The fidelity of the ligation step determines how ends are resolved during nonhomologous end joining

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Waters, Crystal A ^a   Strande, Natasha T ^a   Pryor, John M ^a   Strom, Christina N ^a   Mieczkowski, Piotr ^a   Burkhalter, Martin D ^a   Oh, Sehyun ^b   Qaqish, Bahjat F ^c   Moore, Dominic T ^c   Hendrickson, Eric A ^b   Ramsden, Dale A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

8 HYDROXYGUANINE; DNA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; LIGASE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

CHEMICAL BONDING; CHROMOSOME; ENZYME ACTIVITY;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; GENE DELETION; GENE SYNTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IONIZING RADIATION; HCT116 CELL LINE;

DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; HCT116 CELLS; HUMANS;

EID: 84903971427     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5286     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. O'Driscoll, M. & Jeggo, P. A. The role of double-strand break repair-insights from human genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 45-54 (2006). (Pubitemid 41828947)
2. Lieber, M. R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 181-211 (2010).
3. Dobbs, T. A., Palmer, P., Maniou, Z., Lomax, M. E. & O'Neill, P. Interplay of two major repair pathways in the processing of complex double-strand DNA breaks. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7, 1372-1383 (2008).
4. Datta, K., Purkayastha, S., Neumann, R. D., Pastwa, E. & Winters, T. A. Base damage immediately upstream from double-strand break ends is a more severe impediment to nonhomologous end joining than blocked 30-termini. Radiat. Res. 175, 97-112 (2011).
5. Zhou, R.-Z. et al. Tolerance for 8-oxoguanine but not thymine glycol in alignment-based gap filling of partially complementary double-strand break ends by DNA polymerase lambda in human nuclear extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2895-2905 (2008). (Pubitemid 351737182)
6. Wang, Y., Lamarche, B. J. & Tsai, M.-D. Human DNA ligase IV and the ligase IV/XRCC4 complex: analysis of nick ligation fidelity. Biochemistry 46, 4962-4976 (2007). (Pubitemid 46682995)
7. Gu, J. et al. XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate incompatible DNA ends and can ligate across gaps. EMBO J. 26, 1010-1023 (2007).
8. Tsai, C. J., Kim, S. A. & Chu, G. Cernunnos/XLF promotes the ligation of mismatched and noncohesive DNA ends. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7851-7856 (2007). (Pubitemid 47185840)
9. Gu, J., Lu, H., Tsai, A. G., Schwarz, K. & Lieber, M. R. Single-stranded DNA ligation and XLF-stimulated incompatible DNA end ligation by the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex: influence of terminal DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 5755-5762 (2007). (Pubitemid 47506292)
10. Wu, X., Wilson, T. E. & Lieber, M. R. A role for FEN-1 in nonhomologous DNA end joining: the order of strand annealing and nucleolytic processing events. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1303-1308 (1999). (Pubitemid 29098446)
11. Wilson, T. E. & Lieber, M. R. Efficient processing of DNA ends during yeast nonhomologous end joining. Evidence for a DNA polymerase beta (Pol4)-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23599-23609 (1999).
12. Tseng, H.-M. & Tomkinson, A. E. Processing and joining of DNA ends coordinated by interactions among Dnl4/Lif1, Pol4, and FEN-1. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 47580-47588 (2004). (Pubitemid 39540903)
13. Moore, J. K. & Haber, J. E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 2164-2173 (1996).
14. Roth, D. B. & Wilson, J. H. Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells: role for short sequence homologies in the joining reaction. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 4295-4304 (1986). (Pubitemid 17217374)
15. Kabotyanski, E. B., Gomelsky, L. & Han, J. O. Double-strand break repair in Ku86-and XRCC4-deficient cells. Nucleic Acids (1998).
16. Guirouilh-Barbat, J., Rass, E., Plo, I., Bertrand, P. & Lopez, B. S. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20902-20907 (2007).
17. Ma, Y. et al. A biochemically defined system for mammalian nonhomologous DNA end joining. Mol. Cell 16, 701-713 (2004). (Pubitemid 39586529)
18. Budman, J. & Chu, G. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining by cell-free extract. EMBO J. 24, 849-860 (2005). (Pubitemid 40396113)
19. Feldmann, E., Schmiemann, V., Goedecke, W., Reichenberger, S. & Pfeiffer, P. DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 2585-2596 (2000). (Pubitemid 30420858)
20. Chen, S. et al. Accurate in vitro end joining of a DNA double strand break with partially cohesive 30-overhangs and 30-phosphoglycolate termini: effect of Ku on repair fidelity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24323-24330 (2001).
21. Willers, H. et al. Distinct mechanisms of nonhomologous end joining in the repair of site-directed chromosomal breaks with noncomplementary and complementary ends. Radiat. Res. 166, 567-574 (2006). (Pubitemid 44477709)
22. Nick McElhinny, S. A. et al. A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell 19, 357-366 (2005).
23. Kabotyanski, E. B., Gomelsky, L., Han, J. O., Stamato, T. D. & Roth, D. B. Double-strand break repair in Ku86-and XRCC4-deficient cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5333-5342 (1998). (Pubitemid 28542732)
24. Weigert, M. et al. The joining of V and J gene segments creates antibody diversity. Nature 283, 497-499 (1980). (Pubitemid 10142628)
25. Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910-918 (2013).
