Sympatric cryptic species in the crinoid genus Cenolia (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Comasteridae) delineated by sequence and microsatellite markers

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 160-171

  Naughton, K M ^a,b   O'Hara, T D ^a   Appleton, B ^b,e   Gardner, M G ^c,d  

^a MUSEUM VICTORIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

^e DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Crinoid; Cryptic species; Microsatellite; Molecular; Phylogeny; Sympatry

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; AUSTRALIA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECHINODERM; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SYMPATRY;

ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECHINODERMATA; GENE FLOW; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SYMPATRY;

EID: 84901954046     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Améziane N., Roux M. Environmental control versus phylogenic fingerprint in ontogeny: the example of the development of the stalk in the genus Guillecrinus (stalked crinoids, Echinodermata). J. Nat. History 2005, 39:2815-2860.
2. Ayre D.J., Minchinton T.E., Perrin C. Does life history predict past and current connectivity for rocky intertidal invertebrates across a marine biogeographic barrier?. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:1887-1903.
3. Bastos-Silveira C., Santos S.M., Monarca R., Mathias M.D.L., Heckel G. Deep mitochondrial introgression and hybridization among ecologically divergent vole species. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:5309-5323.
4. Benjamini Y., Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 2001, 2001:1165-1188.
5. Blanquer A., Uriz M.J., Agell G. Hidden diversity in sympatric sponges: adjusting life-history dynamics to share substrate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 371:109-115.
6. Brown J.M., Hedtke S.M., Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:145-161.
7. Bucklin A., Steinke D., Blanco-Bercial L. DNA barcoding of marine metazoa. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2011, 3:471-508.
8. Byrne M., Hart M.W., Cerra A., Cisternas P. Reproduction and larval morphology of broadcasting and viviparous species in the Cryptasterina species complex. Biol. Bull. 2003, 205:285-294.
9. Carpenter, P.H., 1888. In: Report on the Crinoidea collected during the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873-1876. Part II. The Comatulae.
10. Clark A.H. The first New Zealand crinoid. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1916, 29:48. Plate 48.
11. Clark, H.L., 1916. In: Report on the sea-lilies, starfishes, brittle-stars and sea urchins obtained by the F.I.S. "Endeavour" on the coasts of Queensland, New South Wales, Tasmania, Victoria, South Australia, and Western Australia. Biological Results Fishing Experiments, F.I.S. "Endeavour" 1909-14. 4, pp. 1-123.
12. Clark A.H. A new crinoid from New Zealand, and another from Tasmania. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1918, 31:41-44. Plate 42.
13. Clark A.H. A monograph of the existing crinoids. Superfamily Comasterida. Smithsonian Inst. US Natl. Museum Bull. 1931, 82:816. Plate 82.
14. Coleman A.W., Suarez A., Goff L.J. Molecular delineation of species and syngens in volvocacean green algae (Chlorophyta). J. Phycol. 1994, 30:80-90.
15. Colgan D.J., Schreiter S. Extrinsic and intrinsic influences on the phylogeography of the Austrocochlea constricta species group. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010, 397:44-51.
16. Costello M.J., Wilson S., Houlding B. Predicting total global species richness using rates of species description and estimates of taxonomic effort. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:871-883.
17. Darling J.A. Interspecific hybridization and mitochondrial introgression in invasive Carcinus shore crabs. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17828.
18. Dawson M.N. Incipient speciation of Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae, Catostylidae), comparative phylogeography and biogeography in south-east Australia. J. Biogeogr. 2005, 32:515-533.
19. Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003, 164:1567-1587.
20. Frade P.R., Reyes-Nivia M.C., Faria J., Kaandorp J.A., Luttikhuizen P.C., Bak R.P.M. Semi-permeable boundaries in the coral genus Madracis: introgression in a brooding coral system. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57:1072-1090.
21. Gardner M.G., Fitch A.J., Bertozzi T., Lowe A.J. Rise of the machines - recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11:1093-1101.
22. Golding R.E., Colgan D.J., Nelmes G., Reutelshöfer T. Sympatry and allopatry in the deeply divergent mitochondrial DNA clades of the estuarine pulmonate gastropod genus Phallomedusa (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Mar. Biol. 2011, 158:1259-1269.
23. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:696-704.
24. Haig J.A., Rouse G.W. Larval development of the featherstar Aporometra wilsoni (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Invertebr. Biol. 2008, 127:460-469.
25. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acid Sympos. Ser. 1998, 41:95-98.
26. Hart M.W., Keever C.C., Dartnall A.J., Byrne M. Morphological and genetic variation indicate cryptic species within Lamarck's little sea star, Parvulastra (= Patiriella) exigua. Biol. Bull. 2006, 210:158-167.
27. Helgen L.E., Rouse G.W. Species delimitation and distribution in Aporometra (Crinoidea: Echinodermata): endemic Australian featherstars. Invertebr. Syst. 2006, 20:395-414.
