The role of productivity in improving the environmental sustainability of ruminant production systems

Annual Review of Animal Biosciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 469-489

  Capper, Judith L ^a   Bauman, Dale E ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

animal source foods; beef; carbon footprint; dairy; dilution of maintenance; greenhouse gas emissions

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CATERING SERVICE; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RUMINANT;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD SUPPLY; GLOBAL HEALTH; RUMINANTS;

EID: 84904467154     PISSN: 21658102     EISSN: 21658110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103727     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Food Agric. Organ. UN. 1996. Rome declaration on world food security and World Food Summit plan of action. Presented at World Food Summit, Novemb.13-17, Rome, Italy
2. Food Agric. Organ. UN. 2009. How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome, Italy: Food Agric. Organ.
3. Thornton PK. 2010. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.B Biol. Sci. 365:2853-67
4. Bauman DE, Capper JL. 2011. Future Challenges and Opportunities in Animal Nutrition. In 26th Southwest Nutrition & Management Conference, pp. 70-84. Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona
5. UN World Comm. Environ. Dev. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
6. United Nations. 2005. 2005 World Summit Outcome. New York: UN Publ.
7. Bellarby J, Foereid B, Hastings A, Smith P. 2008. Cool Farming: Climate Impacts of Agriculture and Mitigation Potential. Amsterdam: Greenpeace Int.
8. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 2010. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2008. Washington, DC: US Environ. Prot. Agency
9. Food Agric. Organ. UN. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Rome, Italy: Food Agric. Organ.
10. Goodland R, Anhang J. 2009. Livestock and Climate Change. What If the Key Actors in Climate Change Are... Cows, Pigs, and Chickens? Washington, DC: Worldwatch Inst.
11. Environ. Work. Group. 2011. Meat Eater's Guide to Climate Change and Health. Washington, DC: Environ. Work. Group
12. Pitesky ME, Stackhouse KR, Mitloehner FM. 2009. Clearing the air: livestock's contribution to climate change. Adv. Agron. 103:3-40
13. Herrero M, Gerber P, Vellinga T, Garnett T, Leip A, et al. 2011. Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: the importance of getting the numbers right. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 166/167:779-82
14. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P. 2010. Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000-2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:18371-74
15. Food Agric. Organ. UN. 2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment. Rome, Italy: Food Agric. Organ.
16. de Boer IJM. 2003. Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 80:69-77
17. Bertrand S, Barnett J. 2011. Standard method for determining the carbon footprint of dairy products reduces confusion. Anim. Front. 1:14-18
18. Voelker D. 1992. History of Dairy Recordkeeping. Ames, IA: Natl. Dairy Database
19. US Dep. Agric. 2012. Data and Statistics. Washington, DC: US Dep. Agric.
20. Shook GE. 2006. Major advances in determining appropriate selection goals. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1349-61
21. VandeHaar MJ, St-Pierre N. 2006. Major advances in nutrition: relevance to the sustainability of the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1280-91
22. Eastridge ML. 2006. Major advances in applied dairy nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1311-23
23. Kock RM, Algeo JW. 1983. The beef cattle industry: changes and challenges. J. Anim. Sci. 57:28-43
24. Corah LR. 2008. Development of a corn-based beef industry. J. Anim. Sci. 86:3635-39
25. Natl. Res. Counc. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
26. Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE. 2009. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2160-67
27. Capper JL. 2011. The environmental impact of United States beef production: 1977 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 89:4249-61
28. Place SE, MitloehnerFM.2010. Contemporary environmental issues: a review of the dairy industry's role in climate change and air quality and the potential of mitigation through improved production efficiency. J. Dairy Sci. 93:3407-16
29. Capper JL, Cady RA. 2012. A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey vs. Holstein milk for cheese production. J. Dairy Sci. 95:165-76
30. Bell MJ,Wall E, Russell G, Simm G, Stott AW. 2011. The effect of improving cow productivity, fertility, and longevity on the global warming potential of dairy systems. J. Dairy Sci. 94:3662-78
31. Garnsworthy PC. 2004. The environmental impact of fertility in dairy cows: a modelling approach to predict methane and ammonia emissions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 112:211-23
32. de Vries A, OvertonM, Fetrow J, Leslie K, Eicker S, Rogers G. 2008. Exploring the impact of sexed semen on the structure of the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 91:847-56
