The evolution of signalling pathways in animal development

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 39-49

  Pires daSilva, André ^a   Sommer, Ralf J ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 4; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN RECEPTOR; INOSITOL 1,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE; JANUS KINASE; NOTCH RECEPTOR; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; SMAD PROTEIN; SMAD7 PROTEIN; STAT PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; WNT PROTEIN;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL INTERACTION; CELL TYPE; COMPUTER MODEL; CYTOSKELETON; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONAL TISSUE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HYPOTHESIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; TURTLE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; SEX DETERMINATION (GENETICS); SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ERINACEIDAE; JANUS; MELANOGASTER; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TESTUDINES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0037223971     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg977     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Gilbert, S. F. & Bolker, J. A. Homologies of Process and Modular Elements of Embryonic Construction (ed Wagner, G. P.) 435-454 (Academic, San Diego, California, 2001).
2. Spemann, H. & Mangold, H. Über induktion von embryonalanlagen durch implantation artfremder organisatoren. W. Roux. Arch. Entw. Organ. 100, 599-638 (1924) (in German).
3. Ingham, P. W. & McMahon, A. P. Hedgehog signalling in animal development: Paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15, 3059-3087 (2001).
4. Cadigan, K. M. & Nusse, R. Writ signalling: A common theme in animal development. Genes Dev. 11, 3286-3305 (1997).
5. Moon, R. T., Bowerman, B., Boutros, M. & Perrimon, N. The promise and perils of Writ signalling through β-catenin. Science 296, 1644-1646 (2002).
6. Massague, J. & Chen, Y. G. Controlling TGF-β signalling. Genes Dev. 14, 627-644 (2000).
7. Mumm, J. S. & Kopan, R. Notch signalling: From the outside in. Dev. Biol. 228, 151-165 (2000).
8. Castelli-Gair Hombria, J. & Brown, S. The fertile field of Drosophila JAK/STAT signalling. Curr. Biol. 12, R569 (2002).
9. McKenna, N. J. & O'Malley, B. W. Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators. Cell 108, 465-474 (2002).
10. Gerhart, J. 1998 Warkany lecture: Signaling pathways in development. Teratology 60, 226-239 (1999).
11. Tan, P. B. & Kim, S. K. Signalling specificity: The RTK/RAS/MAP kinase pathway in metazoans Trends Genet. 15, 145-149 (1999).
12. Dumont, J. E., Pecasse, F. & Maenhaut, C. Crosstalk and specificity in signalling. Are we crosstalking ourselves into general confusion? Cell Signal. 13, 457-463 (2001).
13. Clandinin, T. R., DeModena, J. A. & Sternberg, P. W. Inositol triphosphate mediates a RAS-independent response to LET-23 receptor tyrosine kinase activation in C. elegans. Cell 92, 523-533 (1998).
14. Aroian, R. V. & Sternberg, P. W. Multiple functions of let-23, a Caenorhabditis elegans receptor tyrosine kinase gene required for vulval induction. Genetics 128, 251-267 (1991).
15. Rulifson, E. J., Wu, C. H. & Nusse, R. Pathway specificity by the bifunctional receptor Frizzled is determined by affinity for Wingless. Mol. Cell 6, 117-126 (2000).
16. Halfon, M. S. et al. Ras pathway specificity is determined by the integration of multiple signal-activated and tissue-restricted transcription factors. Cell 103, 63-74 (2000).
17. Tan, P. B., Lackner, M. R. & Kim, S. K. MAP kinase signaling specificity mediated by the LIN-1 Ets/LIN-31 WH transcription factor complex during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction. Cell 93, 569-580 (1998).
18. De Robertis, E.M., Larrain, J., Oelgeschlager, M. & Wessely, O. The establishment of Spemann's organizer and patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Nature Rev. Genet. 1, 171-181 (2000).
19. Cohen, P. & Frame, S. The renaissance of GSK3. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 769-776 (2001).
20. Dajani, R. et al. Crystal structure of glycogen synthase kinase 3β structural basis for phosphate-primed substrate specificity and autoinhibition. Cell 105, 721-732 (2001).
