Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 39-47

  Wenz, Hans Jürgen ^a   Reuter, Hans Ulrich ^b   Hertrampf, Katrin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b Campus Kiel ^*

Author keywords

Dental implants; Impression materials; Impression technique; Transfer coping

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 40849137885     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
2. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
3. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-457.
4. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61.
5. Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: Longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:748-755.
6. Lambrecht JT, Filippi A, Kunzel AR, Schiel HJ. Long-term evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged ITI solid-screw titanium implants: A 10-year life table analysis of 468 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:826-834.
7. Perry J, Lenchewski E. Clinical performance and 5-year retrospective evaluation of Frialit-2 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:887-891.
8. Strietzel FP, Lange KP, Svegar M, Hartmann HJ, Kuchler I. Retrospective evaluation of the success of oral rehabilitation using the Frialit-2 implant system. Part 1: Influence of topographic and surgical parameters. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:187-194.
9. Eckert SE, Choi YG, Sanchez AR, Koka S. Comparison of dental implant systems: Quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:406-415.
10. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: Effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-888.
11. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-509.
12. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:216-222.
13. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:470-476.
14. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-366.
15. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:588-593.
16. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:186-192.
17. Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-447.
18. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-561.
19. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75.
20. Dumbrigue HB, Gurun DC, Javid NS. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:108-110.
21. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-198.
22. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:331-336.
23. Akca K, Cehreli MC. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:517-523.
24. Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik JS. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:377-383.
25. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-455.
26. Bambini F, Ginnetti L, Meme L, Pellecchia M, Selvaggio R. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect implant impression techniques an in vitro study. An in vitro study. Minerva Stomatol 2005;54:395-402.
27. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:629-638.
28. Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-331.
29. Lehmann K, Lindemann J. Die Wiedergabe des Pfeilerabstandes bei der Abformung für festsitzenden Zahnersatz. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1980;35:537-539.
30. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-178.
31. Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:371-375.
32. Rubenstein JE, Ma T. Comparison of interface relationships between implant components for laser-welded titanium frameworks and standard cast frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:491-495.
33. Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:511-516.
34. Michaels GC, Carr AB, Larsen PE. Effect of prosthetic superstructure accuracy on the osseointegrated implant bone interface. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol Endod 1997;83:198-205.
35. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:500-509.
36. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:425-431.
37. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:620-625.
38. Lie A, Jemt T. Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions. Description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:30-36.
39. Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:314-325.
40. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Photogrammetry - An alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:363-368.
41. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Bäck T. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: A comparative laboratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:43-50.
42. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-246.
43. Weigl P, Lauer HC. Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures: Ceramic vs. electroplated gold copings: Part II. Clinical effects. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:337-347.