Using computer-based interactive imagery strategies for designing instructional anatomy programs

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 68-76

  Khalil, Mohammed K ^a   Lamar, C H ^b   Johnson, T E ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy education; Computer based learning; Imagery strategy

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; EVALUATION; IMAGERY; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; TEACHING;

ADULT; ANATOMY; ANIMALS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DOGS; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SKULL; STUDENTS;

EID: 11144298916     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20049     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen GA, Worth ER, Hardin LE. 1999. An internet-supported delivery system for basic science education. J Vet Med Educ 25:24-28.
2. Barco T, Gilbertson B, Coutlas J. 2000. Web-delivery of anatomy video clips using a CD-ROM. Anat Rec 261:78-82.
3. Betrancourt M, Bisseret A. 1998. Integrating textual and pictorial information via pop-up windows: An experimental study. Behav Inf Technol 17:263-273.
4. Cairncross S, Mannion M. 2001. Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits. Innov Educ Teach Inter 38:156-164.
5. Carmichael SW, Pawlina W. 2000. Animated PowerPoint as a tool to teach anatomy. Anat Rec 261:83-88.
6. Collins TJ, Given RL, Hulsebosch CE, Miller BT. 1994. Status of gross anatomy in the U.S. and Canada: Dilemma for the 21st century. Clin Anat 7:275-296.
7. Dwyer FM, Lamberski RJ. 1983. A review of the research on the effects of the use of color in the teaching-learning process. Int J Instr Media 10:303-327.
8. Ertmer PA, Newby TJ. 1996. The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instr Sci 24:1-24.
9. Fukuoka W, Kojima Y, Spyridakis JH. 1999. Illustration in user manuals: preference and effectiveness with Japanese and American readers. Tech Commun 46:167-176.
10. Garg A, Norman GR, Spero L, Maheshwari P. 1999. Evaluation of technology-enhanced education: Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Acad Med 74:87-89.
11. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. 2001. How medical students learn spatial anatomy? Lancet 357:363-364.
12. Gyselinck V, Ehrlich MF, Cornoldi C, de Beni R, Dubois V. 2000. Visuospatial working memory in learning from multimedia systems. J Comput Assist Learn 16:166-176.
13. Gyselinck V, Tardieu H. 1999. The role of illustration in text comprehension: what, when, for whom, and why? In: Goldman SR, Van Oostendorp H, editors. The construction of mental representation during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p 195-218.
14. Jones NA, Olafson RP, Sutin J. 1978. Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection. J Med Educ 53:198-205.
15. Khadra MH, Guinea AI, Hill DA. 1995. The acceptance of computer-assisted learning by medical students. Aust N Z J Surg 65:610-612.
16. Levine MG, Stempak J, Conyers G, Walters JA. 1999. Implementing and integrating computer-based activities into problem-based gross anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat 12:191-198.
17. Mayer RE, Gallini JK. 1990. When is illustration worth ten thousand words? J Educ Psychol 82:715-726.
18. Mayer RE, Sims V. 1994. For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extension of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. J Educ Psychol 86:389-401.
19. Molitor S, Ballsteadt SP, Mandl H. 1989. Problems in knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. In: Mandl H, Levin R, editors. Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Advances in psychology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland/Elsevier Science Publisher, p 3-35.
20. Provo JA, Lamar CH, Bill RL. 1996. Increasing student-centered learning opportunities in a veterinary comparative anatomy course. J Vet Med Educ 23:16-20.
21. Walsh RJ, Bohn RC. 1990. Computer-assisted instruction: a role in teaching human gross anatomy. Med Educ 24:499-506.
22. Weidenmann B. 1994. Codes of instructional pictures. In: Schnoz W, Kulhavy W, editors. Comprehension of graphics. Advances in psychology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland/Elsevier Science Publisher, p 29-42.
23. West CK, Farmer JA, Wolff PM. 1991. Instructional design: implication from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, p 170-187.
24. Worley GM, Moore DM. 2001. The effect of highlight color on immediate recall on subjects of different cognitive styles. Int J Instr Media 28:169-180.
25. Zirkel JB, Zirkel PA. 1997. Technological alternatives to actual dissection in anatomy instruction: a review of the research. Educ Tech Nov/Dec:52-56.