21. Frame, S., Cohen, P. & Biondi, R. M. A common phosphate binding site explains the unique substrate specificity of GSK3 and its inactivation by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 7, 1321-1327 (2001).
22. von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M. & Odell, G. M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188-192 (2000).
23. Meir, E., von Dassow, G., Munro, E. & Odell, G. M. Robustness, flexibility, and the role of lateral inhibition in the neurogenic network. Curr. Biol. 12, 778-786 (2002).
24. Freeman, M. Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development. Nature 408, 313-319 (2000).
25. Meinhardt, H. & Gierer, A. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. Bioessays 22, 753-760 (2000).
26. Bienz, M. & Tremml, G. Domain of Ultrabithorax expression in Drosophila visceral mesoderm from autoregulation and exclusion. Nature 333, 576-578 (1988).
27. Thuringer, F. & Bienz, M. Indirect autoregulation of a homeotic Drosophila gene mediated by extracellular signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3899-3903 (1993).
28. Chen, Y. & Struhl, G. Dual roles for Patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87, 553-563 (1996).
29. Becskei, A. & Serrano, L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature 405, 590-593 (2000).
30. Gardner, M. J. et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419, 498-511 (2002).
31. Holt, R. A. et al. The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 298, 129-149 (2002).
32. Schulte-Merker, S., Lee, K. J., McMahon, A. P. & Hammerschmidt, M. The zebrafish organizer requires chordino. Nature 387, 862-863 (1997)
33. Fisher, S. & Halpern, M. E. Patterning the zebrafish axial skeleton requires early chordin function. Nature Genet. 23, 442-446 (1999).
34. Prince, V. E. & Pickett, F. B. Splitting pairs: The diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 827-837 (2002).
35. Steele, R. E. Developmental signaling in Hydra: What does it take to build a "simple" animal? Dev. Biol. 248, 199-219 (2002).
36. McCarty, D. R. & Chory, J. Conservation and innovation in plant signaling pathways. Cell 3, 201-209 (2000).
37. Carlton, J. M. et al. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the model rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii. Nature 419, 512-519 (2002).
38. Lang, B. F., O'Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M. W. & Burger, G. The closest unicellular relatives of animals. Curr. Biol. 12, 1773-1778 (2002). A molecular phylogenetic study that confirms the earlier morphological proposal (see reference 39) that metazoans evolved from a choanoflagellate-like ancestor.
39. Clark, J. On the spongiae ciliatae as infusoria flagellata; or observations on the structure, animality and relationship of Leucosolenia botryoides, Bowerbank. Annu. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1, 133-142 (1868).
40. King, N. & Carroll, S. B. A receptor tyrosine kinase from choanoflagellates: Molecular insights into early animal evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 15032-15037 (2001).
41. Miyata, T. & Suga, H. Divergence pattern of animal gene families and relationship with the Cambrian explosion. Bioessays 23, 1018-1027 (2001).
42. Aguinaldo, A. M. et al. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489-493 (1997).
43. The International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (2001).
44. Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304-1351 (2001).
45. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: A platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012-2018 (1998).
46. Rubin, G. M. et al. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287, 2204-2215 (2000).
47. Rubin, G. & Hobert, O. The taxonomy of developmental control in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 282, 2033-2041 (1998).
48. Korswagen, H. C. et al. The axin-like protein PRY-1 is a negative regulator of a canonical Wnt pathway in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 16, 1291-1302 (2002). The authors show that, despite low sequence similarity, Caenorhabditis elegans PRY-1 can rescue a zebrafish axin mutant. This has implications for genomic studies, in which sequencing annotation must be complemented with functional studies.
49. Raff, R. A. The Shape of Life: Genes, Development and the Evolution of Animal Form (Chicago Univ. Press, Illinois, 1996).
50. Beldade, P. & Brakefield, P. M. The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 442-452 (2002).
51. Keys, D. N. et al. Recruitment of a Hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283, 532-534 (1999).
52. Hepker, J., Wang, Q. T., Motzny, C. K., Holmgren, R. & Orenic, T. V. Drosophila cubitus interruptus forms a negative feedback loop with patched and regulates expression of Hedgehog target genes. Development 124, 549-558 (1997).