33. Benbrook C. 2009. Shades of Green: Quantifying the Benefits of Organic Dairy Production. Boulder, CO: Org. Cent.
34. Raab C, Grobe D. 2005. Consumer knowledge and perceptions about organic food. J. Ext. 43(4): 4RIB3. http://www.joe.org/joe/2005august/index.shtml
35. Rotz CA, Kamphuis GH, Karsten HD, Weaver RD. 2007. Organic dairy production systems in Pennsylvania: a case study evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3961-79
36. Sato K, Bartlett PC, Erskine RJ, Kaneene JB. 2005. A comparison of production and management between Wisconsin organic and conventional dairy herds. Livest. Prod. Sci. 93:105-15
37. Zwald AG, Ruegg PL, Kanenne JB, Warnick LD, Wells SJ, et al. 2004. Management practices and reported antimicrobial usage on conventional and organic dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 87:191-201
38. Thomassen MA, van Calker KJ, Smits MCJ, Iepema GL, de Boer IJM. 2008. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric. Syst. 96:95-107
39. Capper JL, Castañeda-Gutiérrez E, Cady RA, Bauman DE. 2008. The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 9668-73
40. US Dep. Agric./Natl. Agric. Stat. Serv. 2011. Livestock Slaughter Annual Summary. Washington, DC: US Dep. Agric.
41. Pelletier N, Pirog R, Rasmussen R. 2010. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the upper Midwestern United States. Agric. Syst. 103:380-89
42. Beauchemin KA, Janzen HH, Little SM, McAllister TA, McGinn SM. 2011. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada-evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 166/167:663-77
43. Notter DR, Sanders JO, Dickerson GE, Smith GM, Cartwright TC. 1979. Simulated efficiency of beef production for a Midwestern cow-calf-feedlot management system. II. Mature body size. J. Anim. Sci. 49:83-91
44. US Dep. Agric. 2009. Beef 2007-08. Part II: Reference of Beef Cow-Calf Management Practices in the United States, 2007-08. Fort Collins, CO: US Dep. Agric., Anim. Plant Health Insp. Serv., Vet. Serv., Cent. Epidemiol. Anim. Health, Natl. Anim. Health Monit. Syst.
45. Capper JL. 2012. Is the grass always greener? Comparing resource use and carbon footprints of conventional, natural and grass-fed beef production systems. Animals 2:127-43
46. Sithyphone K, Yabe M, Horita H, Hayashi K, Fumita T, et al. 2011. Comparison of feeding systems: feed cost, palatability and environmental impact among hay-fattened beef, consistent grass-only-fed beef and conventional marbled beef in Wagyu (Japanese Black cattle). Anim. Sci. J. 82:352-59
47. Post WM, Kwon KC. 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Glob. Change Biol. 6:317-28
48. Schlesinger WH. 2000. Carbon sequestration in soils: some cautions amidst optimism. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 82:121-27
49. West TO, Marland G. 2002. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 91:217-32
50. Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123:1-22
51. Bruce JP, Frome M, Haites E, Janzen H, Lal R, Pawtian K. 1999. Carbon sequestration in soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 54:382-89
52. Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET. 2001. Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol. Appl. 11:343-55
53. Pinares-Patiño CS, Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS, Hoskin SO. 2009. Effects of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 57:252-61
54. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2483-92
55. Ehui S, Li-Pun H, Mares V, Shapiro B. 1998. The role of livestock in food security and environmental protection. Outlook Agric. 27:81-87
56. Herrero M, Thornton PK, Gerber P, Reid RS. 2009. Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 1:111-20
57. Perry BD, Grace D, Sones K. 2011. Current drivers and future directions of global livestock disease dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA In press. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012953108
58. Kapan DD, Bennett SN, Ellis BN, Fox J, Lewis ND, et al. 2006. Avian influenza (H5N1) and the evolutionary and social ecology of infectious disease emergence. EcoHealth 3:187-94
59. Food Agric. Organ. UN. 2011. Rinderpest Eradicated-What Next? Rome, Italy: Food Agric. Organ.
60. World Organ. Anim. Health (OIE). 2008. Feeding the world better by controlling animal diseases. Paris: OIE
61. Food Agric. Organ. UN. 2009. FAOSTAT. Rome, Italy: Food Agric. Organ.
62. Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE. 2009. Demystifying the environmental sustainability of food production. In Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference, pp. 187-203. Syracuse, NY: Cornell Univ.
