Augmented reality and mobile learning: The state of the art

International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 43-58

  FitzGerald, Elizabeth ^a   Ferguson, Rebecca ^a   Adams, Anne ^a   Gaved, Mark ^a   Mor, Yishay ^a   Thomas, Rhodri ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Augmented reality (AR); Education; Mobile learning; Situated learning; State of the art; Taxonomy; Technology enhanced reality

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; TAXONOMIES;

LEARNING ACTIVITY; MOBILE LEARNING; SHARED EXPERIENCES; SITUATED LEARNING; STATE OF THE ART;

AUGMENTED REALITY;

EID: 84903150408     PISSN: 19418647     EISSN: 19418655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/ijmbl.2013100103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. Adams, A., Coughlan, T., Lea, J., Rogers, Y., Davies, S.-J., & Collins, T. (2011). Designing interconnected distributed resources for collaborative inquiry based science education. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Ottawa, Canada.
2. Adams, A., FitzGerald, E., & Priestnall, G. (2013). Of catwalk technologies and boundary creatures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(3), 15. doi:10.1145/2491500.2491503
3. Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321-334. doi:10.1080/07294360500284672
4. Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence (Cambridge, Mass.), 6(4), 355-385.
5. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47. doi:10.1109/38.963459
6. Benford, S., Seager, W., Flintham, M., Anastasi, R., Rowland, D., Humble, J., et al. (2004). The error of our ways: The experience of self-reported position in a location-based game. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2004), Nottingham, UK.
7. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts a social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195. doi:10.1177/0741088307313177
8. Blackboard. (2012). Blackboard launches augmented reality for mobile campus apps. Retrieved May 25, 2012, from http://www.blackboard.com/About-Bb/ News-Center/Press-Releases.aspx?releaseid=122627
9. Bligh, B., & Crook, C. (in press). Learning spaces: Departure points for a spatial turn in technology enhanced learning. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.), A reader in technology-enhanced learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces: Re-thinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. London, UK: Routledge.
12. Clough, G. (2010). Geolearners: Location-based informal learning with mobile and social technologies. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(1), 33-44. doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.39
13. Cook, J. (2010). Mobile phones as mediating tools within augmented contexts for development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(3), 1-12. doi:10.4018/jmbl.2010070101
14. Coulton, P., Lund, K., & Wilson, A. (2010). Harnessing player creativity to broaden the appeal of location-based games. In Proceedings of the the 24th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (BCS '10), Dundee, UK.
15. Cowan, P., & Butler, R. (2013). Making geography mobile: using location aware technology to improve student performance in physical geography. Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography, 1(2), 85-105.
16. Davies, S.-J., Collins, T., Gaved, M., Bartlett, J., Valentine, C., & McCann, L. (2010). Enabling remote activity: Using mobile technology for remote participation in geoscience fieldwork. In Proceedings of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2010 (EGU 2010), Vienna, Austria.
17. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://dx.doi.org/2010.1016/j.compedu.2012.2003.2002
18. Dourish, P. (2006). Re-spaceing place: "Place" and "space" ten years on. In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06), Banff, Alberta, Canada.
19. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Af-fordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7-22. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
20. Eddy, N. (2012). Google releases project glass images. Retrieved May 29, 2012, from http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/google-releases-project-glass- images-80115
21. Engelbart, D. C. (1988). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellect (Reprint). In I. Greif (Ed.), Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings (pp. 35-65). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
22. Epstein, M., & Vergani, S. (2006). History unwired: Mobile narrative in historic cities. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '06), Venezia, Italy.
23. FitzGerald, E. (2012a). Creating user-generated content for geolocated learning: An authoring framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 195-207. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00481.x
24. FitzGerald, E. (2012b). Towards a theory of augmented place. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 14(4), 43-45.
25. FitzGerald, E., Taylor, C., & Craven, M. (2013). To the castle! A comparison of two audio guides to enable public discovery of historical events. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17 (4), 749-760. doi:10.1007/s00779-012-0624- 0.
26. Futurelab. (2006). Mudlarking in Deptford: Mini report. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/project-re-ports/ mini-reports/mudlarking-mini-report.pdf
27. Gaved, M., Mulholland, P., Kerawalla, L., Collins, T., & Scanlon, E. (2010). More notspots than hotspots: strategies for undertaking networked learning in the real world. In Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn2010), Valetta, Malta.
28. Genco, A., Reina, G., Raccuglia, P., Santoro, G., Lovecchio, L., Sorce, S., et al. (2005). An augmented campus design for context-aware service provision. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM SIGUCCS Fall Conference (SIGUCCS '05), Monterey, CA.
29. Hamilton, K. E. (2012). Augmented reality in education. Retrieved January 11, 2013, from http://augmented-reality-in-education.wikispaces.com/
30. Harrison, S., & Tatar, D. (2008). Places: People, events, loci - the relation of semantic frames in the construction of place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 97-133. doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9073-0
31. Höllerer, T., Feiner, S., Terauchi, T., Rashid, G., & Hallaway, D. (1999). Exploring MARS: Developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Computers & Graphics, 23(6), 779-785. doi:10.1016/S0097-8493(99)00103-X
32. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The horizon report: 2011 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
