Acceptability of internet treatment of anxiety and depression

Australasian Psychiatry

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 259-264

  Gun, Shih Ying ^b   Titov, Nickolai ^a   Andrews, Gavin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

anxiety; attitudes; depression; Internet; survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; INTERNET; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; ANXIETY; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79959447564     PISSN: 10398562     EISSN: 14401665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10398562.2011.562295     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Marks I, Cavanagh K. Computer-aided psychological treatments: evolving issues. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2009; 5: 121-141.
2. Cuijpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A et al. Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2009; 38: 66-82.
3. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2009; 8: 196-205.
4. Vernmark K, Lenndin J, Bjärehed J et al. Internet administered guided self-help versus individualized e-mail therapy: a randomized trial of two versions of CBT for major depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2010; 48: 368-376.
5. Titov N, Andrews G, Johnston L, Schwencke G, Choi I. Shyness programme: longer term benefits, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2009; 43: 36-44.
6. Robinson E, Titov N, Andrews G, McIntyre K, Schwencke G, Solley K. Internet treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial comparing clinician vs. technician assistance. PLoS ONE 2010; 5(6): e10942. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0010942.
7. Rush B, Scott RE. Approved Telehealth Outcome Indicator Guidelines: Quality, Access, Acceptability and Cost. Calgary: Health Telematics Unit, University of Calgary, 2004.
8. Whitfield G, Williams C. If the evidence is so good - why doesn't anyone use them? A national survey of the use of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 2004; 32: 57-65. (Pubitemid 38233164)
9. Wangberg SC, Gammon D, Spitznogle K. In the eyes of the beholder: exploring psychologists' attitudes towards and use of e-therapy in Norway. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10: 418-422.
10. Wells M, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Becker-Blease KA. Online mental health treatment: concerns and considerations. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10: 453-459. (Pubitemid 47001187)
11. Kaltenthaler E, Sutcliffe P, Parry G, Beverley C, Rees A, Ferriter M. The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 2008; 38: 1521-1530.
12. Waller R, Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative evidence. Psychological Medicine 2009; 39: 705-712.
13. Mitchell N, Gordon PK. Attitudes towards computerized CBT for depression amongst a student population. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 2007; 35: 421-430. (Pubitemid 47026209)
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression and Anxiety - Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CCBT). Available from URL: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA97.