Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on diabetes patients' acceptance of Internet-based interventions for depression: A randomized controlled trial

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 30-39

  Baumeister, H ^a,b   Nowoczin, L ^a   Lin, J ^a,b   Seifferth, H ^a   Seufert, J ^c   Laubner, K ^c   Ebert, D D ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^e PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Depression; Diabetes; E health; Psychotherapy

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE FACILITATING INTERVENTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERNET BASED INTERVENTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROBLEM AREAS IN DIABETES SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CENTER; SOCIAL ASPECT; ANXIETY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EXPECTANCY; INTERNET; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

ACCEPTANCE; DEPRESSION; DIABETES; E-HEALTH; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

ANXIETY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84902546080     PISSN: 01688227     EISSN: 18728227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Lin E.H., Korff M.v., Alonso J., Angermeyer M.C., Anthony J., Bromet E., et al. Mental disorders among persons with diabetes - results from the World Mental Health Surveys. J Psychosom Res 2008, 65:571-580.
2. Baumeister H., Kriston L., Bengel J., Härter M. High agreement of self-report and physician-diagnosed somatic conditions yields limited bias in examining mental-physical comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:558-565.
3. Park M., Katon W.J., Wolf F.M. Depression and risk of mortality in individuals with diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013, 35:217-225.
4. Groot M.de, Anderson R., Freedland K.E., Clouse R.E., Lustman P.J. Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2001, 63:619-630.
5. Hutter N., Schnurr A., Baumeister H. Healthcare costs in patients with diabetes mellitus and comorbid mental disorders - a systematic review. Diabetologia 2010, 53:2470-2479.
6. Baumeister H., Hutter N., Bengel J., Härter M. Quality of life in medically ill persons with comorbid mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 2011, 80:275-286.
7. Baumeister H., Hutter N., Bengel J. Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with diabetes mellitus and depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 12:CD008381.
8. Baumeister H., Hutter N. Collaborative care for depression in medically ill patients. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012, 25:405-414.
9. Baumeister H. Inappropriate prescriptions of antidepressant drugs in patients with subthreshold to mild depression: time for the evidence to become practice. J Affect Dis 2012, 139:240-243.
10. NICE. Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: treatment and management; available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG91.
11. Richards D., Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2012, 32:329-342.
12. Nobis S., Lehr D., Ebert D.D., Berking M., Heber E., Baumeister H., et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based intervention with mobile phone support to treat depressive symptoms in adults with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:306.
13. van Bastelaar K.M.P., Pouwer F., Cuijpers P., Riper H., Snoek F.J. Web-based depression treatment for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2011, 34:320-325.
14. Lin J., Ebert D., Lehr D., Berking M., Baumeister H. Internet based cognitive behavioral interventions: state of the art and implementation possibilities in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2013, 52:155-163. [German].
15. Crutzen R., Nooijer J.de, Brouwer W., Oenema A., Brug J., de Vries, et al. Strategies to facilitate exposure to internet-delivered health behavior change interventions aimed at adolescents or young adults: a systematic review. Health Educ Behav 2011, 38:49-62.
16. Kaltenthaler E., Sutcliffe P., Parry G., Beverley C., Rees A., Ferriter M. The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2008, 38:1521-1530.
17. Andrews G., Cuijpers P., Craske M.G., McEvoy P., Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13196.
18. Waller R., Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychol Med 2009, 39:705-712.
19. Gun S.Y., Titov N., Andrews G. Acceptability of Internet treatment of anxiety and depression. Australasian Psychiatry 2011, 19:259-264.
20. Mitchell N., Gordon P. Attitudes towards computerized CBT for depression amongst a student population. Behavior Cogn Psychother 2007, 35:421-430.
21. Mohr D.C., Siddique J., Ho J., Duffecy J., Jin L., Fokuo J.K. Interest in behavioral and psychological treatments delivered face-to-face, by telephone, and by Internet. Ann Behav Med 2010, 40:89-98.
22. Baumeister H, Seifferth H, Lin J, Nowoczin L, Lüking M, Ebert D. Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on chronic pain patients' acceptance of internet-based pain interventions - a randomised controlled trial, Clin J Pain, in press.
23. Celik V., Yesilyurt E. Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Comput Educ 2013, 60:148-158.
