A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of ehealth technologies

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Van Gemert Pijnen, Julia Ewc ^a   Nijland, Nicol ^a   Van Limburg, Maarten ^a   Ossebaard, Hans C ^b   Kelders, Saskia M ^a   Eysenbach, Gunther ^c   Seydel, Erwin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Design; E collaboration; EHealth; Evaluation; Health 2.0; Implementation; Multidisciplinary approach; Participation; Wiki

Indexed keywords

FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PHILOSOPHY; REVIEW; SOCIAL MEDIA; TELEMEDICINE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; HOLISTIC HEALTH; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; TELEMEDICINE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84859896744     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1672     Document Type: Review

References (118)

1. Atienza AA, Hesse BW, Gustafson DH, Croyle RT. E-health research and patient-centered care examining theory, methods, and application. Am J Prev Med 2010 Jan;38(1):85-88. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.027] [Medline: 20117562]
2. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011;8(1):e1000387 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387] [Medline: 21267058]
3. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006 May 16;144(10):742-752 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 16702590]
4. World Health Organization. Medical Devices: Managing the Mismatch: An Outcome of the Priority Medical Devices Project. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
5. Chaudhry SI, Phillips CO, Stewart SS, Riegel B, Mattera JA, Jerant AF, et al. Telemonitoring for patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. J Card Fail 2007 Feb;13(1):56-62. [doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.09.001] [Medline: 17339004]
6. Dansky KH, Thompson D, Sanner T. A framework for evaluating eHealth research. Eval Program Plann 2006 Nov;29(4):397-404. [doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.08.009] [Medline: 17950868]
7. Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Werkman A, Seydel ER. Evaluation of a web-based lifestyle coach designed to maintain a healthy bodyweight. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16(1):3-7. [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.001003] [Medline: 20086259]
8. Nijland N, Cranen K, Boer H, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Seydel ER. Patient use and compliance with medical advice delivered by a web-based triage system in primary care. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16(1):8-11. [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.001004] [Medline: 20086260]
9. Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen J, Boer H, Steehouder MF, Seydel ER. Evaluation of internet-based technology for supporting self-care: problems encountered by patients and caregivers when using self-care applications. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(2):e13 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.957] [Medline: 18487137]
10. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11] [Medline: 15829473]
11. Christensen H, Mackinnon A. The law of attrition revisited. J Med Internet Res 2006;8(3):e20 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e20] [Medline: 17032636]
12. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e13 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194] [Medline: 19403466]
13. Fry JP, Neff RA. Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e16 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1138] [Medline: 19632970]
14. Kelders SM, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Werkman A, Nijland N, Seydel ER. Effectiveness of a Web-based intervention aimed at healthy dietary and physical activity behavior: a randomized controlled trial about users and usage. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(2):e32 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1624] [Medline: 21493191]
15. Neve MJ, Collins CE, Morgan PJ. Dropout, nonusage attrition, and pretreatment predictors of nonusage attrition in a commercial Web-based weight loss program. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(4):e69 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1640] [Medline: 21156470]
16. Van 't Riet J, Crutzen R, De Vries H. Investigating predictors of visiting, using, and revisiting an online health-communication program: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(3):e37 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1345] [Medline: 20813716]
17. Wangberg SC, Bergmo TS, Johnsen JA. Adherence in Internet-based interventions. Patient Prefer Adherence 2008;2:57-65 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19920945]
18. Wanner M, Martin-Diener E, Bauer G, Braun-Fahrländer C, Martin BW. Comparison of trial participants and open access users of a web-based physical activity intervention regarding adherence, attrition, and repeated participation. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(1):e3 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1361] [Medline: 20147006]
19. Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Werkman A, Seydel ER. Usage and effect of a web-based intervention for the prevention of overweight; a RCT. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160(Pt 1):28-32. [Medline: 20841644]
20. Nijland N. Grounding eHealth: Towards a Holistic Framework for Sustainable eHealth Technologies [thesis]. Enschede: University of Twente; 2011.
21. Verhoeven F. When Staff Handle Staph: User-Driven Versus Expert-Driven Communication of Infection Control Guidelines [thesis]. Enschede: University of Twente; 2009.
