Transcription factors: Specific DNA binding and specific gene regulation

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 211-219

  Todeschini, Anne Laure ^a,b   Georges, Adrien ^a,b   Veitia, Reiner A ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT JACQUES MONOD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

ChIP seq; Cis regulation; Gene expression; Response element; Transcription; Transcription factor

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; CHROMATIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; CHROMATIN; DNA BINDING; GENE CONTROL; HUMAN; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ANIMAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; REGULATORY SEQUENCE;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84901409283     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Levine M. Transcriptional enhancers in animal development and evolution. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R754-R763.
2. Wunderlich Z., Mirny L.A. Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:434-440.
3. Tuerk C., Gold L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 1990, 249:505-510.
4. Jolma A., et al. Multiplexed massively parallel SELEX for characterization of human transcription factor binding specificities. Genome Res. 2010, 20:861-873.
5. Furey T.S. ChIP-seq and beyond: new and improved methodologies to detect and characterize protein-DNA interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:840-852.
6. Brent M.M., et al. Structural basis for DNA recognition by FoxO1 and its regulation by posttranslational modification. Structure 2008, 16:1407-1416.
7. Klug A. The discovery of zinc fingers and their development for practical applications in gene regulation and genome manipulation. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2010, 43:1-21.
8. Lin S., Riggs A.D. The general affinity of lac repressor for E. coli DNA: implications for gene regulation in procaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell 1975, 4:107-111.
9. Kao-Huang Y., et al. Nonspecific DNA binding of genome-regulating proteins as a biological control mechanism: measurement of DNA-bound Escherichia coli lac repressor in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1977, 74:4228-4232.
10. Phair R.D., et al. Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:6393-6402.
11. Elf J., et al. Probing transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level in a living cell. Science 2007, 316:1191-1194.
12. Fisher W.W., et al. DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:21330-21335.
13. Biggin M.D. Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:611-626.
14. Simicevic J., et al. Absolute quantification of transcription factors during cellular differentiation using multiplexed targeted proteomics. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:570-576.
15. Badis G., et al. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science 2009, 324:1720-1723.
16. Robertson G., et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:651-657.
17. Valouev A., et al. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:829-834.
18. Li X., et al. Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e27.
19. Rabinovich A., et al. E2F in vivo binding specificity: comparison of consensus versus nonconsensus binding sites. Genome Res. 2008, 18:1763-1777.
20. Gehring W.J., et al. Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell 1994, 78:211-223.
21. Zhao Y., Potter S.S. Functional specificity of the Hoxa13 homeobox. Development 2001, 128:3197-3207.
22. Greer J.M., et al. Maintenance of functional equivalence during paralogous Hox gene evolution. Nature 2000, 403:661-665.
23. Kaplan T., et al. Quantitative models of the mechanisms that control genome-wide patterns of transcription factor binding during early Drosophila development. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1001290.
24. MacArthur S., et al. Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions. Genome Biol. 2009, 10:R80.
25. Zaret K.S., Carroll J.S. Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:2227-2241.
26. Bossard P., Zaret K.S. GATA transcription factors as potentiators of gut endoderm differentiation. Development 1998, 125:4909-4917.
27. Gualdi R., et al. Hepatic specification of the gut endoderm in vitro: cell signaling and transcriptional control. Genes Dev. 1996, 10:1670-1682.
28. McPherson C.E., et al. An active tissue-specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array. Cell 1993, 75:387-398.
29. Cirillo L.A., et al. Binding of the winged-helix transcription factor HNF3 to a linker histone site on the nucleosome. EMBO J. 1998, 17:244-254.
30. Clark K.L., et al. Co-crystal structure of the HNF-3/fork head DNA-recognition motif resembles histone H5. Nature 1993, 364:412-420.
31. Lee C.S., et al. The initiation of liver development is dependent on Foxa transcription factors. Nature 2005, 435:944-947.
32. Li Z., et al. Foxa1 and Foxa2 regulate bile duct development in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2009, 119:1537-1545.
