Streamflow simulation methods for ungauged and poorly gauged watersheds

Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1641-1661

  Loukas, A ^a   Vasiliades, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; FLOW MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RIVER BASIN; RIVER FLOW; STREAMFLOW; WATERSHED;

CANADA; CYPRUS; PAKISTAN;

EID: 84903974139     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-1641-2014     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abrahart, R. J., Anctil, F., Coulibaly, P., Dawson, C. W., Mount, N. J., See, L. M., Shamseldin, A. Y., Solomatine, D. P., Toth, E., and Wilby, R. L.: Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting, Prog. Phys. Geog., 36, 480-513, 2012.
2. Abrahart, R. J., See, L. M., Dawson, C. W., Shamseldin, A. Y., and Wilby, R. L.: Nearly two decades of neural network hydrologic modeling, in: Advances in Data-Based Approaches for Hydrologic Modeling and Forecasting, edited by: Sivakumar, B. and Berndtsson, R., World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 267-346, 2010.
3. Abrahart, R. J., Kneale, P. E., and See, L. M. (Eds.): Neural Networks for Hydrological Modelling, Taylor and Francis Group plc, London, UK, 2004.
4. Ahmad, Z., Hafeez, M., and Ahmad, I.: Hydrology of mountainous areas in the upper Indus Basin, Northern Pakistan with the perspective of climate change, Environ. Monit. Assess., 184, 5255-5274, 2012.
5. Anctil, F., Michel, C., Perrin, C., and Adreassian, V.: A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting, J. Hydrol., 286, 155-167, 2004a. (Pubitemid 38203954)
6. Anctil, F., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.: Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 357-368, 2004b. (Pubitemid 38285665)
7. Archer, D.: Contrasting hydrological regimes in the upper Indus Basin, J.Hydrol., 274, 198-210, 2003. (Pubitemid 36325946)
8. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology: Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 124-137, 2000.
9. Assaf, H.: Development of an energy-budget snowmelt updating model for incorporating feedback from snow course survey measurements, J. Eng. Comput. Architect., 1, 1-25, 2007.
10. Bao, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Fu, G., Wang, G., He, R., Yan, X., Jin, J., and Liu, H.: Comparison of regionalization approaches based on regression and similarity for predictions in ungauged catchments under multiple hydro-climatic conditions, J. Hydrol., 466-467, 37-46, 2012.
11. Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., Viglione, A., and Savenije, H. H. G. (Eds.): Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis across Processes, Places and Scales, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
12. Bocchiola, D., Diolaiuti, G., Soncini, A., Mihalcea, C., D'Agata, C., Mayer, C., Lambrecht, A., Rosso, R., and Smiraglia, C.: Prediction of future hydrological regimes in poorly gauged high altitude basins: the case study of the upper Indus, Pakistan, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2059-2075, doi:10.5194/hess-15-2059-2011, 2011.
13. Brath, A., Montanari, A., and Toth, E.: Neural networks and nonparametric methods for improving real-time flood forecasting through conceptual hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 627-639, doi:10.5194/hess-6- 627-2002, 2002.
14. Brath, A., Montanari, A., and Toth, E.: Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially-distributed hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 291, 232-253, 2004. (Pubitemid 38527207)
15. Burn, D. H.: Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach, Water Resour. Res., 26, 2257-2265, 1990. (Pubitemid 248509)
16. Cameron, D., Beven, K., Tawn, J., and Naden, P.: Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation (with likelihood based uncertainty estimation), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 23-34, doi:10.5194/hess-4-23-2000, 2000. (Pubitemid 30480601)
17. Cerda-Villafana, G., Ledesma-Orozco, S. E., and Gonzalez-Ramirez, E.: Tank model coupled with an artificial neural network, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 5317 LNAI, 343-350, 2008.