24. Jimison H., Gorman P., Woods S., Nygren P., Walker M., Norris S., et al. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2008, 1-1422.
25. Nijland N., van Gemert-Pijnen Julia E.W.C., Kelders S.M., Brandenburg B.J., Seydel E.R. Factors influencing the use of a Web-based application for supporting the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2011, 13:e71.
26. Thoolen B., Ridder D.de, Bensing J., Gorter K., Rutten G. Who participates in diabetes self-management interventions? Issues of recruitment and retainment. Diabetes Educ 2007, 33:465-474.
27. Brouwer W., Oenema A., Crutzen R., Nooijer Jd Vries Nd, Brug J. What makes people decide to visit and use an internet-delivered behavior-change intervention?: A qualitative study among adults. Health Educ 2009, 109:460-473.
28. Brouwer W., Oenema A., Crutzen R., Nooijer J.de, de Vries, Nanne K., et al. An exploration of factors related to dissemination of and exposure to internet-delivered behavior change interventions aimed at adults: a Delphi study approach. J Med Internet Res 2008, 10:e10.
29. Cranen K., Drossaert C.H., Brinkman E.S., Braakman-Jansen A.L., Ijzerman M.J., Vollenbroek-Hutten M.M. An exploration of chronic pain patients' perceptions of home telerehabilitation services. Health Expect 2012, 15:339-350.
30. Nowoczin L. Akzeptanz von internetbasierten Interventionen zur Verbesserung depressiver Belastungen bei Diabetespatienten - eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie. Freiburg 2013.
31. Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003, 27:425-478.
32. Holden R.J., Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010, 43:159-172.
33. Kim J., Park H. Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers' health behavior intention. J Med Internet Res 2012, 14:e133.
34. Wilson E.V., Lankton N.K. Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11:241-248.
35. Or C.K., Karsh B., Severtson D.J., Burke L.J., Brown R.L., Brennan P.F. Factors affecting home care patients' acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011, 18:51-59.
36. Haase R., Schultheiss T., Kempcke R., Thomas K., Ziemssen T. Use and acceptance of electronic communication by patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicenter questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res 2012, 14:e135.
37. Polonsky W.H., Anderson B.J., Lohrer P.A., Welch G., Jacobson A.M., Aponte J.E., et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 1995, 18:754-760.
38. Hermanns N., Kulzer B., Krichbaum M., Kubiak T., Haak T. How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Diabetologia 2006, 49:469-477.
39. Kroenke K., Strine T.W., Spitzer R.L., Williams, Janet B.W., Berry J.T., et al. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Dis 2009, 114:163-173.
40. Blankers M., Koeter Maarten W.J., Schippers G.M. Missing data approaches in eHealth research: simulation study and a tutorial for nonmathematically inclined researchers. J Med Internet Res 2010, 12:e54.
41. Wootton B.M., Titov N., Dear B.F., Spence J., Kemp A., Verdejo García A. The acceptability of internet-based treatment and characteristics of an adult sample with obsessive compulsive disorder: an internet survey. PLoS One 2011, 6:e20548.
42. Donkin L., Christensen H., Naismith S.L., Neal B., Hickie I.B., Glozier N. A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies. J Med Internet Res 2011, 13:e52.
43. Corrigan P.W., Rüsch N. Mental illness stereotypes and clinical care: do people avoid treatment because of stigma?. Psychiatr Rehabil Skills 2002, 6:312-334.
44. Baumeister H., Härter M. Prevalence of mental disorders based on general population surveys. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007, 42:537-546.
45. Smith K.L.W., Matheson F.I., Moineddin R., Dunn J.R., Lu H., Cairney J., et al. Gender differences in mental health service utilization among respondents reporting depression in a national health survey. Health (N Y) 2013, 5:1561-1571.
46. Taiwo A., Downe A. The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a meta-analytic review of empirical findings. J Theoretic Applied Inform Technol 2013, 49:48-58.
47. Bhattacherjee A., Sanford C. The intention-behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength. Behav Inform Technol 2009, 28:389-401.
48. Baumeister H., Krämer L., Brockhaus B. Grundlagen psychologischer Interventionen zur Änderung des Gesundheitsverhaltens. Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabil 2008, 82:254-264.
49. Dattakumar A., Gray K., Henderson K., Maeder A., Chenery H. We are not educating the future clinical health professional workforce adequately for e-health competence: findings of an Australian study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012, 178:33-38.
50. Moxham C., Chambers N., Girling J., Garg S., Jelfs E., Bremner J. Perspectives on the enablers of e-heath adoption: an international interview study of leading practitioners. Health Serv Manage Res 2012, 25:129-137.
51. van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C., Nijland N., van Limburg M., Ossebaard H.C., Kelders S.M., et al. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res 2011, 13:e111.
52. Bennett G.G., Glasgow R.E. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health 2009, 30:273-292.