53. Loredo, G. A. et al. Develcpment of an evolutionarily novel structure: fibroblast growth factor expression in the carapacial ridge of turtle embryos. J. Exp. Zool. 291, 274-281 (2001). Together with reference 51, this study indicates that the recruitment of a signalling pathway into an ectopic position is involved in the origin of a morphological novelty.
54. Sekine, K. et al. Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nature Genet. 21, 138-141 (1999).
55. Wilkins, A. S. The Evolution of Developmental Pathways (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2002).
56. Davidson, E. H. Genomic Regulatory Systems (Academic, San Diego, California, 2001).
57. Tautz, D. Evolution of transcriptional regulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 575-579 (2000).
58. Niehrs, C. & Pollet, N. Synexpression groups in eukaryotes. Nature 402, 483-487 (1999). An insightful review that proposes a mechanism for the rapid recruitment of entire signalling pathways to new tissues.
59. Gawantka, V. et al. Gene expression screening in Xenopus identifies molecular pathways, predicts gene function and provides a global view of embryonic patterning. Mech Dev. 77, 95-141 (1998).
60. Bhushan, A., Chen, Y. & Vale, W. Smad7 inhibits mesoderm formation and promotes neural cell fate in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 200, 260-268 (1998).
61. Frisch, A. & Wright, C. V. XBMPRII, a novel Xenopus type II receptor mediating BMP signaling in embryonic tissues. Development 125, 431-442 (1998).
62. Hata, A., Lagna, G., Massague, J. & Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. Smad6 inhibits BMP/Smad1 signaling by specifically competing with the Smad4 tumor suppressor. Genes Dev. 12, 186-197 (1998).
63. Arnone, M. I. & Davidson, E. H. The hardwiring of development: Organization and function of genomic regulatory systems. Development 124, 1851-1864 (1997).
64. Bull, J. J. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, 1983).
65. Marin, I. & Baker, B. S. The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science 281, 1990-1994 (1998).
66. Zarkower, D. & Hodgkin, J. Molecular analysis of the C. elegans sex-determining gene tra-1: A gene encoding two zinc finger proteins. Cell 70, 237-249 (1992).
67. Conradt, B. & Horvitz, H. R. The TRA-1A sex determination protein of C. elegans regulates sexually dimorphic cell deaths by repressing the egl-1 cell death activator gene. Cell 98, 317-327 (1999).
68. Yi, W., Ross, J. M. & Zarkower, D. mab-3 is a direct tra-1 target gene regulating diverse aspects of C. elegans male sexual development and behavior. Development 127, 4469-4480 (2000).
69. Perry, M. D. et al. Molecular characterization of the her-1 gene suggests a direct role in cell signaling during Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination. Genes Dev. 7, 216-228 (1993).
70. Kuwabara, P. E., Okkema, P. G. & Kimble, J. tra-2 encodes a membrane protein and may mediate cell communication in the Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 461-473 (1992).
71. Sokol, S. B. & Kuwabara, P. E. Proteolysis in Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination: Cleavage of TRA-2A by TRA-3. Genes Dev. 14, 901-906 (2000).
72. de Bono, M., Zarkower, D. & Hodgkin, J. Dominant feminizing mutations implicate protein-protein interactions as the main mode of regulation of the nematode sex-determining gene tra-1. Genes Dev. 9, 155-167 (1995).
73. de Bono, M. & Hodgkin, J. Evolution of sex determination in Caenorhabditis: Unusually high divergence of tra-1 and its functional consequences. Genetics 144, 587-595 (1996).
74. Haag, E. S. & Kimble, J. Regulatory elements required for development of Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites are conserved in the tra-2 homologue of C. Remanei, a male/female sisterspecies. Genetics 155, 105-116 (2000).
75. Hansen, D. & Pilgrim, D. Molecular evolution of a sex determination protein. FEM-2 (pp2c)in Caenorhabditis. Genetics 149, 1353-1362 (1998).