63. Roche JR, Berry DP, Kolver ES. 2006. Holstein-Friesian strain and feed effects on milk production, body weight, and body condition score profiles in grazing dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89:3532-43
64. Peters GM, Rowley HV, Wiedemann S, Tucker R, Short MD, Schultz MS. 2010. Red meat production in Australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:1327-32
65. Cederberg C, Persson M, Neovius K, Molander S, Clift R. 2011. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:1773-79
66. Beauchemin KA, Janzen H, Little SM, McAllister TA, McGinn SM. 2010. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: a case study. Agric. Syst. 103:371-79
67. Ogino A, Kaku K, Osada T, Shimada K. 2004. Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2115-22
68. Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE, Mogensen L. 2010. Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU. J. Clean. Prod. 18:756-66
69. Cederberg C, Sonesson U, Henriksson M, Sund V, Davis J. 2009. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Swedish Production of Meat, Milk and Eggs: 1990 and 2005. Gothenburg: Swed. Inst. Food Biotechnol.
70. Bertrand S, Barnett J. 2011. A common carbon footprint approach for dairy. Anim. Front. 1:14-18
71. Wandel M, Bugge A. 1997. Environmental concern in consumer evaluation of food quality. Food Qual. Prefer. 8:19-26
72. Bauman DE. 1992. Bovine somatotropin: review of an emerging animal technology. J. Dairy Sci. 75:3432-51
73. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 1999. U.S. Methane Emissions 1990-2020: Inventories, Projections, and Opportunities for Reductions. Washington, DC: US Environ. Prot. Agency
74. Natl. Res. Counc. 1994. Metabolic Modifiers: Effects on the Nutrient Requirements of Food-Producing Animals. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
75. Bosch DJ, Wolfe ML, Knowlton KF. 2006. Reducing phosphorus runoff from dairy farms. J. Environ. Qual. 35:918-27
76. Dunlap TF, Kohn RA, Dahl GE, Varner M, Erdman RA. 2000. The impact of somatotropin, milking frequency, and photoperiod on dairy farm nutrient flows. J. Dairy Sci. 83:968-76
77. Jonker JS, Kohn RA, High J. 2002. Dairy herd management practices that impact nitrogen utilization efficiency. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1218-26
78. Johnson DE, Ward GM, Torrent J. 1992. The environmental impact of bovine somatotropin use in dairy cattle. J. Environ. Qual. 21:157-62
79. Kuperis PA, Veeman MM, AdamowiczWL. 1999. Consumer's responses to the potential use of bovine somatotrophin in Canadian dairy production. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 47:151-63
80. Douthitt RA. 1995. Consumer risk perception and recombinant bovine growth hormone: the case for labeling dairy products made from untreated herd milk. J. Public Policy Mark. 14:328-33
81. Brinckman D. 2000. The regulation of rbST: the European case. AgBioForum 3:164-72
82. Cooprider KL, Mitloehner FM, Famula TR, Kebreab E, Zhao Y, Eenennaam V. 2011. Feedlot efficiency implications on GHG emissions and sustainability. J. Anim. Sci. 89:2643-56
83. MacArthur Clark JA, Pottera M, Hardinga E. 2006. The welfare implications of animal breeding and breeding technologies in commercial agriculture. Livest. Sci. 103:270-81
84. Fraser D. 2008. Toward a global perspective on farm animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 113:330-39
85. Anderson SA, Yeaton WooRW, Crawford LM. 2001. Risk assessment of the impact on human health of resistant Campylobacter jejuni from fluoroquinolone use in beef cattle. Food Contr. 12:13-25
86. Harrington LMB, Lu M. 2002. Beef feedlots in southwestern Kansas: local change, perceptions, and the global change context. Glob. Environ. Change 12:273-82
87. Lusk JL, Roosen J, Fox JA. 2003. Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdomand the United States. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85:16-29
88. Capper JL, Hayes DJ. 2012. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from United States beef production. J. Anim. Sci. In press
89. Misselbrook T, Powell JM, Broderick GA, Grabber JH. 2005. Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1765-77
90. Di HJ, Cameron KC. 2002. The use of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), to decrease nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions in a simulated grazed and irrigated grassland. Soil Use Manag. 18:395-403
91. Patra AK. 2012. Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184:1929-52
92. Beauchemin KA, Kreutzer M, O'Mara F, McAllister TA. 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48:21-27
93. McAllister TA, Newbold CJ. 2008. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48:7-13
