High-resolution crinoid phyletic inter-relationships derived from molecular data

Cahiers de Biologie Marine

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 511-523

  Hemery, Lenaig G ^a   Roux, Michel ^a   Ameziane, Nadia ^a   Eleaume, Marc ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Comatulids; Crinoidea; Echinodermata; Molecular phylogeny; Stalked crinoids

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ECHINODERM; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENY; RESOLUTION;

EID: 84888228497     PISSN: 00079723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Améziane N., Bourseau J.P., Heinzeller T. & Roux M. 1999. Les genres Cyathidium et Holopus au sein des Cyrtocrinida (Crinoidea; Echinodermata). Journal of Natural History, 33: 439-470.
2. Améziane N. & Roux M. 2005. Environmental control versus phylogenic fingerprint in ontogeny: The example of the development of the stalk in the genus Guillecrinus (stalked crinoids, Echinodermata). Journal of Natural History, 39: 28 15-2859.
3. Améziane-Cominardi N., Bourseau J.P., Avocat R. & Roux M. 1990. Les crinoldes pédonculés de Nouvelle-Calédonie Inventaire et réflexions sur les taxons archaIques. In: Echinoderm Research, Proceedings 2nd European Conference Echinoderms Brussels (C. de Ridder, P. Dubois, M.C. Lahaye & M. Jangoux eds), pp. 117-124. Balkema: Rotterdam. .
4. Améziane-Cominardi N. & Roux M. 1994. Ontogenèse de Ia structure en mosaIque du squelette des crinoldes pédonculés actuels : consequence pour Ia biologie évolutive et Ia taxonomie. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Echinoderm Conference (B. David, A., Guille, J.P. Feral & M. Roux eds), pp. 185-190. Balkema: Rotterdam.
5. Bohn J.M. & Heinzeller T. 1999. Morphology of the bourgueticrinid and isocrinid aboral nervous system and its possible phylogenetic implications (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Acta Zoologica, 80: 24 1-249.
6. Bourseau J.P., Avocat R., Améziane-Cominardi N. & Roux M. 1991. Crinoides pédonculés de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Mémoire du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, 8: 230-333.
7. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17: 540-552.
8. Clark A.H. 1914. Une étude philosophique de Ia relation entre les crinoldes actuels et Ia temperature de leur habitat. Bulletin de I 'Institut Océanographique de Monaco, 294: 1-1 1.
9. Clark A.H. 1915. A monograph Die crinoiden der Antarktis. Deutche Südpolar-Expedition, 16, Zoologie, 8: 101-209.
10. Clark A.H. 1947. A monograph of the existing crinoids, Vol. 1: The comatulids, part 4b, Superfamily Mariametrida (concluded-the family Colobometridae) and superfamily Tropiometrida. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82: 1-459.
11. Clark A.H. 1950. A monograph of the existing crinoids, Vol. 1: The comatulids, part 4c, Superfamily Tropiometrida (the families Thalassometridae and Charitometridae). Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82: 1-383.
12. Clark A.H. & Clark A.M. 1967. A monograph of the existing crinoids, Vol. 1: the comatulids, part 5, Suborders Oligophreata (concluded) and Macrophreata. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 82: 1-795.
13. Cohen B.L., Améziane N., Eléaume M. & Richer de Forges B. 2004. Crinoid phylogeny: a preliminary analysis (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 144: 605-6 17.
14. David J., Roux M., Messing C.G. & Améziane N. 2006. Revision of the pentacrinid stalked crinoids of the genus Endoxocrinus (Echinodennata, Crinoidea), with a study of environmental control of characters and its consequences for taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1156: 1-50.
15. Eléaume M. 2006. Approche morphométrique de Ia variabilité phenotypique : consequences systématiques et évolutives. Application aux crinoides actuels (Crinoidea : Echinodermata). PhD dissertation, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris: 402 pp
16. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R. & Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxydase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3: 294-299.
17. Giribet G., Carranza S., Baguna J., Riutort M. & Ribera C. 1996. First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda dade. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13: 76-84.
18. Gislén T. 1939. On the young of a stalked deep-sea crinoid and the affinities of the Hyocrinidae. Lunds Universitets Arssjkrfl (new series, part 2), 34: 1-18.
19. Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41: 95-98.
20. Heinzeller T. 1998. The nervous system of crinoids: survey and taxonomic implications. In: Echinoderms: San Francisco (Mooi & Telford eds), pp. 169-174. Balkema: Rotterdam.
21. Helgen L.E. & Rouse G.W. 2006. Species delimitation and distribution in Aporometra (Crinoidea: Echinodermata): endemic Australian featherstars. In vertebrate Systematics, 20: 395-414.
22. Hemery L.G. 2011. Diversité moléculaire, phylogéographie et phylogénie des Crinoldes (Echinodermes) dans un environnement extreme : l'océan Austral. PhD dissertation, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. 381 pp.
23. Hemery L.G., Eléaume M., Roussel V., Améziane N., Gallut C., Steinke D., Cruaud C., Couloux A. & Wilson N.G. 2012. Comprehensive sampling reveals circumpolarity and sympatry in seven mitochondrial lineages of the Southern Ocean crinoid species Promachocrinus kerguelensis (Echinodermata). Molecular Ecology, 21: 2502-25 18.