18. Chen, J. and Adams, B. J.: Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modelling, J. Hydrol., 318, 232-249, 2006. (Pubitemid 43120797)
19. Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., and Bobee, B.: Hydrological forecasting using artificial neural networks: The state of the art, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 26, 293-304, 1999. (Pubitemid 29475232)
20. Dai, H. C. and Macbeth, C.: Effects of learning parameters on learning procedure and performance of a BPNN, Neural Netw., 10, 1505-1521, 1997. (Pubitemid 28260900)
21. Dawson, C. W. and Wilby, R. L.: Hydrological modeling using artificial neural networks, Prog. Phys. Geog., 25, 80-108, 2001. (Pubitemid 33028258)
22. De Michele, C. and Salvadori, G.: On the derived flood frequency distribution: analytical formulation and the influence of antecedent soil moisture condition, J. Hydrol., 262, 245-258, 2002. (Pubitemid 34489895)
23. Druce, D. J.: Insights from a history of seasonal inflow forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 249, 102-112, 2001. (Pubitemid 32664998)
24. Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R. (Eds): Calibration of Watershed Models, American Geophysical Union, Water Science and Application, Vol. 6, Washinghton, DC, USA, 2003.
25. Efstratiadis, A. and Koutsoyiannis, D.: One decade of multiobjective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 58-78, 2010.
26. Elshorbagy, A., Corzo, G., Srinivasulu, S., and Solomatine, D. P.: Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology-Part 2: Application, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1943-1961, doi:10.5194/hess-14-1943-2010, 2010.
27. Engeland, K. and Gottschalk, L.: Bayesian estimation of parameters in a regional hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 883-898, doi:10.5194/hess-6-883-2002, 2002. (Pubitemid 36080699)
28. Fotakis, D., Sidiropoulos, E., and Loukas, A.: Integration of a hydrological model within a geographical information system: application to a forest watershed, Water, 6, 500-516, 2014.
29. Govindaraju, R. S. and Rao, A. R. (Eds.): Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2000.
30. Harlin, J.: Development of a process oriented calibration scheme for the HBV hydrological model, Nordic Hydrol., 22, 15-36, 1991.
31. He, Y., Bárdossy, A., and Zehe, E.: A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3539-3553, doi:10.5194/hess-15-3539-2011, 2011.
32. Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H. V., Hughes, D. A., Hut, R.W., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P. A., Uhlenbrook, S., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H. C., Woods, R. A., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C.: A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)-a review, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 58, 1198-1255, 2013.
33. Hrissanthou, V.: Comparative application of two mathematical models to predict sedimentation in Yermasoyia reservoir, Cyprus, Hydrol. Process., 20, 3939-3952, 2006. (Pubitemid 44883737)
34. Hudson, R. O. and Quick, M. C.: Component based water chemistry simulator for small subalpine watersheds, Can. Water Resour. J., 22, 299-325, 1997. (Pubitemid 127667651)
35. Iacobellis, V. and Fiorentino, M.: Derived distribution of floods based on the concept of partial area coverage with a climatic appeal, Water Resour. Res., 36, 469-482, 2000. (Pubitemid 30065543)
36. Jain, A., Maier, H. R., Dandy, G. C., and Sudheer, K. P.: Rainfall runoff modelling using neural networks: State of-the-art and future research needs, Indian Soc. Hydraul. J. Hydraul. Eng., 15, 52-74, 2009.
37. Juston, J., Seibert, J., and Johansson, P.-O.: Temporal sampling strategies and uncertainty in calibrating a conceptual hydrological model for a small boreal catchment, Hydrol. Process., 23, 3093-3109, 2009.
38. Kim, Y.-O., Jeong, D., and Ko, I. H.: Combining rainfall-runoff model outputs for improving ensemble streamflow prediction, J. Hydrol. Eng., 11, 578-588, 2006. (Pubitemid 44594110)
39. Kjeldsen, T. R. and Rosbjerg, D.: Comparison of regional index flood estimation procedures based on the extreme value type I distribution, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 16, 358-373, 2002. (Pubitemid 35240161)
40. Konz, M. and Seibert, J.: On the value of glacier mass balances for hydrological model calibration, J. Hydrol., 385, 238-246, 2010.
41. Koutsoyiannis, D.: Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: 2. Empirical investigation of long rainfall records, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 49, 591-610, 2004. (Pubitemid 38991003)
42. Liu, S., Xu, J.W., Zhao, J. F., and Li, Y.: A novel integrated rainfallrunoff model based on TOPMODEL and artificial neural network, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 423-426, 1405-1408, 2013.
43. Loukas, A. and Quick, M. C.: Precipitation distribution in coastal British Columbia. Water Resour. Bull., 30, 705-727, 1994.