76. Chen, P. J., Cho, S., Jin, S. W. & Ellis, R. E. Specification of germ cell fates by fog-3 has been conserved during nematode evolution. Genetics 158, 1513-1525 (2001).
77. Stothard, P., Hansen, D. & Pilgrim, D. Evolution of the PP2C family in Caenorhabditis: Rapid divergence of the sex-determining protein FEM-2. J Mol. Evol. 54, 267-282 (2002).
78. Haag, E. S., Wang, S. & Kimble, J. Rapid coevolution of the nematode sex-determining genes fem-3 and tra-2. Curr. Biol. 12, 2035-2041 (2002). Despite the functional conservation of FEM-3 and TRA-2 in Caenorhabditis sex determination, the domain of interaction between these two proteins is evolving rapidly at the sequence level. This study shows that TRA-2 and FEM-3 can interact in three species of nematodes, but that this interaction is species specific.
79. Raymond, C. S. et al. Evidence for evolutionary conservation of sex-determining genes. Nature 391, 691-695 (1998).
80. Shen, M. M. & Hodkin, J. mab-3, a gene required for sex-specific yolk protein expression and a male-specific lineage in C. elegans. Cell 54, 1019-1031 (1988).
81. Erdman, S. E. & Burtis, K. C. The Drosophila Doublesex proteins share a novel zinc finger related DNA binding domain. EMBO J. 12, 527-535 (1993).
82. Coschigano, K. T. & Wensink, P. C. Sex-specific transcriptional regulation by the male and female Doublesex proteins of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 7, 42-54 (1993).
83. An, W. & Wensink, P. C. Integrating sex- and tissue-specific regulation within a single Drosophila enhancer. Genes Dev. 9, 256-266 (1995).
84. Raymond, C. S., Kettlewell, J. R., Hirsch, B., Bardwell, V. J. & Zarkower, D. Expression of Dmrt1 in the genital ridge of mouse and chicken embryos suggests a role in vertebrate sexual development. Dev. Biol. 215, 208-220 (1999). A landmark paper describing a gene that is in common in the sex determination pathway of distantly related phyla.
85. Matsuda, M. et al. DMY is a Y-specific DM-domain gene required for male development in the medaka fish. Nature 417, 559-563 (2002).
86. Guan, G., Kobayashi, T. & Nagahama, Y. Sexually dimorphic expression of two types of DM (Doublesex/Mab-3)-domain genes in a teleost fish, the tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 272, 662-666 (2000).
87. Kettlewell, J. R., Raymond, C. S. & Zarkower, D. Temperature-dependent expression of turtle Dmrt1 prior to sexual differentiation. Genesis 26, 174-178 (2000).
88. De Grandi, A. et al. The expression pattern of a mouse doublesex-related gene is consistent with a role in gonadal differentiation. Mech. Dev. 90, 323-326 (2000).
89. Wilkins, A. S. Moving up the hierarchy: A hypothesis on the evolution of a genetic sex determination pathway. Bioessays 17, 71-77 (1995). The author proposes a mechanism for the evolution of a regulatory cascade of inhibitory interactions from bottom to top.
90. Wang, S. Kimble, J. The TRA-1 transcription factor binds TRA-2 to regulate sexual fates in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 20,1363-1372 (2001).
91. Barolo, S. & Posakony, J. W. Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: Principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev. 16, 1167-1181 (2002).
92. Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151-1155 (2000).
93. Lynch, M. & Force, A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154, 459-473 (2000).
94. Nadeau, J. H. & Sankoff, D. Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution. Genetics 147, 1259-1266 (1997).
95. Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531-1545 (1999). In this paper, the authors present an interesting mechanism for the retention of duplicated genes.
96. Fryxell, K. J. The coevolution of gene family trees. Trends Genet. 12, 364-369 (1996).
97. Goodwin, E. B. & Ellis, R. E. Turning clustering loops: Sex determination in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 12, 111-120 (2002).
98. Zarkower, D. Establishing sexual dimorphism: Conservation amidst diversity? Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 175-185 (2001).