28. Hemery L.G., Eléaume M., Roussel V., Améziane N., Gallut C., Steinke D., Cruaud C., Couloux A., Wilson N.G. Comprehensive sampling reveals circumpolarity and sympatry in seven mitochondrial lineages of the Southern Ocean crinoid species Promachocrinus kerguelensis (Echinodermata). Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:2502-2518.
29. Hemery L.G., Roux M., Améziane N., Eléaume M. High-resolution crinoid phyletic inter-relationships derived from molecular data. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2013, 54:511-523.
30. Hillis D.M., Dixon M.T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 1991, 66:411-453.
31. Hoareau T.B., Boissin E. Design of phylum-specific hybrid primers for DNA barcoding: addressing the need for efficient COI amplification in the Echinodermata. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10:960-967.
32. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
33. Jones E.B.G. Are there more marine fungi to be described?. Bot. Mar. 2011, 54:343-354.
34. Knowlton N. Molecular genetic analyses of species boundaries in the sea. Hydrobiologia 2000, 420:73-90.
35. Kohtsuka H., Nakano H. Development and growth of the feather star Decametra tigrina (Crinoidea), with emphasis on the morphological differences between adults and juveniles. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2005, 85:1503-1510.
36. Kraft L.G.K., Kraft G.T., Waller R.F. Investigations into southern Australian Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) taxonomy and molecular phylogeny indicate both cosmopolitanism and endemic cryptic species. J. Phycol. 2010, 46:1257-1277.
37. Lamarck J.B.P. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, présentant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent 1816, Verdière, Paris.
38. Lambeck K., Chappell J. Sea level change through the last glacial cycle. Science 2001, 292:679-686.
39. Levin L.A. Recent progress in understanding larval dispersal: new directions and digressions. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2006, 46:282-297.
40. Lewis, P.O., Zaykin, D., 2002. Genetic Data Analysis: Computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.1. Free program distributed by the authors over the internet from http://www.hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis/software.php.
41. Li J., Ó Foighil D., Park J.-K. Triton's trident: cryptic Neogene divergences in a marine clam (Lasaea australis) correspond to Australia's three temperate biogeographic provinces. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:1933-1946.
42. Marshall D.C. Cryptic failure of partitioned Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: lost in the land of long trees. Syst. Biol. 2009, 59:108-117.
43. McEdward L.R., Miner B.G. Larval and life-cycle patterns in echinoderms. Can. J. Zool. 2001, 79:1125-1170.
44. Meglécz E., Costedoat C., Dubut V., Gilles A., Malausa T., Pech N., Martin J.F. QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:403-404.
45. Mercier A., Sewell M.A., Hamel J.-F. Pelagic propagule duration and developmental mode: reassessment of a fading link. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 22:517-530.
46. Messing C.G. Brooding and paedomorphosis in the deep-water feather star Comatilia iridometriformis (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Mar. Biol. 1984, 80:83-91.
47. Messing C.G. A key to the genera of Comasteridae (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) with the description of a new genus. Bull. Biol. Soc. Wash. 2001, 10:277-300.
48. Messing C.G. Three new species of Comasteridae (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) from the tropical western Pacific. Zoosystema 2003, 25:149-162.
49. Morgan E.M.J., Green B.S., Murphy N.P., Strugnell J.M. Investigation of genetic structure between deep and shallow populations of the southern rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii in Tasmania, Australia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e77978.
50. Müller J. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Arten der Comatulen. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Berlin 1843, 9:131-136.
51. Müller J. Nachtrag zu der Abhandlungen über die Comatulen. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Koniglichen. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1846, 1846:177-179. Plate 178.
52. Nakano H., Hibino T., Oji T., Hara Y., Amemiya S. Larval stages of a living sea lily (stalked crinoid echinoderm). Nature 2003, 421:158-160.
53. Narum S.R. Beyond Bonferroni: Less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 2006, 7:783-787.
54. Naughton K.M., O'Hara T.D. A new brooding species of the biscuit star Tosia (Echinodermata: Asteroidea: Goniasteridae), distinguished by molecular, morphological and larval characters. Invertebr. Syst. 2009, 23:348-366.
55. O'Hara T.D., Poore G.C.B. Patterns of distribution for southern Australian marine echinoderms and decapods. J. Biogeogr. 2000, 27:1321-1335.
56. Owen C.L., Messing C.G., Rouse G.W., Shivji M.S. Using a combined approach to explain the morphological and ecological diversity in Phanogenia gracilis Hartlaub, 1893 (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) sensu lato: two species or intraspecific variation?. Mar. Biol. 2009, 156:1517-1529.
57. Palumbi S.R. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1994, 547-572.
58. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6:288-295.
59. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:2537-2539.
60. Phillips J.A. Marine macroalgal biodiversity hotspots: why is there high species richness and endemism in southern Australian marine benthic flora?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001, 10:1555-1577.
