When morphology meets molecular data in crinoid phylogeny: A challenge

Cahiers de Biologie Marine

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 541-548

  Roux, Michel ^a   Eleaume, Marc ^a   Hemery, Lenaig G ^a   Ameziane, Nadia ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Comatulids; Crinoidea; Echinodermata; Homoplasy; Ontogeny; Paedomorphy; Phylogeny; Stalked crinoids

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ECHINODERM; FOSSIL RECORD; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; ONTOGENY; ORDOVICIAN; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84888216906     PISSN: 00079723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Améziane-Cominardi N. 1991. Distribution des Pentacrines du Pacifique Occidental. Essai de modélisation et d'application aux faunes du Lias. Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie, UniversitédeLyon, 116: 1-153.
2. Améziane N. & Roux M. 1997. Biodiversity and historical biogeography of stalked crinoids (Echinodermata) in the deep sea. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6: 1557-1570.
3. Améziane N., Bourseau J.P., Heinzeller T. & Roux M. 1999. Les genres Cyathidium et Ho/opus au sein des Cyrtocrinida (Crinoidea, Echinodermata). Journal of Natural History, 33: 439-470.
4. Améziane N. & Roux M. 2005. Environmental control versus phylogenic fingerprint in ontogeny: the example of the development of the stalk in the genus Guillecrinus (stalked crinoids, Echinodermata). Journal of Natural History, 39: 28 15-2859.
5. Améziane-Cominardi N. & Roux M. 1994. Ontogenèse de Ia structure en mosaIque du squelette des crinoldes pédonculés actuels. Consequences pour Ia biologie évolutive et Ia taxonomie. In: Echinoderms through Time (B. David, A. Guille, J.P. Feral & M. Roux eds), pp. 185-190. A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam.
6. Ausich WI. 1996. Crinoid plate circlet homologies. Journal of Paleontology, 70: 955-964.
7. Bourseau J.P., Améziane-Cominardi N., Avocat R. & Roux M. 1991. Echinodermata: les crinoldes pédonculés de NouvelleCalédonie. In: Résultats des campagnes MUSORSTOM, 8 (A. Crosnier ed), vol. 151. pp 229-333. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle: Paris.
8. CIarkA.H. 1915. Die crinoiden derAntarktis. DeutcheSü dpolarExpedition 1901-1903, 16, Zoology, 8: 102-2 10.
9. Cohen B.L., Améziane N., Eléaume M. & Richer de Forges B. 2004. Crinoid phylogeny: a preliminary analysis (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 144: 605-6 17.
10. David J., Roux M., Messing C.G. & Améziane N. 2006. Revision of the pentacrinid stalked crinoids of the genus Endoxocrinus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea), with a study of environmental control of characters and its consequence for taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1156: 1-50.
11. Eléaume M., Bohn J.M., Roux M. & Améziane N. 2012. Stalked crinoids (Echinodermata) collected by the R/V Polarstern and Meteor cruises in the south Atlantic and Antarctica. Zootaxa, 3425: 1-22.
12. Eléaume M., Hemery L.G., Bowden D. & Roux M. 2011. A large new species of the genus Ptilocrinus (Echinodermata, stalked Crinoidea, l-lyocrinidae) from Antarctic seamount. Polar Biology, 34: 1385-1397.
13. Gislén T. 1939. On the young of a stalked deep-sea crinoid and the affinities of the Hyocrinidae. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, NE, 2,34, 17: 1-18.
14. Gould S.J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Havard University Press, Cambridge: 501 pp.
15. Guensburg T.E. 2012. Phylogenic implication of the oldest crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 86: 455-461.
16. Guensburg T.E. & Sprinkle J. 2003. The oldest known crinoids (Early Ordovician, Utah) and a new crinoids plate homology system. Bulletins ofAmerican Paleontology, 364: 1-43.
17. Hemery L.G. 2011. Diversité moléculaire, phylogénie et phylogéographie des Crinoldes (Echinodermes) dans un environnement extreme: l'océan Austral. These (PhD), Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris: 381 pp.
18. Hemery L.G., Roux M., Améziane N. & Eléaume M. 2013. High-resolution crinoid phyletic inter-relationships derived from molecular data. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 54: 511-523.
19. Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana: 263 pp.
20. Hess H., Messing C.G. & Ausich W.I. 2011. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part 7: Echinodermata 2, Revised Crinoidea, 3 (P.A. Selden ed). Paleontological Institute: University of Kansas. 261 pp.
21. Kupiec J.J. 1997. A Darwinian theory for the origin of cellular differentiation. Molecular and General Genetics, 225: 201-208.
22. Kupiec J.J. 2008. L 'origine des individus. Fayard: Paris: 316 pp. Mironov A.N. & Sorokina O.A. 1998. Sea lilies of the order 1-lyocrinida (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Zoologicheskie Issledovanfa, 2: 1-117 (in Russian).
23. Mool R. & David B. 1997. Skeletal homologies in Echinoderms. Paleontological Society Papers, 3: 305-335.
24. Paul C.R.C. & Smith A.B. 1984. The early radiation and phylogeny of echinoderms. Biological reviews, 59: 443-481.
25. Rouse G.W., Jermiin L., Wilson N.G., Eeckhaut I., Lanterbecq D., Oji T., Young C.M., Browning T., Cisternas P., Helgen L., Stuckey M. & Messing C.G. 2013. Fixed, free and fixed: The fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinoderma) and their Permian-Triassic origin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66: 161-181.
26. Roux M. 1987. Evolutionary ecology and biogeography of recent stalked crinoids as a model for the fossil record. In: Echinoderm Studies (M. Jangoux & J.M. Lawrence ed), pp. I-53. A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam.
27. Roux M. 1997. Classification et ontogenèse chez les crinoldes une revision nécessaire de Ia hierarchic des caractères. Bulletin de Ia Société zoologique de France, 122: 371-378.
28. Roux M., Améziane N. & David J. 1997. Compromis adaptatifs et ontogenèse chez les CrinoIdes pédonculés. Géobios, Lyon, M.S., 21: 3 19-327.
29. Roux M. & Lambert P. 2011. Two new species of stalked crinoids from the north-eastern Pacific in the genera Gephyrocrinus and Ptilocrinus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea, Hyocrinidae). Effects of ontogeny and variability on hyocrinid taxonomy. Zootaxa, 2825: 1-54.
30. Simms M.J. 1994. Reinterpretation of thecal plate homology and phylogeny in the class Crinoidea. Lethaia, 26: 303-312.
31. Simms M.J. & Sevastopulos G.D. 1993. The origin of articulate crinoids. Paleontology, 36: 91-109.
32. Thomas J.A., Welch J.J., Lanfear R. & Bromham L. 2010. A generation time effect on the rate of molecular evolution in invertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27: 1173-1180.
33. Webster G.D. & Jell P.A. 1999. New Permian crinoids from Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 43: 279-339.