26. Guirouilh-Barbat, J. et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 14, 611-623 (2004). (Pubitemid 38744575)
27. Lieber, M. R., Lu, H., Gu, J. & Schwarz, K. Flexibility in the order of action and in the enzymology of the nuclease, polymerases, and ligase of vertebrate nonhomologous DNA end joining: relevance to cancer, aging, and the immune system. Cell Res. 18, 125-133 (2008).
28. Povirk, L. F. Processing of damaged DNA ends for double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. ISRN Mol. Biol. 2012, 1-16 (2012).
29. Bétermier, M., Bertrand, P. & Lopez, B. S. Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process? PLoS. Genet. 10, e1004086 (2014).
30. Waters, C. A., Strande, N. T., Wyatt, D. W., Pryor, J. M. & Ramsden, D. A. Nonhomologous end joining: a good solution for bad ends. DNA Repair (Amst.) 17, 39-51 (2014).
31. Tomkinson, A. E., Tappe, N. J. & Friedberg, E. C. DNA ligase I from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: physical and biochemical characterization of the CDC9 gene product. Biochemistry 31, 11762-11771 (1992).
32. Oh, S., Wang, Y., Zimbric, J. & Hendrickson, E. A. Human LIGIV is synthetically lethal with the loss of Rad54B-dependent recombination and is required for certain chromosome fusion events induced by telomere dysfunction. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1734-1749 (2013).
33. Gu, J. et al. DNA-PKcs regulates a single-stranded DNA endonuclease activity of Artemis. DNA Repair (Amst.) 9, 429-437 (2010).
34. Yannone, S. M. et al. Coordinate 50 and 30 endonucleolytic trimming of terminally blocked blunt DNA double-strand break ends by Artemis nuclease and DNA-dependent protein kinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3354-3365 (2008). (Pubitemid 351859004)
35. Breen, A. P. & Murphy, J. A. Reactions of oxyl radicals with DNA. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 18, 1033-1077 (1995).
36. Shibutani, S., Takeshita, M. & Grollman, A. P. Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG. Nature 349, 431-434 (1991). (Pubitemid 21926107)
37. Nussenzweig, A. & Nussenzweig, M. C. A backup DNA repair pathway moves to the forefront. Cell 131, 223-225 (2007). (Pubitemid 47576147)
38. McVey, M. & Lee, S. E. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 24, 529-538 (2008).
39. Johnson, R. E., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase. Poleta 283, 1001-1004 (1999).
40. Ochi, T., Gu, X. & Blundell, T. L. Structure of the catalytic region of DNA ligase IV in complex with an Artemis fragment sheds light on double-strand break repair. Structure 21, 672-679 (2013).
41. Shuman, S. Vaccinia virus DNA ligase: specificity, fidelity, and inhibition. Biochemistry 34, 16138-16147 (1995).
42. Pascal, J. M., O'Brien, P. J., Tomkinson, A. E. & Ellenberger, T. Human DNA ligase I completely encircles and partially unwinds nicked DNA. Nature 432, 473-478 (2004). (Pubitemid 39576523)
43. Cotner-Gohara, E., Kim, I.-K., Tomkinson, A. E. & Ellenberger, T. Two DNAbinding and nick recognition modules in human DNA ligase III. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10764-10772 (2008).
44. Bhagwat, A. S., Sanderson, R. J. & Lindahl, T. Delayed DNA joining at 30 mismatches by human DNA ligases. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4028-4033 (1999). (Pubitemid 29479029)
45. Wilson, S. H. & Kunkel, T. A. Passing the baton in base excision repair. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 176-178 (2000). (Pubitemid 30140755)
46. Mol, C. D., Izumi, T., Mitra, S. & Tainer, J. A. DNA-bound structures and mutants reveal abasic DNA binding by APE1 and DNA repair coordination [corrected]. Nature 403, 451-456 (2000). (Pubitemid 30073097)
47. Hammel, M., Yu, Y., Fang, S., Lees-Miller, S. P. & Tainer, J. A. XLF regulates filament architecture of the XRCC4.ligase IV complex. Structure 18, 1431-1442 (2010).
48. Perry, J. J. P., Cotner-Gohara, E., Ellenberger, T. & Tainer, J. A. Structural dynamics in DNA damage signaling and repair. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20, 283-294 (2010).
49. Ochi, T. et al. Structural insights into the role of domain flexibility in human DNA ligase IV. Structure 20, 1212-1222 (2012).
50. Tseng, H.-M. & Tomkinson, A. E. A physical and functional interaction between yeast Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 links DNA synthesis and ligation in nonhomologous end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45630-45637 (2002). (Pubitemid 36159174)
51. Malu, S. et al. Artemis C-terminal region facilitates V(D)J recombination through its interactions with DNA Ligase IV and DNA-PKcs. J. Exp. Med. 209, 955-963 (2012).
52. Chiruvella, K. K., Liang, Z., Birkeland, S. R., Basrur, V. & Wilson, T. E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV supports imprecise end joining independently of its catalytic activity. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003599 (2013).
53. Cottarel, J. et al. A noncatalytic function of the ligation complex during nonhomologous end joining. J. Cell Biol. 200, 173-186 (2013).
54. Roberts, S. A. et al. Ku is a 50-dRP/AP lyase that excises nucleotide damage near broken ends. Nature 464, 1214-1217 (2010).
55. Liang, F. & Jasin, M. Ku80-deficient cells exhibit excess degradation of extrachromosomal DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14405-14411 (1996). (Pubitemid 26190339)
56. Rothkamm, K. & Löbrich, M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low X-ray doses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5057-5062 (2003). (Pubitemid 36542657)
57. Riballo, E. et al. A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. Mol. Cell 16, 715-724 (2004). (Pubitemid 39586530)
58. Williams, D. A. Extra-binomial variation in logistic linear models. Appl. Stat. 31, 144 (1982).