Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered E-health

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 241-248

  Vance Wilson, E ^a   Lankton, Nancy K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 3042842140     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1475     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Maheu M.M., Whitten P., Allen A. E-health, Telehealth, and Telemedicine. 2001;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
2. Kaplan B., Brennan P.F. Consumer informatics supporting patients as co-producers of quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 8:2001;309-316
3. Pinciroli F. A manifesto on telehealth and telemedicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 8:2001;349-350
4. Wilson E.V. Asynchronous health care communication. Commun ACM. 46:2003;79-84
5. Lazarus I.R. Separating myth from reality in e-health initiatives. Managed Healthc Exec. Jun:2001;33-36
6. Malcolm C.L. Five e-business strategies you can take to the bank. Healthc Financ Manage. Sep:2001;72-75
7. Masys D., Baker D., Butros A., Cowles K.E. Giving patients access to their medical records via the Internet: the PCASSO experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2:2002;181-191
8. Wilson E.V., Lankton N.K. Strategic implications of asynchronous healthcare communication. Int J Healthc Technol Manage. 5:2003;213-231
9. Bodenheimer T., Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA. 290:2003;259-264
10. Plunkett. Health Care Industry Trends and Market Analysis. Plunkett Research, Ltd. Available at: http://www.plunkettresearch.com/health/ health_trends.htm. Accessed Feb 7, 2004.
11. Homan Q. Healthcare satisfaction study final report. Harris Interactive/ARiA Marketing Report. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive. com/news/downloads/harrisariahcsatrpt.pdf. Accessed Feb 7, 2004.
12. Brooks F.P. The Mythical Man-Month. 1995;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
13. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Machine Stud. 38:1993;475-478
14. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13:1989;319-329
15. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 35:1989;982-1002
16. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol. 22:1992;1111-1132
17. Fishbein M., Belief Ajzen I. Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. 1975;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
18. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. 1980;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
19. Sheppard B.H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P.R. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J Consumer Res. 15:1988;325-343
20. Hu P.J., Chau P.Y.K., Sheng O.R.L., Tam K.Y. Examining technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manage Inf Syst. 16:1999;91-112
21. Venkatesh V., Speier C., Morris M.G. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis Sci. 22:2002;297-316
22. Gefen D., Straub D.W. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q. 21:1997;389-400
23. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci. 27:1996;451-481
24. Jackson C.M., Chow S., Leitch R.A. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decis Sci. 28:1997;357-389
25. Hong W., Thong J.Y.L., Wong W., Tam K. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. J Manage Inf Syst. 19:2001;97-124
26. Sherbourne C.D., Hays R.D., Ordway L., DiMatteo M.R., Kravitz R.L. Antecedents of adherence to medical recommendations: results from the medical outcomes study. J Behav Med. 15:1992;447-468
27. Rubin H.R., Gandek B., Rogers W.H., Kosinski M., McHorney C.A., Ware J.E. Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. JAMA. 270:1993;835-840
28. Kerr E.A., Hays R.D., Lee M.L., Siu A.L. Does dissatisfaction with access to specialists affect the desire to leave a managed care plan? Med Care Res Rev. 55:1998;59-77
29. John J. Patient satisfaction: the impact of past experience. J Health Care Marketing. 12:1992;56-64
30. Ferguson T. Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a new partnership for high quality health care. BMJ. 321:2000;1129-1132
31. Fulton M.L. A healthy flow of information. Searcher. 10:2002;10-12
32. Ende J., Lewis K., Ash A., Moskowitz M.A. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 4:1989;23-30
33. Nease R.F., Brooks W.B. Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey. J Gen Intern Med. 10:1995;593-600
34. Deber R.B., Kraetschmer N., Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 156:1996;1414-1420
35. Strull W.M., Lo B., Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 252:1984;2990-2994
36. Horrigan JB, Rainie L. Counting on the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/ PIP_Expectations.pdf. Accessed Feb 7, 2004.
37. Prady S.L., Norris D., Lester J.E., Hoch D.B. Expanding the guidelines for electronic communication with patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 8:2001;344-348
38. Fallis D., Frické M. Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet: a study of indicators relating to information for managing fever in children in the home. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 9:2002;73-79
39. Demiris G., Finkelstein S.M., Speedie S.M. Considerations for the design of a Web-based clinical monitoring and educational system for elderly patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 8:2001;468-472
40. Marshall G.N., Hays R.D., Sherbourne C.D., Wells K.B. The structure of patient satisfaction with outpatient medical care. Psychol Assess. 5:1993;477-483
41. Maruyama G.M. Basics of Structural Equation Modeling. 1998;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
42. Arbuckle J., Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 User's Guide. 1999;Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago, IL
43. Carmines E.G., McIver J.P. Analyzing models with unobserved variables. Bohrnstedt G.W., Borgatta E.F. Social Measurement: Current Issues. 1981;65-115 Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
44. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Bollen K.A., Long J.S. Testing Structural Equation Models. 1993;136-162 Sage, Newbury Park, CA
45. Payton F.C., Brennan P.F. How a community health information network is really used. Commun ACM. 42:1999;85-89