44. Loukas, A. and Quick, M. C.: Spatial and temporal distribution of storm precipitation in southwestern British Columbia, J. Hydrol., 174, 37-56, 1995. (Pubitemid 26475072)
45. Loukas, A., Khan, M. I., and Quick, M. C.: Aspects of hydrological modelling in the Punjab Himalayan and Karakoram Ranges, Pakistan. Geophysical Research Abstracts 4, XXVII General Assembly of the European Geophysical Society, Nice, France, 2002.
46. Loukas, A., Vasiliades, L., and Dalezios, N. R.: Flood producing mechanisms identification in southern British Columbia, J. Hydrol., 227, 218-235, 2000. (Pubitemid 30104929)
47. Loukas, A.: Flood frequency estimation by a derived distribution procedure, J. Hydrol., 255, 69-89, 2002. (Pubitemid 34009830)
48. Maier, H. R. and Dandy, G. C.: The effect of internal parameters and geometry on the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study, Environ. Modell. Softw., 13, 193-209, 1998. (Pubitemid 28514818)
49. Maier, H. R. and Dandy, G. C.: Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications, Environ. Modell. Softw., 15, 101-124, 2000. (Pubitemid 30018318)
50. Maier, H. R., Jain, A., Dandy, G. C., and Sudheer, K. P.: Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resources variables: Current status and future directions, Environ. Modell. Softw., 25, 891-909, 2010.
51. Merritt, W. S., Alila, Y., Barton, M., Taylor, B., Cohen, S., and Neilsen, D.: Hydrologic response to scenarios of climate change in sub watersheds of the Okanagan basin, British Columbia, J. Hydrol., 326, 79-108, 2006. (Pubitemid 44183736)
52. Merz, R. and Blöschl, G.: Regionalisation of catchment model parameters, J. Hydrol., 287, 95-123, 2004. (Pubitemid 38300324)
53. Micovic, Z. and Quick, M. C.: A rainfall and snowmelt runoff modelling approach to flow estimation at ungauged sites in British Columbia, J. Hydrol., 226, 101-120, 1999. (Pubitemid 30028130)
54. Morrison, J., Quick, M. C., and Foreman, G. G.: Climate change in the Fraser River watershed: Flow and temperature projections, J. Hydrol., 263, 230-244, 2002. (Pubitemid 35211800)
55. Mount, N. J., Dawson, C.W., and Abrahart, R. J.: Legitimising datadriven models: exemplification of a new data-driven mechanistic modelling framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2827-2843, doi:10.5194/hess-17-2827-2013, 2013.
56. Naeem, U. A., Hashmi, H. N., Habib-ur-Rehman, and Shakir, A. S.: Flow trends in river Chitral due to different scenarios of glaciated extent, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 17, 244-251, 2013.
57. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part-1 A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
58. Nilsson, P., Uvo, C. B., and Berndtsson, R.: Monthly runoff simulation: Comparing and combining conceptual and neural network models, J. Hydrol., 321, 344-363, 2006.
59. Parajka, J., Viglione, A., Rogger, M., Salinas, J. L., Sivapalan, M., and Blöschl, G.: Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins-Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1783-1795, doi:10.5194/hess-17-1783-2013, 2013.
60. Perrin, C., Oudin, L., Andreassian, V., Rojas-Serna, C., Michel, C., and Mathevet, T.: Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall-runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52, 131-151, 2007. (Pubitemid 46210856)
61. Post, D. A. and Jakeman, A. J.: Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model, Ecol. Model., 123, 91-104, 1999.
62. Quick, M. C. and Pipes, A.: A combined snowmelt and rainfallrunoff model, Can. J. Civil Eng. 3, 449-460, 1976.
63. Quick, M. C., Loukas, A., and Yu, E.: Calculating the runoff response of the Wolf Creek watershed, Proceedings of the Workshop "Wolf Creek Research Basin: Hydrology, Ecology, Environment", Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada, 91-92, 1998.
64. Quick, M. C., Pipes, A., Nixon, D., Yu, E., Loukas, A., Millar, R., Assaf, H., and Start, B.: U.B.C. Watershed Model manual, Version 4.0, Mountain Hydrology Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 1995.
