk soft contact lenses: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:440-446.
23. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Cervino A, Yebra-Pimentel E, et al. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:125-132.
24. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-155.
25. Herndon LW. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:115-119.