Q-TAM: A quality technology acceptance model for technology operations managers

Operations Management Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 13-23

  Boakye, Kwabena G ^a   McGinnis, Thomas ^b   Prybutok, Victor R ^c  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Attribute quality; Customer acceptance; Product quality; Quality technology acceptance model; Reliability quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901827237     PISSN: 19369735     EISSN: 19369743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12063-014-0085-x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA (1992) Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quart 16(2): 227-248.
2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
3. Andreev P, Heart T, Maoz H, Pliskin N (2009) Validating formative Partial Least Squares (PLS) models: Methodological review and empirical illustration, in Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems. Phoenix, Arizona.
4. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail survey. J Mark Res 14(3): 396-402.
5. Ba S, Johansson WC (2008) An exploratory study of the impact of e-service process on online customer satisfaction. Prod Oper Manag 17(1): 107-119.
6. Babakus E, Beinstock CC, van Scotter JR (2006) Linking perceived quality and customer satisfaction to store traffic and revenue growth. Decis Sci 35(4): 713-737.
7. Barclay D (1991) Interdepartmental conflict in organizational buying: the impact of the organizational context. J Mark Res 28(2): 145-159.
8. Becker JM, Klein K, Wetzels W (2012) Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Plan 45(5/6): 359-394.
9. Bhattacherjee A (2001) An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis Support Syst 32(2): 201-214.
10. Boakye KG, Prybutok VR, Ryan SD (2012) The intention of continued web-enabled phone service usage: a quality perspective. Oper Manage Res 5(1): 14-24.
11. Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2012) Expectation confirmation in technology use. Inf Syst Res 23(2): 474-487.
12. Chin WW, Todd PA (1995) On the use, usefulness and ease of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quart 19(2): 237-246.
13. Chin WW, Marcolin B, Newsted P (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res 14(2): 189-217.
14. Chordas L (2001) A new generation in the cross hairs. Best's Rev 101(10): 49-54.
15. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
16. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance. MIS Quart 13(3): 319-340.
17. Davis FD, Venkatesh V (2004) Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51(1): 31-46.
18. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8): 982-1003.
19. DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent. Inf Syst Res 3(3): 60-95.
20. Delone WH, McLean ER (2003) The Delone and McLean model of information system success: a ten year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4): 9-30.
21. Devaraj S, Fan M, Kohli R (2002) Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics. Inf Syst Res 13(3): 316-333.
22. Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Mark Res 38(2): 269-277.
23. Dishaw MT, Strong DM (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inf Manag 36(1): 9-21.
24. Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D (1991) The effects of price brand and store information on buyers' product evaluations. J Mark Res 28(3): 307-319.
25. Fabrigar LR, MacCallum RC, Wegner DT, Strahan EJ (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 4(3): 272-299.
26. Fayad ME, Schmidt DC (1997) Object-oriented application frameworks. Commun ACM 40(10): 32-38.
27. Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1): 39-50.
28. Garvin D (1984) What does product quality really mean? Sloan Manag Rev 26(1): 25-43.
29. Garvin D (1987) Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harv Bus Rev 65(6): 101-109.
30. Gefen D, Straub DW (2000) The relative importance of perceived ease-of use-in IS acceptance: a study of e-commerce acceptance. J Assoc Inf Syst 1(8): 1-30.
31. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 50(3): 307-321.
32. Golder PN, Mitra D, Moorman C (2012) What is quality? An integrative framework of process and states. J Mark 76(4): 1-23.
33. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40(3): 414-433.
34. Harlam BA, Krishna A, Lehmann DR, Mela C (1995) Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarirty on purchase intention. J Bus Res 33(1): 57-66.
35. Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Henseler J, Fassott G (2009) Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures. In: Vinzi EV, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of PLS and marketing. Springer, Berlin.
37. Hitt LM, Wue X, Zhou X (2002) Investment in enterprise resource planning: business impact and productivity measures. J Inf Syst 19(1): 71-98.