65. Quick, M. C.: The UBCWatershed Model, in: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by: Singh, V. P., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, 2012.
66. Razavi, T. and Coulibaly, P.: Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: review of regionalization methods, J. Hydrol. Eng., 18, 958-975, 2013.
67. Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R.: Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments, J. Hydrol., 480, 33-45, 2013.
68. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J.: Learning internal representations by error propagation, Parallel Distrib. Process., 1, 318-362, 1986.
69. Salinas, J. L., Castellarin, A., Kohnová, S., and Kjeldsen, T. R.: On the quest for a pan-European flood frequency distribution: effect of scale and climate, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 10, 6321-6358, doi:10.5194/hessd-10-6321-2013, 2013a.
70. Salinas, J. L., Laaha, G., Rogger, M., Parajka, J., Viglione, A., Sivapalan, M., and Blöschl, G.: Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins-Part 2: Flood and low flow studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2637-2652, doi:10.5194/hess-17-2637-2013, 2013b.
71. Schaefli, B. and Huss, M.: Integrating point glacier mass balance observations into hydrologic model identification, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1227-1241, doi:10.5194/hess-15-1227-2011, 2011.
72. Seibert, J. and Beven, K. J.: Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 883-892, doi:10.5194/hess-13-883-2009, 2009.
73. Shamseldin, A. Y., Nasr, A. E., and O'Connor, K. M.: Comparison of different forms of the Multi-layer Feed-Forward Neural Network method used for river flow forecasting, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 671-684, doi:10.5194/hess-6-671-2002, 2002.
74. Shamseldin, A. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Liang, G. C.: Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models, J. Hydrol., 197, 203-229, 1997. (Pubitemid 27335611)
75. Singh, P. and Singh, V. P.: Snow and Glacier Hydrology, Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
76. Singh, P. and Kumar, N.: Impact assessment of climate change on the hydrological response of a snow and glacier melt runoff dominated Himalayan river, J. Hydrol., 193, 316-350, 1997. (Pubitemid 27275284)
77. Singh, V. P. and Woolhiser, D.A.: Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology, J. Hydrol. Eng., 7, 270-292, 2002. (Pubitemid 34793868)
78. Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K. (Eds): Watershed Models, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, UK, 2005.
79. Singh, V. P.: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, 2012.
80. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S.W., Gupta, V. K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., Mcdonnell, J. J., Mendiondo, E. M., O'connell, P. E., . Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins, PUB, 2003-2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 857-880, 2003. (Pubitemid 37529254)
81. Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V. K., and Fulton, J. L.: Evaluation of maximum likelihood parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility, Water Resour. Res., 19, 251-259, 1983. (Pubitemid 14256109)
82. Srinivasulu, S. and Jain, A.: River flow prediction using an integrated approach, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14, 75-83, 2009.
83. Svensson, C., Kjeldsen, T. R., and Jones, D. A.: Flood frequency estimation using a joint probability approach within a Monte Carlo framework, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 58, 1-20, 2013.
84. Viglione, A., Parajka, J., Rogger, M., Salinas, J. L., Laaha, G., Sivapalan, M., and Blöschl, G.: Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins-Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2263-2279, doi:10.5194/hess-17-2263-2013, 2013.
85. Wagener, T. and Montanari, A.: Convergence of approaches toward reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins, Water Resour. Res., 47, W06301, doi:10.1029/2010WR009469, 2011.
86. Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis, Hydrol. Process., 17, 455-476, 2003. (Pubitemid 36234589)
87. Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in Gauged and Ungauged Catchments, Imp. Coll. Press, London, doi:10.1142/9781860945397, 2004.
88. Whitfield, P. H., Reynolds, C. J., and Cannon, A.: Modelling streamflow in present and future climates: example from the Georgia basin. British Columbia, Can.Water Resour. J., 27, 427-456, 2002.
89. Xia, Y. L., Yang, Z. L., Jackson, C., Stoffa, P. L., and Sen, M. K.: Impacts of data length on optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation of a land surface model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D07101, doi:10.1029/2003JD004419, 2004.
90. Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data, J. Hydrol., 181, 23-48, 1996.
91. Zhang, Y. and Chiew, F. H. S.: Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments, Water Resour. Res., 45, W07412, doi:10.1029/2008WR007504, 2009.