Factors affecting home care patients' acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-59

  Or, Calvin K L ^a   Karsh, Ben Tzion ^b   Severtson, Dolores J ^c   Burke, Laura J ^d   Brown, Roger L ^c   Brennan, Patricia Flatley ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d AURORA HEALTH CARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; HEALTH CARE; HEART DISEASE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSING PRACTICE; PATIENT CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HEART DISEASES; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; SELF CARE; TELENURSING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 78650500253     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.007336     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health. Wired for health and well-being: the emergence of interactive health communication. In: Eng TR, Gustafson DH, eds. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1999.
2. Gustafson DH, Bosworth K, Hawkins RP, et al. CHESS: a computer-based system for providing information, referrals, decision support and social support to people facing medical and other health-related crises. Paper presented at: Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1992. Baltimore, MD: American medical Informatics Association.
3. Brennan PF, Ripich S, Moore SM. The use of home-based computers to support persons living with AIDS/ARC. J Community Health Nurs 1991;8:3-14.
4. Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:356-71.
5. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Boberg E, et al. Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1999;16:1-9.
6. Martinez A, Everss E, Rojo-Alvarez JL, et al. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:234-41.
7. Scott RL, Park MH, Uber PA, et al. Electronic home monitoring reduces medical resource utilization in chronic heart failure: A prospective investigation of the HomMed-Sentry telemonitoring system. J Card Fail 2004;10:S110-11.
8. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:1-30.
9. Louis AA, Turner T, Gretton M, et al. A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2003;5:583-90.
10. Kashem A, Droogan MT, Santamore WP, et al. Web-based Internet telemedicine management of patients with heart failure. Telemed J E Health 2006;12:439-47.
11. Stoop AP, Van't Riet A, Berg M. Using information technology for patient education: realizing surplus value? Patient Educ Couns 2004;54:187-95.
12. Williams P, Nicholas D, Huntington P. Non use of health information kiosks examined in an information needs context. Health Info Libr J 2003;20:95-103.
13. Rogers A, Mead N. More than technology and access: primary care patients' views on the use and non-use of health information in the Internet age. Health Soc Care Community 2004;12:102-10.
14. Liddy C, Dusseault JJ, Dahrouge S, et al. Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:58-65.
15. Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C, et al. Usability in the real world: Assessing medical information technologies in patients' homes. J Biomed Inform 2003;36:45-60.
16. Patterson TL, Shaw WS, Masys DR. Improving health through computer self-help programs: theory and practice. In: Brennan PF, Schneider SJ, Tornquist E, eds. Information Networks for Community Health. New York: Springer, 1997:219-46.
17. Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, et al. Barriers and Drivers of Health Information Technology Use for the Elderly, Chronically III, and Underserved. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 175 (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0024), AHRQ Publication No. 09-E004.
18. Or CKL, Karsh B. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:550-60.
19. Boberg EW, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Development, acceptance, and use patterns of a computer-based education and social support system for people living with AIDS HIV infection. Comput Human Behav 1995;11:289-311.
20. Klein R. Internet-based patient-physician electronic communication applications: patient acceptance and trust. e-Service Journal 2007;5:27-51.
21. Lai TY, Larson EL, Rockoff ML, et al. User acceptance of HIV TIDESeTailored interventions for management of depressive symptoms in persons living with HIV/ AIDS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:217-26.
22. Lu HP, Gustafson DH. An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time. Int J Inf Manage 1994;14:317-29.
23. Wilson EV, Lankton NK. Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11: 241-8.
24. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003;27:425-78.
25. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319.
26. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989;35:982-1003.
27. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in healthcare. J Biomed Inform 2010;43:159-72.
28. Venkatesh V, Speier C, Morris MG. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences 2002;33:297-316.
29. Brennan PF, Casper GR, Kossman S, et al. HeartCareII: Home care support for patients with chronic cardiac disease. Medinfo 2007;129:988-92.
30. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995;6:144-76.
31. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL, et al. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999;16:91-112.
32. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 2003;40: 191-204.
33. Wu JH, Shen WS, Lin LM, et al. Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. Int J Qual Health Care 2008;20:123-9.
34. Sheppard BH, Hartwick J, Warshaw PR. The Theory of Reasoned Action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J Consum Res 1988;15:325-43.
35. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
36. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
37. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, et al. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:180-5.
38. Mead N, Varnam R, Rogers A, et al. What predicts patients' interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England? J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8:33-9.
39. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179-211.
40. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46:186-204.
41. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 1991;2:192-222.
42. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 1991;2:173-91.
43. Hermanova H. New challenges in ageing: home care. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19:142-6.
44. Finkelstein J, Khare R, Ansell J. Feasibility and patients' acceptance of home automated telemanagement of oral anticoagulation therapy. Paper presented at: Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association, 2003. Washington, DC: American medical Informatics Association.
45. Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, et al. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. Paper presented at: Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association, 2006. Washington, DC: American medical Informatics Association.
46. Tak SH, Hong SH. Use of the Internet for health information by older adults with arthritis. Orthop Nurs 2005;24:134-8.
47. Ferguson T. Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a new partnership for high quality health care. Br Med J 2000;321:1129-32.
48. Fowles JB, Kind AC, Craft C, et al. Patients' interest in reading their medical record: relation with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and patients' approach to health care. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:793-800.