22. Verhoeven F, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Eysenbach G, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010 May;4(3):666-684 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 20513335]
23. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000126 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126] [Medline: 19688038]
24. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e22 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030] [Medline: 18725354]
25. Van De Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Schoonhoven L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e18 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1350] [Medline: 20542857]
26. Kukafka R, Johnson SB, Linfante A, Allegrante JP. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J Biomed Inform 2003 Jun;36(3):218-227. [Medline: 14615230]
27. Shaw NT. 'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework. Comput Biol Med 2002 May;32(3):209-220. [Medline: 11922936]
28. Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int J Med Inform 2008 Jun;77(6):386-398. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011] [Medline: 17964851]
29. Kaufman D, Roberts WD, Merrill J, Lai TY, Bakken S. Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nurs Res 2006;55(2 Suppl):S37-S42. [Medline: 16601633]
30. Van Der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(3):235-243 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1094] [Medline: 12626373]
31. DeLone W, McLean E. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 1992;3(1):60-95. [doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60]
32. DeLone W, McLean E. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Inform Syst 2003;19(4):9-30.
33. Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001;84(Pt 2):1145-1149. [Medline: 11604908]
34. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-Suppl:206. [Medline: 5338568]
35. National Cancer Institute. Making Health Communication Programs Work. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1989.
36. Boehm BW. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 1988;21(5):61-72. [doi: 10.1109/2.59]
37. Hartson HR, Hix D. Toward empirically derived methodologies and tools for human-computer interface development. Int J Man Mach Stud 1989;31(4):477-494. [doi: 10.1016/0020-7373(89)90005-9]
38. Royce WW. Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. In: 9th International Conference on Software Engineering (International Conference on Software Engineering//Proceedings).: Association for Computing Machinery; 1987 Presented at: 9th International Conference on Software Engineering; Apr 2, 1987; Los Alamitos, CA, USA.
39. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13(3):319-340. [doi: 10.2307/249008]
40. Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 1993;38(3):475-487. [doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1022]
41. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003;27(3):425-478.
42. Miller EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: a theoretical framework for evaluation. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8(6):311-318. [doi: 10.1258/135763302320939185] [Medline: 12537917]
43. Field ME. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
44. Reid JA. Telemedicine Primer: Understanding the Issues. Billings, MT: Innovative Medical Communications; 1996.
45. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001;3(2):E20 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20] [Medline: 11720962]
46. Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A. What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(1):e1 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1] [Medline: 15829471]
47. Robinson TN, Patrick K, Eng TR, Gustafson D. An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health. JAMA 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1264-1269. [Medline: 9786378]
48. Pagliari C. Design and evaluation in eHealth: challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(2):e15 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15] [Medline: 17537718]
49. Kazanjian A, Green CJ. Beyond effectiveness: the evaluation of information systems using A Comprehensive Health Technology Assessment Framework. Comput Biol Med 2002 May;32(3):165-177. [Medline: 11922933]
50. Hamid A, Sarmad A. Evaluation of e-health services: user's perspective criteria. Transform Gov 2008;2(4):243-255. [doi: 10.1108/17506160810917945]
51. Eng TR, Gustafson DH, Henderson J, Jimison H, Patrick K. Introduction to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health. Am J Prev Med 1999 Jan;16(1):10-15. [Medline: 9894549]
52. Jai Ganesh A. E-health: drivers, applications, challenges ahead and strategies: a conceptual framework. Ind J Med Inform 2004;1:39-47.
53. Honderich T. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy: New Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
54. Lawrence C, Weisz G. Greater Than the Parts: Holism in Biomedicine, 1920-1950. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
55. James S. The Content of Social Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
56. Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Boer H, Steehouder MF, Seydel ER. Increasing the use of e-consultation in primary care: results of an online survey among non-users of e-consultation. Int J Med Inform 2009 Oct;78(10):688-703. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.002] [Medline: 19625210]
57. Carr D, Howells A, Chang M, Hirji N, English A. An integrated approach to stakeholder engagement. Healthc Q 2009;12 Spec No Ontario:62-70 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19458512]
58. Freeman R. The stakeholder approach revisited. Z Wirtsch Unternehmensethik 2004;5(3):228-241.
59. Hesse BW, Shneiderman B. eHealth research from the user's perspective. Am J Prev Med 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S97-103. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.019] [Medline: 17466825]
60. Kushniruk A. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Comput Biol Med 2002 May;32(3):141-149. [Medline: 11922931]
61. Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1983.