33. Magnani L., et al. Pioneer factors: directing transcriptional regulators within the chromatin environment. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:465-474.
34. Charoensawan V., et al. Genomic repertoires of DNA-binding transcription factors across the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:7364-7377.
35. Lammens T., et al. Atypical E2Fs: new players in the E2F transcription factor family. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:111-118.
36. Amoutzias G.D., et al. Choose your partners: dimerization in eukaryotic transcription factors. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33:220-229.
37. Georges A.B., et al. Generic binding sites, generic DNA-binding domains: where does specific promoter recognition come from?. FASEB J. 2010, 24:346-356.
38. Gronemeyer H. Transcription activation by estrogen and progesterone receptors. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1991, 25:89-123.
39. Yu V.C., et al. RXRβ: a coregulator that enhances binding of retinoic acid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D receptors to their cognate response elements. Cell 1991, 67:1251-1266.
40. Umesono K., et al. Direct repeats as selective response elements for the thyroid hormone, retinoic acid, and vitamin D3 receptors. Cell 1991, 65:1255-1266.
41. Liu Y., et al. The genome landscape of ERα- and ERβ-binding DNA regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:2604-2609.
42. Charn T.H., et al. Genome-wide dynamics of chromatin binding of estrogen receptors α and β: mutual restriction and competitive site selection. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24:47-59.
43. Joseph R., et al. Integrative model of genomic factors for determining binding site selection by estrogen receptor-α. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:456.
44. Cook D.L., et al. Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:15641-15646.
45. Crauk O., Dostatni N. Bicoid determines sharp and precise target gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:1888-1898.
46. Lebrecht D., et al. Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:13176-13181.
47. Carey M. The enhanceosome and transcriptional synergy. Cell 1998, 92:5-8.
48. Veitia R.A. A sigmoidal transcriptional response: cooperativity, synergy and dosage effects. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2003, 78:149-170.
49. Brandt T., et al. Conservation of DNA-binding specificity and oligomerisation properties within the p53 family. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:628.
50. Benayoun B.A., Veitia R.A. A post-translational modification code for transcription factors: sorting through a sea of signals. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:189-197.
51. Hutchins A.P., et al. Distinct transcriptional regulatory modules underlie STAT3's cell type-independent and cell type-specific functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:2155-2170.
52. Shivaswamy S., et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e65.
53. Zawadzki K.A., et al. Chromatin-dependent transcription factor accessibility rather than nucleosome remodeling predominates during global transcriptional restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:3503-3513.
54. He H.H., et al. Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:343-347.
55. Veitia R.A., et al. Gene dosage effects: nonlinearities, genetic interactions, and dosage compensation. Trends Genet. 2013, 29:385-393.
56. Schnable J.C., et al. Dose-sensitivity, conserved non-coding sequences, and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:2.
57. Birchler J.A., Veitia R.A. Protein-protein and protein-DNA dosage balance and differential paralog transcription factor retention in polyploids. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:64.
58. Brewster R.C., et al. The transcription factor titration effect dictates level of gene expression. Cell 2014, 156:1312-1323.
59. Edelman L.B., Fraser P. Transcription factories: genetic programming in three dimensions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2012, 22:110-114.
60. Banos A., et al. Stochastic responses are not left to pure 'chance'. Cell 2013, 155:499-502.
61. Wang J., et al. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Res. 2012, 22:1798-1812.
62. Merika M., Thanos D. Enhanceosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11:205-208.
63. Yie J., et al. The role of HMG I(Y) in the assembly and function of the IFN-β enhanceosome. EMBO J. 1999, 18:3074-3089.
64. Adams C.C., Workman J.L. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15:1405-1421.
65. Steger D.J., Workman J.L. Stable co-occupancy of transcription factors and histones at the HIV-1 enhancer. EMBO J. 1997, 16:2463-2472.
66. Pires-daSilva A., Sommer R.J. The evolution of signalling pathways in animal development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:39-49.
67. Vinod P.K., et al. Integration of global signaling pathways, cAMP-PKA, MAPK and TOR in the regulation of FLO11. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1663.