49. Or CKL, Severtson DJ, Karsh B, et al. Development of an instrument to measure technology acceptance among homecare patients with heart disease. Paper presented at: Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association, 2006. Washington, DC: American medical Informatics Association.
50. Haley SM, Jette AM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. J Gerontology A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57:M217-22.
51. Sayers SP, Jette AM, Haley SM, et al. Validation of the late-life function and disability instrument. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1554-9.
52. Haley SM, Ludlow LH, Kooyoomjian JT. Extending the range of functional assessment in older adults: development of the late-life function and disability instrument. J Aging Phys Act 2002;10:453-65.
53. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire (VFQ-25). Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1050-8.
54. Mangione CM. The National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)eScoring algorithm. 2000:1-15. http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/vfq/vfq25_manual.pdf (accessed 22 November 2010).
55. Coffman DL, MacCallum RC. Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2005;40:235-59.
56. Cattell RB, Burdsal CA. The radial parcel double factoring design: a solution to the item-vs-parcel controversy. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1975;10:165-79.
57. Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, et al. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling 2002;9: 151-73.
58. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. 5th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 1998-2007.
59. Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
60. Chou CP, Bentler PM. Model modification in structural equation modeling by imposing constraints. Comput Stat Data Anal 2002;41:271-87.
61. MacCallum RC. Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychol Bull 1986;100:107-20.
62. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd edn. New York: The Guilford Press, 2005.
63. Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1990;25:173-80.
64. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;107:238-46.
65. Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1973;38:1-10.
66. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999;6:1-55.
67. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1996;1:130-49.
68. Hartwick J, Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 1994;40:440-65.
69. Horst M, Kuttschreuter M, Gutteling JM. Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior 2007;23:1838-52.
70. Dugaw JE, Civello K, Chuinard C, et al. Will patients use a computer to give a medical history? J Fam Pract 2000;49:921-3.
71. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res 1987;16:78-117.
72. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992;22:1111-32.
73. Igbaria M, Guimaraes T, Davis GB. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 1995;11:87-114.
74. Friedman RH, Kazis LE, Jette A, et al. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. Am J Hypertens 1996;9:285-92.
75. Leirer VO, Morrow DG, Tanke ED, et al. Elders' nonadherence: its assessment and medication reminding by voice mail. Gerontologist 1991;31:514-20.
76. Schraagen JM, Chipman SF, Shalin VL. Cognitive Task Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Arlbaum, 2000.
77. Vicente K. Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
78. Weir CR, Nebeker JJR, Hicken BL, et al. A cognitive task analysis of information management strategies in a computerized provider order entry environment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14:65-75.
79. Karsh B, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, et al. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:I59-65.
80. Hollnagel E, Woods DD. Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: CRC Press, 2005.
81. Littner M, Hirshkowitz M, Davila D, et al. Practice parameters for the use of auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure devices for titrating pressures and treating adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 2002;25:143-7.
82. Woods DD. Designs are hypotheses about how artifacts shape cognition and collaboration. Ergonomics 1998;41:168-73.
83. Hollnagel E. Cognitive ergonomics: it's all in the mind. Ergonomics 1997;40:1170-82.
84. Woods DD, Roth EM. Cognitive engineering-dhuman problem-solving with tools. Hum Factors 1988;30:415-30.
85. Holden RJ, Or CKL, Alper SJ, et al. A change management framework for macroergonomic field research. Appl Ergon 2008;39:459-74.
86. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Preparing the Staff for New Technologies. Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics: Managing Technological Change. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
87. Demiris G, Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM. Considerations for the design of a web-based clinical monitoring and educational system for elderly patients. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001;8:468-72.
88. Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh B, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15(Suppl I):i50-8.
89. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press, 1993.
90. Rubin JR. Handbook of Usability Testing. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
91. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Tannenbaum SI, et al. Toward theoretically based principles of training effectiveness: a model and initial empirical investigation. Mil Psychol 1995;7:141-64.
92. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:471-99.
93. Or CK, Valdez RS, Casper GR, et al. Human factors and ergonomics in home care: current concerns and future considerations for health information technology. Work 2009;33:201-9.
94. Kelley CL, Charness N. Issues in training older adults to use computers. Behav Inf Technol 1995;14:107-20.
95. Fisk AD, Rogers WA. Health care of older adults: the promise of human factors research. In: Rogers WA, Fisk AD, eds. Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001:1-12.
96. Karsh B. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:388-94.
97. Holden RJ, Karsh B. A theoretical model of health information technology behavior. Behav Inf Technol 2009;28:21-38.
98. Rogers WA, Fisk AD. Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.
99. Vanderheiden GC. Design for people with functional limitations. In: Salvendy G, ed. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2006: 1387-417.
100. Nichols TA, Rogers WA, Fisk AD. Design for aging. In: Salvendy G, ed. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2006: 1418-45.
101. Czaja SJ, Lee CC. Information technology and older adults. In: Jacko JA, Sears A, eds. Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. 2nd edn. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007:777-93.
102. Eysenbach G. Design and evaluation of consumer health information web sites. In: Lewis D, Eysenbach G, Kukafka R, et al, eds. Consumer Health Informatics: Informing Consumers and Improving Health Care. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2005:34-60.