62. Lilford RJ, Foster J, Pringle M. Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust. PLoS Med 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000186 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186] [Medline: 19956674]
63. Broens TH, Huis in't Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13(6):303-309. [doi: 10.1258/135763307781644951] [Medline: 17785027]
64. Grigsby J, Brega AG, Devore PA. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research. Telemed J E Health 2005 Jun;11(3):317-328. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2005.11.317] [Medline: 16035929]
65. May C, Finch T, Mair F, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Eccles M, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:148 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148] [Medline: 17880693]
66. Øvretveit J, Scott T, Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Brommels M. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. Int J Qual Health Care 2007 Oct;19(5):259-266 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm031] [Medline: 17717038]
67. Shreeve S. Crossover Health. 2007. Health 2. 0: The DefinitionURL: http://blog.crossoverhealth.com/2007/01/24/ health-20-the-definition/ [accessed 2010-09-14] [WebCite Cache ID 5jmdm42UE]
68. Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J, Tröster G. Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods Inf Med 2010;49(1):67-73. [doi: 10.3414/ME09-02-0044] [Medline: 20011810]
69. Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S, Courtney KL, Sondhi M, Vimarlund V, et al. Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15(1):8-13 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2492] [Medline: 17947617]
70. Flynn D, Gregory P, Makki H, Gabbay M. Expectations and experiences of eHealth in primary care: a qualitative practice-based investigation. Int J Med Inform 2009 Sep;78(9):588-604. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.008] [Medline: 19482542]
71. Chatterjee S, Price A. Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16(2):171-178 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2859] [Medline: 19074300]
72. Fogg B. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2002.
73. Fogg B. A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Persuasive '09. 2009 Presented at: 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; April 26-29, 2009; Claremont, CA, USA. [doi: 10.1145/1541948.1541999]
74. Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 2009;24(1):28.
75. Ploug T, Hasle P, Oinas-Kukkonen H. Persuasive technology. In: Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 7-10, 2010, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer... Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI).: Springer; 2010 Presented at: 5th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; June 7-10, 2010; Copenhagen, Denmark.
76. Ahern DK. Challenges and opportunities of eHealth research. Am J Prev Med 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S75-S82. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.016] [Medline: 17466822]
77. Ammenwerth E, Gräber S, Herrmann G, Bürkle T, König J. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2003 Sep;71(2-3):125-135. [Medline: 14519405]
78. Atienza AA, Hesse BW, Baker TB, Abrams DB, Rimer BK, Croyle RT, et al. Critical issues in eHealth research. Am J Prev Med 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S71-S74. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.013] [Medline: 17466821]
79. Bates DW, Wright A. Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research. PLoS Med 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000105 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000105] [Medline: 19753106]
80. Currie LM. Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics. Int J Med Inform 2005 Dec;74(11-12):908-916. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.007] [Medline: 16099711]
81. Eng TR. eHealth research and evaluation: challenges and opportunities. J Health Commun 2002;7(4):267-272. [doi: 10.1080/10810730290001747] [Medline: 12356287]
82. Gagnon MP, Scott RE. Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: lessons from health technology assessment. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 2:S34-S36. [doi: 10.1258/135763305775124722] [Medline: 16375790]
83. Glasgow RE. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S119-S126. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.023] [Medline: 17466816]
84. Gustafson DH, Wyatt JC. Evaluation of ehealth systems and services. BMJ 2004 May 15;328(7449):1150 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1150] [Medline: 15142895]
85. Rigby M. Essential prerequisites to the safe and effective widespread roll-out of e-working in healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2006 Feb;75(2):138-147. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.006] [Medline: 16085451]
86. Taylor P. Evaluating telemedicine systems and services. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11(4):167-177. [doi: 10.1258/1357633054068955] [Medline: 15969791]
87. Yusof MM, Papazafeiropoulou A, Paul RJ, Stergioulas LK. Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems. Int J Med Inform 2008 Jun;77(6):377-385. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.004] [Medline: 17904898]
88. Cockerill R, Barnsley J. Innovation theory and its applicability to our understanding of the diffusion of new management practices in health care organizations. Healthc Manage Forum 1997;10(1):35-38. [Medline: 10167073]
