Incongruence among different mitochondrial regions: A case study using complete mitogenomes

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 314-323

  Meiklejohn, Kelly A ^a   Danielson, Melany J ^a   Faircloth, Brant C ^b   Glenn, Travis C ^c   Braun, Edward L ^a   Kimball, Rebecca T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Codon models; Galliformes; Mixture models; Noise reduction; Taxon sampling

Indexed keywords

CODON;

ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; DNA SEQUENCE; GALLIFORMES; GENETICS; MITOCHONDRIAL GENE; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; CODON; GALLIFORMES; GENES, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENOME, MITOCHONDRIAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84904409979     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Amaral F.R.D., Sheldon F.H., Wajntal A. Towards an assessment of character independence in avian RNA phylogenetics: a general secondary structure model for the avian mitochondrial 16S rRNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56:498-506.
2. Armstrong M.H., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Phylogenetic utility of avian ovomucoid intron G: a comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies in the Galliformes. Auk 2001, 118:799-804.
3. Barker F., Oyler-McCance S., Tomback D. Blood from a turnip: tissue origin of low-coverage shotgun sequencing libraries affects recovery of mitogenome sequences. Mitochondr. DNA 2014, 10.3109/19401736.19402013.19840588.
4. Berlin S., Ellegren H. Evolutionary genetics: clonal inheritance of avian mitochondrial DNA. Nature 2001, 413:37-38.
5. Berlin S., Smith N.G.C., Ellegren H. Do avian mitochondria recombine?. J. Mol. Evol. 2004, 58:163-167.
6. Boore J.L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27:1767-1780.
7. Botero-Castro F., Tilak M., Justy F., Catzeflis F., Delsuc F., Douzery E.J.P. Next-generation sequencing and phylogenetic signal of complete mitochondrial genomes for resolving the evolutionary history of leaf-nosed bats (Phyllostomidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69:728-739.
8. Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Polytomies, the power of phylogenetic inference, and the stochastic nature of molecular evolution: a comment on Walsh et al. (1999). Evolution 2001, 55:1261-1263.
9. Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Examining basal avian divergences with mitochondrial sequences: model complexity, taxon sampling, and sequence length. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:614-625.
10. Camacho C., Coulouris G., Avagyan V., Ma N., Papadopoulos J., Bealer K., Madden T.L. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:421.
11. Cannone J.J., Subramanian S., Schnare M.N., Collett J.R., D'Souza L.M., Du Y., Feng B., Lin N., Madabusi L.V., Müller K.M., Pande N., Shang Z., Yu N., Gutell R.R. The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 2002, 3:2.
12. Cao Y., Fujiwara M., Nikaido M., Okada N., Hasegawa M. Interordinal relationships and timescale of Eutherian evolution as inferred from mitochondrial genome data. Gene 2000, 259:149-158.
13. Castoe T.A., de Koning A.P., Kim H.M., Gu W., Noonan B.P., Naylor G., Jiang Z.J., Parkinson C.L., Pollock D.D. Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:8986-8991.
14. Cohen C., Wakeling J.L., Mandiwana-Neudani T.G., Sande E., Dranzoa C., Crowe T.M., Bowie R.C.K. Phylogenetic affinities of evolutionarily enigmatic African galliforms: the Stone Partridge Ptilopachus petrosus and Nahan's Francolin Francolinus nahani, and support for their sister relationship with New World quails. Ibis 2012, 154:768-780.
15. Corl A., Ellegren H. Sampling strategies for species trees: the effects on phylogenetic inference of the number of genes, number of individuals, and whether loci are mitochondrial, sex-linked, or autosomal. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 67:358-366.
16. Cox W.A., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Phylogenetic position of the New World quail (Odontophoridae): eight nuclear loci and three mitochondrial regions contradict morphology and the Sibley-Ahlquist tapestry. Auk 2007, 124:71-84.
17. Crowe T.M., Bowie R.C.K., Bloomer P., Mandiwana T.G., Hedderson T.A.J., Randi E., Pereira S.L., Wakeling J. Phylogenetics, biogeography and classification of, and character evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes): effects of character exclusion, data partitioning and missing data. Cladistics 2006, 22:495-532.
18. Degnan J.H., DeGiorgio M., Bryant D., Rosenberg N.A. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:35-54.
19. Delsuc F., Phillips M.J., Penny D. Comment on "Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?". Science 2003, 301:1482.
20. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 212:599-634.
21. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989, 5:164-166.
22. Goremykin V.V., Nikiforova S.V., Bininda-Emonds O.R. Automated removal of noisy data in phylogenomic analyses. J. Mol. Evol. 2010, 71:319-331.
23. Hackett S.J., Kimball R.T., Reddy S., Bowie R.C., Braun E.L., Braun M.J., Chojnowski J.L., Cox W.A., Han K.L., Harshman J., Huddleston C.J., Marks B.D., Miglia K.J., Moore W.S., Sheldon F.H., Steadman D.W., Witt C.C., Yuri T. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 2008, 320:1763-1768.
24. Kan X.Z., Yang J.K., Li X.F., Chen L., Lei Z.P., Wang M., Qian C.J., Gao H., Yang Z.Y. Phylogeny of major lineages of galliform birds (Aves: Galliformes) based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9:1625-1633.
25. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non-feathered facial traits. J. Avian Biol. 2008, 39:438-445.
26. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Does more sequence data improve estimates of galliform phylogeny? Analyses of a rapid radiation using a complete data matrix. PeerJ 2014, 2:e361.
27. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Zwartjes P., Crowe T.M. A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 11:38-54.
28. Kimball R.T., Mary C.M., Braun E.L. A macroevolutionary perspective on multiple sexual traits in the phasianidae (Galliformes). Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 2011:423938.