94. Grainger CM, Beauchemin KA. 2011. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 166/167:302-20
95. Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M. 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4:351-65
96. Neumann C, Harris DM, Rogers LM. 2002. Contribution of animal source foods in improving diet quality and function in children in the developing world. Nutr. Res. 22:193-220
97. Murphy SP, Allen LH. 2003. Nutritional importance of animal source foods. J. Nutr. 133:3932S-35S
98. Randolph TF, Schelling E, Grace D, Nicholson CF, Leroy JL, et al. 2007. Invited review: role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries. Int. J. Anim. Sci.85:2788-800
99. Huth PJ, Fulgoni VL III, DiRienzo DB, Miller GD. 2008. Role of dairy foods in the dietary guidelines. Nutr. Today 43:225-34
100. Zanovec M, O'Neil CE, Keast DR, Fulgoni VL III, Nicklas TA. 2010. Lean beef contributes significant amounts of key nutrients to the diets of US adults: National Health and Examination Survey 1999-2004. Nutr. Res. 30:375-81
101. Drewnowski A. 2011. The contribution of milk and milk products to micronutrient density and affordability of the U.S. diet. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 30:422S-28S
102. Fulgoni VL, Keast DR, Auestad N, Quann EE. 2011. Nutrients from dairy foods are difficult to replace in diets of Americans: food pattern modeling and an analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006. Nutr. Res. 31:759-65
103. Ebringer L, Ferencik M, Krajcovic J. 2008. Beneficial health effects of milk and fermented dairy products-review. Folia Microbiol. 53:378-94
104. Elwood PC, Givens I, Beswick AD, Fehily AM, Pickering JE, Gallacher J. 2008. The survival advantage of milk and dairy consumption: an overview of evidence from cohort studies of vascular diseases, diabetes and cancer. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 27:723S-34S
105. Elwood PC, Pickering JE, Givens DI, Gallacher JE. 2010. The consumption of milk and dairy foods and the incidence of vascular disease and diabetes: an overview of the evidence. Lipids 45:925-39
106. Nierenberg D. 2005. Worldwatch Paper 171: Happier Meals: Rethinking the Global Meat Industry. Washington, DC: Worldwatch
107. Kramer KJ, Moll HC, Nonhebel S, Wilting HC. 1999. Greenhouse gas emissions related to Dutch food consumption. Energy Policy 27:203-16
108. Dutilh CE, Kramer KJ. 2000. Energy consumption in the food chain. J. Hum. Environ. 29:98-101
109. Reijinders L, Soret S. 2003. Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78:664S-68S
110. Carlsson-Kanyama A. 1998. Climate change and dietary choices-how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? Food Policy 23:277-93
111. Weber CL, Matthews HS. 2008. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:3508-15
112. Pimentel D, Pimentel M. 2003. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78:660S-63S
113. Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M. 2007. Evaluating the environmental impact on various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 61:279-86
114. Carlsson-Kanyama A, Gonzalez AD. 2009. Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 89:1704S-9S
115. Davis J, Sonesson U, Baumgartner DU, Nemecek T. 2010. Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: case studies in Spain and Sweden. Food Res. Int. 43:1874-84
116. Young VR, Pellett PL. 1994. Plant proteins in relation to human protein and amino acid nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 59:1203S-12S
117. Drewnowski A. 2010. The nutrient rich foods index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 91:1095S-101S
118. Fulgoni VL III, Keast DR, Drewnowski A. 2009. Development and validation of the nutrient-rich foods index: a tool to measure nutritional quality of foods. J. Nutr. 139:1549-54
119. Smedman A, Lindmark-Mansson H, Drewnowski A, Modin Edman A-K. 2010. Nutrient density of beverages in relation to climate impact. Food Nutr. Res. 54:1-8
120. Berners-Lee M, Hoolohan C, Cammack H, Hewitt CN. 2012. The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices. Energy Policy 43:184-90
121. Millward DJ, Garnett T. 2010. Food and the planet: nutritional dilemmas of greenhouse gas emission reductions through reduced intakes of meat and dairy foods. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 69:103-18
122. Wilkinson JM. 2011. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal 5:1014-22
123. Lubowski RN, Vesterby M, Bucholtz S, Baez A, Roberts MJ. 2006. Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002. Economic Information Bulletin Number 14.Washington, DC: US Dep. Agric./Econ. Res. Serv.