Who participates in diabetes self-management interventions?: Issues of recruitment and retainment

Diabetes Educator

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 465-474

  Thoolen, Bart ^a   De Ridder, Denise ^a   Bensing, Jozien ^a,b   Gorter, Kees ^c   Rutten, Guy ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CARE; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SELECTION; SELF CARE; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 34249033387     PISSN: 01457217     EISSN: 15546063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145721707301491     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ross S., Grant A., Counsell C., Gillespie W., Russel I., Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clinical Epidemiol. 1999 ; 52: 1143-1156.
2. Larzeler RE, Kuhn BR, Johnson B. The intervention selection bias: an unrecognized confound in intervention research. Psychol Bull. 2004 ; 130: 289-303.
3. Moher D., Schulz KF, Altman DG The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001 ; 357: 1191-1194.
4. Britton A., McKee M., Black N., McPherson K., Sanderson C., Bain C. Threats of applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 ; 4: 112-121.
5. Rothwell PM External validity of randomised controlled trials: to whom do the results of this trial apply. Lancet. 2005 ; 365: 82-93.
6. Hunninghake DB, Darby CA, Probstfield JL Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. 1987 ; 8: 6s - 30s.
7. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE Participation in outpatient diabetes education program: how many patients take part and how representative are they? Diabetes Educ. 1991 ; 17: 376-380.
8. Froehlicher ES, Lorig K. Editorial: who cares about recruitment anyway ? Patient Educ Couns. 2002 ; 48: 97.
9. Ellis PM Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2000 ; 11: 939-945.
10. Torgerson DJ, Klaber-Moffet J., Russel IT Patient preferences in randomised trials: threat or opportunity, J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 ; 1: 194-197.
11. Featherstone K., Donovan JL Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients perspectives on participation in a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 1998 ; 317: 1177-1180.
12. Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Bagdade JD If you build it will they come? Reach and adoption associated with a comprehensive lifestyle management program for women with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 ; 48: 99-105.
13. Lauritzen T., Griffin S., Borch-Johnsen K., Wareham Njm, Wolffenbuttel BH, Rutten G. The ADDITION study: proposed trial of the cost-effectiveness of an intensive multifactorial intervention on morbidity and mortality among people with type 2 diabetes detected by screening. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 ; 24: S6 - S11.
14. Adriaanse MC, Snoek FJ, Dekker JM, van der Ploeg HM, Heine RJ Screening for type 2 diabetes: an exploration of subject's perceptions regarding diagnosis and procedure. Diabetes Med. 2002 ; 19: 1-6.
15. Thoolen BJ, de Ridder D., Bensing J., Gorter K., Rutten G. Beyond good intentions: the development and evaluation of a proactive self-management course for patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Res. Epub ahead of print February 7, 2007. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl160.
16. Das EHHJ. How Fear Appeals Work: Motivational Bias in the Processing of Fear-Arousing Health Communications. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University ; 2001.
17. Skinner TC, Howells L., Greene S., Edgar K., McEvilly A., Johansson A. Development, reliability and validity of the diabetes illness representations questionnaire. Diabetes Med. 2003 ; 20: 283-289.
18. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000 ; 23: 943-950.
19. Lorig K., Stewart A., Ritter P., Gonzales V., Laurent D., Lynch J. Outcome Measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage ; 1996.
20. Kuijer RG, de Ridder DTD. Discrepancy in illness-related goals and quality of life in chronically ill patients: the role of self-efficacy. Psychol Health. 2003 ; 18: 313-330.
21. Adriaanse MC, Snoek FJ The psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006 ; 22: 20-25.
22. Thoolen BJ, de Ridder D., Bensing J., Gorter K., Rutten G. Psychological outcomes of screen-detected patients with type 2 diabetes: the influence of time since diagnosis and treatment intensity. Diabetes Care. 2006 ; 29: 2257-2262.
23. Banks J., Marmot M., Oldfield Z., Smith JP Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA. 2006 ; 295: 2037-2045.
24. Uitewaal P., Bruijnzeels P., de Hoop T., Hoes A., Thomas S. Feasibility of diabetes peer education for Turkish type 2 diabetes patients in Dutch general practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 ; 53: 359-363.
25. Poos Mjjc, Eysink Ped, Gommer AM, van der Wilk EA, Harbers MM Diabetes mellitus. Omvang van het probleem. In: Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven, RIVM, 2004. Available at: http://www.nationaalkompas.nl.