29. Kimball R.T., Wang N., Heimer-McGinn V., Ferguson C., Braun E.L. Identifying localized biases in large datasets: a case study using the avian tree of life. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69:1021-1032.
30. Kocher T.D., Thomas W.K., Meyer A., Edwards S.V., Pääbo S., Villablanca F.X., Wilson A.C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86:6196-6200.
31. Lartillot N., Philippe H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:1095-1109.
32. Lartillot N., Brinkmann H., Philippe H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 7:S4.
33. Lin Y.H., McLenachan P.A., Gore A.R., Phillips M.J., Ota R., Hendy M.D., Penny D. Four new mitochondrial genomes and the increased stability of evolutionary trees of mammals from improved taxon sampling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19:2060-2070.
34. Maddison, D.R., Maddison, W.P., 2005. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Available at: http://macclade.org.
35. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T., 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, pp. 1-8.
36. Miller J.M., Malenfant R.M., Moore S.S., Coltman D.W. Short reads, circular genome: skimming solid sequence to construct the bighorn sheep mitochondrial genome. J. Hered. 2012, 103:140-146.
37. Mindell D.P., Sorenson M.D., Dimcheff D.E. An extra nucleotide is not translated in mitochondrial ND3 of some birds and turtles. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15:1568-1571.
38. Moore W.S. Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees, a reply to Hoelzer. Evolution 1997, 51:627-629.
39. Moritz C., Dowling T.E., Brown W.M. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18:269-292.
40. Nabholz B., Jarvis E.D., Ellegren H. Obtaining mtDNA genomes from next-generation transcriptome sequencing: a case study on the basal Passerida (Aves: Passeriformes) phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57:466-470.
41. Naylor G.J.P., Brown W.M. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. Syst. Biol. 1998, 47:61-76.
42. Phillips M.J., Penny D. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 28:171-185.
43. Phillips M.J., Delsuc F., Penny D. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:1455-1458.
44. Phillips M.J., Gibb G.C., Crimp E.A., Penny D. Tinamous and moa flock together: mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:90-107.
45. Powell A.F.L.A., Barker F.K., Lanyon S.M. Empirical evaluation of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses of mitogenomic data: an avian case study. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66:69-79.
46. Pratt R.C., Gibb G.C., Morgan-Richards M., Phillips M.J., Hendy M.D., Penny D. Toward resolving deep Neoaves phylogeny: data, signal enhancement, and priors. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26:313-326.
47. Robinson D.F., Foulds L.R. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 1981, 53:131-147.
48. Russell R.D., Beckenbach A.T. Recoding of translation in turtle mitochondrial genomes: programmed frameshift mutations and evidence of a modified genetic code. J. Mol. Evol. 2008, 67:682-695.
49. Russo C.A., Takezaki N., Nei M. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13:525-536.
50. Sammler S., Bleidorn C., Tiedemann R. Full mitochondrial genome sequences of two endemic Philippine hornbill species (Aves: Bucerotidae) provide evidence for pervasive mitochondrial DNA recombination. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:35.
51. Sánchez-Garcia A., Castresana J. Impact of deep coalescence on the reliability of species tree inference from different types of DNA markers in mammals. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e30239.
52. Sanderson M.J., Wojciechowski M.F. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (leguminosae). Syst. Biol. 2000, 49:671-685.
53. Shen Y.Y., Liang L., Sun Y.B., Yue B.S., Yang X.J., Murphy R.W., Zhang Y.P. A mitogenomic perspective on the ancient, rapid radiation in the Galliformes with an emphasis on the Phasianidae. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:132.
54. Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution 1990, Yale University Press, New Haven.
55. Silvestro D., Michalak I. RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol. 2012, 12:335-337.
56. Sorenson M.D., Ast J.C., Dimcheff D.E., Yuri T., Mindell D.P. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 12:105-114.
57. Soria-Carrasco V., Talavera G., Igea J., Castresana J. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2954-2956.
58. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
59. Steel M. Should phylogenetic models be trying to "fit an elephant"?. Trends Genet. 2005, 21:307-309.
60. * and Other Methods). Version 4 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
61. Takezaki N., Gojobori T. Correct and incorrect vertebrate phylogenies obtained by the entire mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16:590-601.
62. Tourasse N.J., Gouy M. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997, 14:287-298.
63. Wang J., Wang W. A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6:1033-1038.
64. Wang N., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Liang B., Zhang Z. Assessing phylogenetic relationships among Galliformes: a multigene phylogeny with expanded taxon sampling in Phasianidae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e64312.
65. Weisrock D.W., Harmon L.J., Larson A. Resolving deep phylogenetic relationships in salamanders: analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genomic data. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:758-777.
66. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1586-1591.
67. Zerbino D.R., Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18:821-829.
68. Zhang P., Liang D., Mao R.L., Hillis D.M., Wake D.B., Cannatella D.C. Efficient sequencing of anuran mtDNAs and a mitogenomic exploration of the phylogeny and evolution of frogs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:1899-1915.
69. Zwickl D.J. Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion 2006, The University of Texas at Austin.
70. Zwickl D.J., Hillis D.M. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:588-598.