Student-created independent learning modules: An easy high-value addition to radiology clerkships

Academic Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 879-887

  Naeger, David M ^a   Straus, Christopher M ^b   Phelps, Andrew ^a   Courtier, Jesse ^a   Webb, Emily M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Clerkships; ILM; Independent learning; Modules

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; ECHOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT LEARNING MODULE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION SAFETY; RADIOLOGY; SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING; TEACHER; EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; RADIOLOGY; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84902549197     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.024     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Means B., Roschelle J. An overview of technology and learning. International Encyclopedia of Education 2010, 1-10. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw (Eds.).
2. Lee S.W., Tsai C. Students' perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Comput Hum Behav 2011, 27(2):905-914.
3. Fu T., Tien F.F. The correlates of the digital divide and their impact on college student learning. Comput Educ 2008, 50(1):421-436.
4. Khogali S.E., Davies D.A., Donnan P.T., et al. Integration of e-learning resources into a medical school curriculum. Med Teach 2011, 33(4):311-318.
5. Ruiz J.G., Mintzer M.J., Leipzig R.M. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006, 81(3):207-212.
6. Solomon D.J., Ferenchick G.S., Laird-Fick H.S., et al. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Med Educ 2004, 29(4):27.
7. Kinkade S. A snapshot of the status of problem-based learning in U.S. medical schools, 2003-04. Acad Med 2005, 80:300-301.
8. Chan W.P., Hsu C.Y., Hong C.Y. Innovative "Case-Based Integrated Teaching" in an undergraduate medical curriculum: development and teachers' and students' responses. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008, 37(11):952-956.
9. Gunderman R.B., Gasparis P.T., Rahman T. Educating medical students about radiologists' contributions to patient care. Acad Radiol 2012, 19(7):908-909.
10. Chien A.T., Rosenthal M.B. Medicare's physician value-based payment modifier-will the tectonic shift create waves?. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(22):2076-2078.
11. Lee C.I., Enzmann D.R. Measuring radiology's value in time saved. J Am Coll Radiol 2012, 9(10):713-717.
12. Huang B.K., Lubner M., Resnik C.S. Balancing clinical service and education in the radiology residency. Acad Radiol 2009, 16(9):1161-1165.
13. Peets A.D., Coderre S., Wright B., et al. Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized cross-over study. BMC Med Educ 2009, 9:55.
14. Sobral D.T. Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Med Educ 2002, 36(11):1064-1070.
15. Issa N., Mayer R.E., Schuller M., et al. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Med Educ 2013, 47(4):388-396.
16. Gregory A., Walker I., McLaughlin K., et al. Both preparing to teach and teaching positively impact learning outcomes for peer teachers. Med Teach 2011, 33(8):e417-e422.
17. Dandavino M., Snell L., Wiseman J. Why medical students should learn how to teach. Med Teach 2007, 29(6):558-565.
18. Cornwall M. Students as teachers: peer teaching in higher education. Technical report 1979, 7906-8001. Centrum voor Onderzoek van Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs, University of Amsterdam, Heerlen.
19. Naeger D.M., Conrad M., Nguyen J., et al. Students teaching students: evaluation of a "near-peer" teaching experience. Acad Radiol 2013, 20(9):1177-1182.
20. Nelson A.J., Nelson S.V., Linn A.M., et al. Tomorrow's educators today? Implementing near-peer teaching for medical students. Med Teach 2012, 35(2):156-159.
21. Ten Cate O., Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach 2007, 29(6):591-599.
22. Lockspeiser Tm, O'Sullivan P., Teherani A., et al. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008, 13:361-372.
23. Ferguson K.J., Kreiter C.D. Assessing the relationship between peer and facilitator evaluations in case-based learning. Med Educ 2007, 41(9):906-908.
24. CM Straus, EM Webb, K Kondo, AW Phillips, DM Naeger, C Carrico, W Herring, J Neutze, R Haines, G Dodd. Medical imaging education: a summary and recommendations resulting from a National Survey of Medical School and Radiology Department Leadership. Submitted to J Am Coll Radiol.
25. Gunderman R.B., Seltman T.A. Engaging medical students as coeducators. Acad Radiol 2013, 20(8):1052-1053.
26. Slanetz P.J., Kung J., Eisenberg R.L. Teaching radiology in the millennial era. Acad Radiol 2013, 20(3):387-389.
27. O'Tuathaigh C.M., Duggan E., Khashan A.S., et al. Selection of student-selected component [SSCs] modules across the medical undergraduate curriculum: relationship with motivational factors. Med Teach 2012, 34(10):813-820.
28. Richardson J. Factors that influence first year medical students' choice of student selected component. Med Teach 2009, 31(9):e418-e424.
29. Halsted M.J., Perry L.A., Perry D.J., et al. Development of an interactive model for teaching emergency pediatric radiography: preliminary report. J Am Coll Radiol 2005, 2(8):701-703.
30. Gutmark R., Halsted M.J., Perry L., et al. Use of computer databases to reduce radiograph reading errors. J Am Coll Radiol 2007, 4(1):65-68.
31. Lieberman G., Abramson R., Volkan K., et al. Tutor versus computer: a prospective comparison of interactive tutorial and computer-assisted instruction in radiology education. Acad Radiol 2002, 9(1):40-49.
32. Leong S., Mc Laughlin P., O'Connor O.J., et al. An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students. J Am Coll Radiol 2012, 9(3):203-209.
33. Khalil M.K., Nelson L.D., Kibble J.D. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 2010, 3(5):219-226.
34. Khalil M.K., Lamar C.H., Johnson T.E. Using computer-based interactive imagery strategies for designing instructional anatomy programs. Clin Anat 2005, 18(1):68-76.
35. Gomersall C.D., Lam P., Joynt G.M. Electronic interactive learning to supplement acute care teaching. Med Educ 2010, 44(5):526.
36. Gjerde C.L., Xakellis G.C., Schuldt S.S. Medical student evaluation of self-selected learning modules. Fam Med 1993, 25(7):452-455.