Perspectives on the enablers of e-heath adoption: An international interview study of leading practitioners

Health Services Management Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 129-137

  Moxham, Claire ^a   Chambers, Naomi ^b   Girling, Jeff ^b   Garg, Shruti ^b   Jelfs, Elizabeth ^c   Bremner, Jeni ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Department of Policy   (United Kingdom)

^d European Health Management Association   (Belgium)

^e European Health Management Commission   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMPOWERMENT; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REIMBURSEMENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84869407443     PISSN: 09514848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/hsmr.2012.012018     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Tsiknaskis M, Kouroubali A. Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: A case study employing the FITT framework. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:39-52
2. Kreps GL, Neuhauser L. New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Counsel 2010;78:329-36
3. Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:22-31
4. Mukherjee A, McGinnis J. E-healthcare. An analysis of key themes in research. Int J Pharmaceut Healthcare Market 2007;1:349-63
5. Murray E, Burns J, May C, et al. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implementation Sci 2011; 6:1-11
6. Hardiker NR, Grant MJ. Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: a literature review. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:1-12
7. Skinner H, Biscope S, Poland B. Quality of internet access: Barrier behind internet use statistics. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:875-880
8. Khechine H, Pascot D, Premont P. Use of health-related information from the Internet by English-speaking patients. Health Inform J 2008;14:17-28
9. Hoybe M, Johansen C, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T. Online interaction: effects of storytelling on an internet breast cancer support group. J Soc Interv 2008;17:29-40
10. Rawabdeh A. An e-health trend plan for the Jordanian health care system: A review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2007;20:516-31
11. Dansky KH, Thompson D, Sanner T. A framework for evaluating eHealth research. Eval Program Plann 2006;29:397-404
12. Kaye R, Kokia E, Shalev V, Idar D, Chinitz D. Barriers and success factors in health information technology: a practitioner's perspective. J Manag Market Healthcare 2010;3:163-175
13. Global Observatory for eHealth. Telemedicine - Opportunities and Developments in Member States. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2011
14. Rudowski R. Telemedicine in the context of different medical specialities: The Polish perspective. Polish J Pathol 2003;54:219-221
15. Anscombe J, Bacardit A. Mobile Health: Who Pays? London: AT Kearney/GSMA, 2011
16. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001;3:1-2
17. Hyysalo S. Versions of care technology. Hum Technol 2007;3:228-247
18. Hasu M. Constructing clinical use: an activity-theoretical perspective on implementing new technology. Technol Anal Strategic Manag 2000;12:369-382
19. Hyysalo S, Lehenkari J. Contextualising power in collaborative design. In: Binder T, Gregory J, Wagner I, eds. ProcParticipatory Design Conference. Palo Alto, CA, 23rd-25th June, 2002:93-104
20. Schmidt S, Sheikzadeh B, Beil B, Patten M, Stettin J. Acceptance of telemonitoring to enhance medication compliance in patients with chronic heart failure. Telemed e-Health 2008;14:426-433
21. Hyysalo S. Technology nurtured - collectives in maintaining and implementing technology for elderly care. Sci Stud 2004;17:23-43
22. Hanseth O, Monteiro E, Hatling M. Developing information infrastructure: the tension between standardization and flexibility. Sci Technol Hum Values 1996;21:407-426
23. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J, Potts HWW. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. Br Med J 2010;340:1-11
24. Hanseth O. Integration-complexity-risk: the making of information systems out-of-control. In: Ciborra CU, Hanseth O, eds. Risk, Complexity and ICT. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2007
25. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 2009;43:535-554
26. Curry SJ. eHealth research and healthcare delivery: beyond intervention effectiveness. Am J Prev Mede 2007;32:S127-S130
27. eHealth Ontario. Ontario's eHealth Strategy 2009-2012, Ontario: eHealth Ontario, 2009
28. Mair F, May C, Murray E, et al. Understanding the Implementation and Integration of e-Health Services: National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, London: 2009
29. Elford DR. Telemedicine in northern Norway. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:1-22
30. Guler NF, Ubeyli ED. Theory and applications of telemedicine. J Med Syst 2002;26:199-220
31. Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, Bhattacharyya AK, Graham AR, Davis JR. Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. Hum Pathol 2001;32:1283-1299
32. Goroll AH, Simon SR, Tripathi M, Ascenzo C, Bates D. Community-wide implementation of health information technology: The Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative Experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:132-139
33. Jennett PA, Scott RE, Affleck Hall L, et al. Policy implications associated with the socioeconomic and health system impact of tele-health: a case study from Canada. Telemed J e-Health 2004;10:77-83
34. Cook DA, Dupras DM. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Internal Med 2004;19:698-707
35. Childs S, Blenkinsopp E, Hall A, Walton G. Effective e-learning for health professionals and students - barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature: findings from the HeXL project. Health Inform Libraries J 2005;22:20-32
36. Lehmann ED. Computerised decision-support tools in diabetes care: hurdles to implementation. Diabetes Technol Therap 2004;6:422-429
37. Yellowlees PM, Kennedy C. Telemedicine; here to stay. Med J Aust 1997;166:262-5
38. Maglogiannis I. Design and implementation of a calibrated store and forward imaging system for teledermatology. J Med Systems 2004;28:455-467
39. Mairinger T. Acceptance of telepathology in daily practice. Anal Cell Pathol 2000;21:135-140
40. Berry LL, Bendapudi N. Health care: a fertile field for service research. J Serv Res 2007;10:111-122
41. Blank R, Burau V. Comparative Health Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2004