38. Hong SJ, Thong JYL, Moon JY, Tam KY (2008) Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers. Inf Syst Front 10(4): 431-445.
39. Huang EM, Truong KN (2008) Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: Opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. Proc CHI'08. ACM. 323-332.
40. Juran JM (1974) Quality control handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
41. Kano N, Seraku K, Takahashi F, Tsuji S (1984) Attractive quality and must-be quality. J Jpn Soc Qual Control 14(2): 39-48.
42. Keil M, Tan BCY, Wei KK, Saarinen T, Tuunaien V, Wassenaar A (2000) A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quart 24(2): 299-325.
43. Landrum H, Prybutok VR (2004) A service quality and success model for the information service industry. Eur J Oper Res 153(3): 628-642.
44. Lippert SK, Forman H (2005) Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(3): 363-381.
45. Lu J, Liu C, Yu CS, Yao JE (2003) Exploring the factors associated with wireless internet via mobile technology acceptance in mainland China. Commun Int Inf Manag Assoc 3(1): 101-120.
46. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Jarvis CB (2005) The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioural and organizational research and some recommended solutions. J Appl Psychol 90(4): 710-730.
47. Martesen A (2007) Tweens' satisfaction and brand loyalty in the mobile phone market. Young Consum 8(2): 106-116.
48. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
49. Oakes W (1972) External validity and the use of real people as subjects. Am Psychol 27(10): 956-962.
50. Peng DX, Lai F (2012) Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J Oper Manag 30(6): 467-480.
51. Petter S, DeLone W, McLean E (2008) Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur J Inf Syst 17(3): 236-263.
52. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5): 879-903.
53. Power and Associates, JD (2007) Wireless customers are keeping their mobile phones longer as term contracts impact the replacement cycle. WestLake Village. http://businesscenter. jdpower. com/news/pressrelease. aspx?ID=2007079. Accessed 15 November 2012.
54. Ringle SM, Sarstedt M, Straub D (2012) A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quart 36(1): 3-14.
55. Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A, Chowa C (2006) Information systems success: individuals and organizational determinants. Manag Sci 52(12): 1849-1864.
56. Schenkman BN, Jonsson FU (2000) Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behav Inf Technol 19(5): 367-377.
57. Schultz DP (1969) The human subject in psychological research. Psychol Bull 72(3): 214-228.
58. Scott JE, Walczak S (2009) Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Inf Manag 46(4): 221-232.
59. Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone an McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 8(3): 240-253.
60. Shang RA, Chen YC, Shen L (2005) Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Inf Manag 42(3): 401-413.
61. Shim S, Eastlick MA, Lotz SL, Warrington P (2001) An online prepurchase intentions model: the role of intention to search. J Retail 77(3): 397-416.
62. Straub D, Keil M, Brenner W (1997) Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Inf Manag 33(1): 1-11.
63. Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1): 159-205.
64. Terzis V, Economides AA (2011) The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Comput Educ 56(4): 1032-1044.
65. Theokary C, Ren ZJ (2011) An empirical study of the relations between hospital volume, teaching status, and service quality. Prod Oper Manag 20(3): 303-318.
66. Tractinsky N, Katz AS, Ikar D (2000) What is beautiful is usable. Interact Comput 13(2): 127-145.
67. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2): 186-204.
68. Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart 24(1): 115-139.
69. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 27(3): 425-478.
70. Venkatesh V, Bala H, Sykes TA (2010) Impacts of information and communication technology implementations on employees' jobs in service organizations in India: a multi-method longitudinal field study. Prod Oper Manag 19(5): 591-613.
71. Vroom VH (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York.
72. Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, van Oppen C (2009) Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quart 33(1): 177-195.
73. Wixom B, Todd P (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 16(1): 85-102.
74. Wold H (1982) Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. In: Jöreskog KG, Wold H (eds) Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, prediction, vol 2. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1-54.
75. Zhang X, Prybutok VR, Koh CE (2006) The role of impulsivness in a TAM-based online purchasing behavior model. Inf Resour Manag J 19(2): 54-68.