24. Hess H. & Messing C.G. 2011. Part T, Echinodermata 2, revised Crinoidea, Volume 3. In: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, (P.A. Selden ed), University of Kansas Press: Lawrence, Kansas. 261 pp.
25. Hess P.N. & De Moraes Russo C.A. 2007. An empirical test of the midpoint rooting method. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92: 669-674.
26. Janies D. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of extant echinoderm classes. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79: 1232-1250.
27. Kohtsuka H. & Nakano H. 2005. Development and growth of the feather star Decametra tigrina (Crinoidea), with emphasis on the morphological differences between adults and juveniles. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85: 1503-15 10.
28. Messing C.G. 1981. Reclassification and redescription of the comatulid Comatonia cristata (Hartlaub) (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 94: 240-253.
29. Messing C.G. 1997. Living Comatulids. In: Geobiology of Echinoderms (J. Waters & C. Maples eds). Paleontological Society Papers, 3: 3-30.
30. Messing C.G. 2003. Unique morphology in the living bathyal feather star, Atelecrinus (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Invertebrate Biology, 122: 280-292.
31. Messing C.G. & White C.M. 2001. A revision of the Zenometridae (new rank) (Echinodermata, Crinoidea, L.G. HEMERY, M. ROUX, N. Comatulidina). Zoologica Scripta, 30: 159-180.
32. Meyer DL. 1972. Ctenantedon, a new antedonid crinoid convergent with comasterids. Bulletin of Marine Sc fence, 22: 53-66.
33. Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W. & Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), pp 1-8. New Orleans.
34. Mironov A.N. & Sorokina O.A. 1998. Sea lilies of the order Hyocrinida (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Zoologicheskie Issledovania, 2: 1-117.
35. Owen C.L., Messing C.G., Rouse G.W. & Shivji M.S. 2009. Using a combined approach to explain the morphological and ecological diversity in Phanogenia gracilis Hartlaub, 1893 (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) sensu lato: two species or intraspecific variation? Marine Biology, 156: 15 17-1529.
36. Perseke M., Bernhard D., Fritzsch C., Brümmer F., Stadler P.F. & Schiegel M. 2010. Mitochondrial genome evolution in Ophiuroidea, Echinoidea and Holothuroidea: insights in phylogenetic relationships of Echinodermata. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56: 201-211.
37. Rambaut A. & Drummond A.J. 2007. MCMC Trace Analysis Tool Version vl.5.0, 2003-2009.
38. Rasmussen H.W. 1978. Evolution of articulate crinoids. Part T. Echinodermata. In: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (R.C. Moore & C. Teichert eds), 2: T302-T316. Geological Society of America: Boulder.
39. Rasmussen H.W. & Sieverts-Doreck H. 1978. Articulata Classification. In: Treatise on In vertebrate Paleontology (R.C. Moore & C. Teichert eds), 2: T8l3-T928. Geological Society of America: Boulder.
40. Rodriguez F., Olivier J.L., Mann A. & Medina J.R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 142: 485-501.
41. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. & Van der Mark P. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual: 1-69.
42. Rouse G.W., Jermiin L., Wilson N.G., Eeckhaut L., Lanterbecq D., Oji T., Young C.M., Browning T., Cisternas P., Helgen L., Stuckey M. & Messing C.G. 2013. Fixed, free and fixed: the fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinoderma) and their Permian-Triassic origin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66: 161-181.
43. Roux M. 1981. Echinodermes: Crinoldes lsocrinidae. Mémoires ORSTOM, 91: 477-543.
44. Roux M., Améziane N. & Eléaume M. 2009. The genus Teliocrinus (Crinoidea, Echinodermata): a key taxon among pentacrinid stalked crinoids. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 155: 22-39.
45. Roux M., Eléaume M., Hemery L.G. & Améziane N. 2013. When morphology meets molecular data in crinoid phylogeny: a challenge. Cahiers de Biology Marine, 541-549.
46. Roux M., Messing C.G. & Améziane N. 2002. Artificial keys to the genera of living stalked crinoids (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 70: 799-830.
47. Sieverts-Doreck H. 1953. Cyrtocrinida. In: Traité de Paléontologie (J. Piveateau ed), 3, pp. 763-765. Masson: Paris.
48. Simms M.J. 1988. The phylogeny of post-Paleozoic crinoids. In: Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionnary Biology (C.R.C. Paul & A.B. Smith eds), pp. 269-284. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
49. Simms M.J., Gale A.S., Guilliland P., Rose E.P.F. & Sevastopulo G.D. 1993. Echinodermata. In: The fossil record 2 (M.J. Benton ed), 25: 49 1-528. Chapman & Hall: London.
50. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22: 2688-2690.
51. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. & Kumar 5. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi: 10.1 093/molbev/msrl 21.
52. Wada H. & Satoh N. 1994. Phylogenetic relationship among extant classes of Echinoderms, as inferred from sequences of 18 rDNA, coincide with relationships deduced from the fossil record. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 38: 41-49.
53. Whiting M.F., Carpenter J.C., Wheeler Q.D. & Wheeler W.C. 1997. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the Holometabolous insect orders inferred from l8S and 28S tibosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology,46: 1-68.