61. Pola M., Comacho-Garciá, Gosliner T.M. Molecular data illuminate cryptic nudibranch species: the evolution of the Scyllaeidae (Nudibranchia: Dendronotina) with a revision of Notobryon. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 165:311-336.
62. Poore G.C.B., Bruce N.L. Global diversity of marine isopods (except asellota and crustacean symbionts). PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e43529.
63. Posada D. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
64. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
65. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2007. Tracer v1.5. Available from http://www.beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
66. Rannala B., Zhu T., Yang Z. Tail paradox, partial identifiability, and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 29:325-335.
67. Ray J.M., Lang N.J., Wood R.M., Mayden R.L. History repeated: recent and historical mitochondrial introgression between the current darter Etheostoma uniporum and rainbow darter Etheostoma caeruleum (Teleostei: Percidae). J. Fish Biol. 2008, 72:418-434.
68. Redondo R.A.F., Brina L.P.S., Silva R.F., Ditchfield A.D., Santos F.R. Molecular systematics of the genus Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:44-58.
69. Rocha L.A., Craig M.T., Bowen B.W. Phylogeography and the conservation of coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 2007, 26:501-512.
70. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Hohna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:539-542.
71. Rouse G.W., Jermiin L.S., Wilson N.G., Eeckhaut I., Lanterbecq D., Oji T., Young C.M., Browning T., Cisternas P., Helgen L.E., Stuckey M., Messing C.G. Fixed, free, and fixed: the fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian-Triassic origin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66:161-181.
72. Roux M., Eléaume M., Hemery L.G., Améziane N. When morphology meets molecular data in crinoid phylogeny: a challenge. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2013, 54:511-523.
73. Rowe F.W.E., Gates J. Echinodermata 1995, Australian Biological Resources Study/CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, p. 510.
74. Rowe F.W.E., Hoggett A.K., Birtles R.A., Vail L.L. Revision of some comasterid genera from Australia (Echinodermata: Crinoidea), with descriptions of two new genera and nine new species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1986, 86:197-277.
75. Schuelke M. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:233-234.
76. Smith B.T., Escalante P., Baños B.E.H., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Rohwer S., Klicka J. The role of historical and contemporary processes on phylogeographic structure and genetic diversity in the Northern Cardinal, Cardinalis cardinalis. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11:136.
77. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
78. Stamatakis A., Ott M. Efficient computation of the phylogenetic likelihood function on multi-gene alignments and multi-core architectures. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:3977-3984.
79. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:758-771.
80. Sweijd N.A., Bowie R.C.K., Evans B.S., Lopata A.L. Molecular genetics and the management and conservation of marine organisms. Hydrobiologia 2000, 420:153-164.
81. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2731-2739.
82. Thomas L., Bell J.J. Testing the consistency of connectivity patterns for a widely dispersing marine species. Heredity 2013, 111:345-354.
83. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
84. Torrence K.G., Correia M.G., Hoffman E.A. Divergent sympatric lineages of the Atlantic and Indian Ocean crinoid Tropiometra carinata. Invertebr. Biol. 2012, 131:355-365.
85. Uthicke S., Byrne M., Conand C. Genetic barcoding of commercial Bêche-de-mer species (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 10:634-646.
86. Van Soest R.W.M., Boury-Esnault N., Vacelet J., Dohrmann M., Erpenbeck D., De Voogd N.J., Santodomingo N., Vanhoorne B., Kelly M., Hooper J.N.A. Global diversity of sponges (Porifera). PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e35105.
87. Waples R.S., Punt A.E., Cope J.M. Integrating genetic data into management of marine resources: how can we do it better?. Fish Fish. 2008, 9:423-449.
88. Ward R.D., Holmes B.H., O'Hara T.D. DNA barcoding discriminates echinoderm species. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8:1202-1211.
89. Waters J.M., Roy M.S. Global phylogeography of the fissiparous sea-star genus Coscinasterias. Mar. Biol. 2003, 142:185-191.
90. Waters J.M., Esa Y.B., Wallis G.P. Genetic and morphological evidence for reproductive isolation between sympatric populations of Galaxias (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) in South Island, New Zealand. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2001, 73:287-298.
91. Waters J.M., O'Loughlin P.M., Roy M.S. Cladogenesis in a starfish species complex from southern Australia: evidence for vicariant speciation?. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 32:236-245.
92. Waters J.M., King T.M., O'loughlin P.M., Spencer H.G. Phylogeographical disjunction in abundant high-dispersal littoral gastropods. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2789-2802.
93. Wilson N.G., Hunter R.L., Lockhart S.J., Halanych K.M. Multiple lineages and absence of panmixia in the "circumpolar" crinoid Promachocrinus kerguelensis from the Atlantic sector of Antarctica. Mar. Biol. 2007, 152:895-904.
94. Wilton C.P.N. Art. III. On a new species of encrinite (Encrinus Australis). Tasmanian J. Nat. Sci. 1843, 2:118-120.