89. Kern J. Evaluation of teleconsultation systems. Int J Med Inform 2006;75(3-4):330-334. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.08.001] [Medline: 16143564]
90. Wootton R, Hebert MA. What constitutes success in telehealth? J Telemed Telecare 2001;7 Suppl 2:3-7. [Medline: 11747643]
91. May C, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Wallace P, Telemedicine Adoption Study Group. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(6):596-604 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1145] [Medline: 12925553]
92. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001 Nov;64(1):39-56. [Medline: 11673101]
93. Resnicow K, Strecher V, Couper M, Chua H, Little R, Nair V, et al. Methodologic and design issues in patient-centered e-health research. Am J Prev Med 2010 Jan;38(1):98-102. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.034] [Medline: 20117564]
94. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inform 2001 Nov;64(1):15-37. [Medline: 11673100]
95. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Guttman M, Hanson W. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003:209-240.
96. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2010 Mar 30. [doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4] [Medline: 20703721]
97. Gagnon MP, Légaré F, Labrecque M, Frémont P, Pluye P, Gagnon J, et al. Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(1):CD006093. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006093.pub2] [Medline: 19160265]
98. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(4):CD004274. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4] [Medline: 16235356]
99. Verhoeven F, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Seydel E, Steehouder M. The contribution of teleconsultation and videoconferencing to diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(5):e37 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.5.e37] [Medline: 18093904]
100. Demiris G, Charness N, Krupinski E, Ben-Arieh D, Washington K, Wu J, et al. The role of human factors in telehealth. Telemed J E Health 2010 May;16(4):446-453. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0114] [Medline: 20420540]
101. Maguire M. Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2001;55(4):587-634. [doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503]
102. Zhang J. Human-centered computing in health information systems. Part 1: analysis and design. J Biomed Inform 2005 Feb;38(1):1-3. [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.12.002] [Medline: 15694880]
103. Zhang J. Human-centered computing in health information systems part 2: evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2005 Jun;38(3):173-175. [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.12.005] [Medline: 15896690]
104. Esser PE, Goossens RH. A framework for the design of user-centred teleconsulting systems. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15(1):32-39. [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080601] [Medline: 19139218]
105. Curry SJ. eHealth research and healthcare delivery beyond intervention effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S127-S130. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.026] [Medline: 17466817]
106. Chesbrough H. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2006.
107. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
108. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci C. Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 2005;16(1):1-25.
109. Parente ST. Beyond the hype: a taxonomy of e-health business models. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(6):89-102 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11192424]
110. Sharp H, Finkelstein A, Galal G. Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In: DEXA '99. 1999 Presented at: 10th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications; Sept 1-3, 1999; Florence, Italy. [doi: 10.1109/DEXA.1999.795198]
111. Lerouge C, Ma J, Sneha S, Tolle K. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. Int J Med Inform 2011 Apr 8. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006] [Medline: 21481635]
112. Saaty TL. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors - the analytic hierarchy/network process. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas 2008;102(2):251-318. [doi: 10.1007/BF03191825]
113. Spencer D. Card Sorting: Designing Usable Categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media; 2009.
114. Wood JR, Wood LE. Card sorting: current practices and beyond. J Usability Stud 2008;4(1):1-6.
115. Cain M, Mittman R. Diffusion of Innovation in Health Care. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation; 2002.
116. Tidd J. Gaining Momentum: Managing the Diffusion of Innovations. London: Imperial College Press; 2010.
117. Eysenbach G. A framework for evaluating e-health: systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet [abstract]. J Med Internet Res 2000;2(suppl 2). [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2.suppl2.e13]
118. Van Limburg M, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, Ossebaard HC, Hendrix RMG, Seydel ER. Why business modelling is crucial in the development of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res (forthcoming) 2011;13(4). [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1674]