33. Jones, D. (2011, September 21-22). An alternative (to) reality. In Proceedings of the Researching Learning in Immersive Virtual Environments (ReLIVE) Conference. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/31029/1/Jones-D-2011- An-Alternative-to-Reality.pdf
34. Kanjo, E., Benford, S., Paxton, M., Chamberlain, A., Stanton Fraser, D., & Woodgate, D. et al. (2008). MobGeoSen: facilitating personal geosensor data collection and visualization using mobile phones. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(8), 599-607. doi:10.1007/s00779-007-0180-1
35. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives - The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 203-228. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6
36. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Leach, M., & Benyon, D. (2009). Navigating a speckled world: interacting with wireless sensor networks. In P. Turner, S. Turner, & E. Davenport (Eds.), Exploration of space, technology and spa-tiality: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 26-39). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
38. Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Routledge.
39. Lin, C.-Y., Lin, C.-C., Chen, C.-J., & Huang, M.-R. (2012). Real-time interactive teaching materials for students with disabilities. In Y. Zhang (Ed.), Future communication, computing, control and management (Vol. 2, pp. 369-375). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27314-8-50
40. Luckin, R. (2008). The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 449-462. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.018
41. Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Oxon: Routledge.
42. Luckin, R., & Stanton Fraser, D. (2011). Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(5), 510-524. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2011. 042102
43. Martin-Gutierrez, J., Saorin, J. L., Contero, M., Alcaniz, M., Perez-Lopez, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2009.11.003
44. Meek, S., Priestnall, G., Sharples, M., & Goulding, J. (2013). Remote mobile capture of points of interest using line of sight modelling. Computers & Geosciences, 52, 334-344. doi:10.1016/j.ca-geo.2012.09.028
45. Mehigan, T. J. (2009). Harnessing accelerometer technology for inclusive mobile learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '09), Bonn, Germany.
46. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. A. (1994). Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IECE Transactions on Information and Systems (Special Issue on Networked Reality). E (Norwalk, Conn.), 77-D(12), 1321-1329.
47. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Proceedings of the Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Boston, MA.
48. Morrison, A., Oulasvirta, A., Peltonen, P., Lemmela, S., Jacucci, G., Reitmayr, G., et al. (2009). Like bees around the hive: A comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map. In Proceedings of the SIG-CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09).
49. Munnerley, D., Bacon, M., Wilson, A., Steele, J., Hedberg, J., & Fitzgerald, R. (2012). Confronting an augmented reality. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1-10. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19189
50. Núñez, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. F. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1-3), 45-65. doi:10.1023/A:1003759711966
51. Ordnance Survey. (2012). Accuracies (single GPS receiver). Retrieved May 29, 2012, from http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/gps/information/ gpsbackground/beginnersguidetogps/whatisgps-08.html
52. Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Enhancing students' understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159-191. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-2811-0
53. Pettit, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Going with the grain: Mobile devices in practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 17-33.
54. Priestnall, G., Brown, E., Sharples, M., & Polmear, G. (2010). Augmenting the field experience: A student-led comparison of techniques and technologies. In E. Brown (Ed.), Education in the wild: Contextual and location-based mobile learning in action (pp. 43-46). Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham: Learning Sciences Research Institute (LSRI).
55. Radford, L. (2005). Body, tool, and symbol: Semiotic reflections on cognition. In Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, Quebec, Canada.
56. Robinson, S., Eslambolchilar, P., & Jones, M. (2008). Point-to-GeoBlog: Gestures and sensors to support user generated content creation. In Proceedings of the 10th international Conference on Human Computer interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '08), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
57. Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 397-410. doi:10.1080/00313830600823753
58. Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, D. (2007). Experiences with handheld augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '07).
59. Schmitz, B., Klemke, R, & Specht, M. (2012, October 16-18). An analysis of the educational potential of augmented reality games for learning. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2012).
60. Sharples, M., Meek, S., & Priestnall, G. (2012). Zapp: Learning about the distant landscape. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2012).
61. Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Mobile augmented reality for learning: A case study. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), 117-127.
62. Sprake, J. (2012). Haptic referencing. In J. Sprake (Ed.), Learning-through-touring: Mobilising learners and touring technologies to creatively explore the built environment (pp. 149-183). SensePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-777-6-5
63. Squire, K. D. (2010). From information to experience: Place-based augmented reality games as a model for learning in a globally networked society. Teachers College Record, 112(10), 2565-2602.
64. Sutherland, I. E. (1968). A head-mounted three-dimensional display. In Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference of American Federation of Information Processing Societies (AFIPS), San Francisco, CA.
65. van der Linden, J., Braun, T., Rogers, Y., Oshodi, M., Spiers, A., McGoran, D., et al. (2012). Haptic lotus: A theatre experience for blind and sighted audiences. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference - Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12), Austin, TX.
66. Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54-75. doi:10.4018/jmbl.2009040104
67. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A., & Oppermann, R. (2007). An operational definition of context. In Proceedings of the Sixth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context, Roskilde, Denmark