Surface- and deep-level diversity in panel selection - Exploring diversity effects on response behaviour in foresight

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 85, Issue , 2014, Pages 105-120

  Spickermann, Alexander ^a   Zimmermann, Martin ^b   von der Gracht, Heiko A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b EBS BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Extreme response style (ERS); Multimodal mobility; Panel diversity; Policy Delphi; Sampling

Indexed keywords

SAMPLING; SURVEYS;

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; EXTREME RESPONSE; INTERACTION PHENOMENA; MULTI-MODAL; PANEL DIVERSITY; PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS; RESPONSE BEHAVIOUR; SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH;

RESEARCH;

DELPHI ANALYSIS; PLANNING METHOD; POLICY APPROACH; REAL TIME; RESEARCH WORK; SAMPLING;

EID: 84900547020     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (158)

1. van der Duin P., van Oirschot R., Kotey H., Vreeling E. To govern is to foresee: an exploratory study into the relationship between futures research and strategy and policy processes at Dutch ministries. Futures 2009, 41:607-618.
2. van der Duin P., den Hartigh E. Keeping the balance: exploring the link of futures research with innovation and strategy processes. Tech. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2009, 21:333-351.
3. Ronde P. Technological clusters with a knowledge-based principle: evidence from a Delphi investigation in the French case of the life sciences. Res. Policy 2001, 30:1041-1057.
4. Landeta J., Barrutia J., Lertxundi A. Hybrid Delphi: a methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1629-1641.
5. Blind K., Cuhls K., Grupp H. Current foresight activities in central Europe. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1999, 60:15-35.
6. Linstone H.A., Turoff M. Delphi: a brief look backward and forward. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1712-1719.
7. Munier F., Rondé P. The role of knowledge codification in the emergence of consensus under uncertainty: empirical analysis and policy implications. Res. Policy 2001, 30:1537-1551.
8. Van Zolingen S.J., Klaassen C.A. Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in Senior Secondary Vocational Education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70:317-340.
9. Webler T., Levine D., Rakel H., Renn O. A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: the group Delphi. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1991, 39:253-263.
10. Landeta J., Barrutia J. People consultation to construct the future: a Delphi application. Int. J. Forecast. 2011, 27:134-151.
11. Parente R., Anderson-Parente J. A case study of long-term Delphi accuracy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1705-1711.
12. Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73:467-482.
13. Rowe G., Wright G. The Delphi technique: past, present, and future prospects - introduction to the special issue. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1487-1490.
14. Gordon T., Pease A. RT Delphi: an efficient, "round-less" almost real time Delphi method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73:321-333.
15. Rowe G., Wright G. Expert opinions in forecasting: the role of the Delphi technique. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 2001, 125-144. Kluwer Academic, Boston; Dordrecht and London. J.S. Armstrong (Ed.).
16. Rauch W. The decision Delphi. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1979, 15:159-169.
17. de Jong M.G., Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Fox J.-P., Baumgartner H. Using item response theory to measure extreme response style in marketing research: a global investigation. J. Mark. Res. 2008, 45:104-115.
18. Hussler C., Muller P., Rondé P. Is diversity in Delphi panelist groups useful? Evidence from a French forecasting exercise on the future of nuclear energy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1642-1653.
19. Klenk N.L., Hickey G.M. A virtual and anonymous, deliberative and analytic participation process for planning and evaluation: the concept mapping policy Delphi. Int. J. Forecast. 2011, 27:152-165.
20. Schneider J.B. The policy Delphi: a regional planning application. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1972, 3:481-497.
21. Williams K.Y., O'Reilly C.A. Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 1998, 20:77-140.
22. Hasson F., Keeney S. Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1695-1704.
23. Shore L.M., Chung-Herrera B.G., Dean M.A., Ehrhart K.H., Jung D.I., Randel A.E., Singh G. Diversity in organizations: where are we now and where are we going?. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2009, 19:117-133.
24. Gnatzy T., Warth J., von der Gracht H., Darkow I.-L. Validating an innovative real-time Delphi approach - a methodological comparison between real-time and conventional Delphi studies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1681-1694.
25. von der Gracht H.A. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79:1525-1536.
26. von der Gracht H.A. Future of Logistics 2008, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
27. Turoff M. The design of a policy Delphi. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1970, 2:149-171.
28. Steinert M. A dissensus based online Delphi approach: an explorative research tool. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76:291-300.
29. van de Linde E., van der Duin P. The Delphi method as early warning: linking global societal trends to future radicalization and terrorism in The Netherlands. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1557-1564.
30. Tapio P. Disaggregative policy Delphi: using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70:83-101.
31. Dalkey N.C. Delphi 1967, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
32. Armstrong J.S. Principles of Forecasting: a Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston et al.
33. Cook V., Frigstad D. Take it to the top: Delphi sampling is the best for supply chain research. Mark. Res. 1997, 9:23-29.
34. Judd R.C. Use of Delphi methods in higher education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1972, 4:173-186.
35. Greatorex J., Dexter T. An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000, 32:1016-1024.
36. Rowe G., Wright G., Bolger F. Delphi: a reevaluation of research and theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1991, 39:235-251.
37. Sackman H. Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting, and Group Process 1974, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
38. Hill K.Q., Fowles J. The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1975, 7:179-192.
39. Harrison D.A., Klein K.J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32:1199-1228.
40. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44:741-763.
41. Pelled L.H., Eisenhardt K.M., Xin K.R. Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44:1-28.
42. Bowers C.A., Pharmer J.A., Salas E. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. Small Group Res. 2000, 31:305-327.
43. van Knippenberg D., Schippers M.C. Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:515-541.
44. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Bell M.P. Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Manag. J. 1998, 41:96-107.
45. Jackson S.E., Brett J.F., Sessa V.I., Cooper D.M., Julin J.A., Peyronnin K. Some differences make a difference: individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. J. Appl. Psychol. 1991, 76:675-689.
46. Dunn W.N. Public Policy Analysis: an Introduction 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 3rd ed.
47. More S.J., McKenzie K., O'Flaherty J., Doherty M.L., Cromie A.R., Magan M.J. Setting priorities for non-regulatory animal health in Ireland: results from an expert policy Delphi study and a farmer priority identification survey. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 95:198-207.
48. Setty K., Padmanabhan S., Natarajan R. A national energy-conservation policy Delphi: report of the findings. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1987, 31:257-267.
49. Frewer L.J., Fischer A.R.H., Wentholt M.T.A., Marvin H.J.P., Ooms B.W., Coles D., Rowe G. The use of Delphi methodology in agrifood policy development: some lessons learned. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1514-1525.
50. de Loe R.C. Exploring complex policy questions using the policy Delphi: a multi-round, interactive survey method. Appl. Geogr. 1995, 15:53-68.
51. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Gavin J.H., Florey A.T. Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45:1029-1045.
52. Turban D.B., Jones A.P. Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, and mechanisms. J. Appl. Psychol. 1988, 73:228.
53. Bantel K.A., Jackson S.E. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strateg. Manag. J. 1989, 10:107-124.
54. Wagner W.G., Pfeffer J., O'Reilly C.A. Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Adm. Sci. Q. 1984, 29:74-92.
55. Wiersema M.F., Bird A. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 1993, 36:996-1025.
56. Tsui A.S., O'Reilly C.A. Beyond simple demographic effects: the importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad. Manag. J. 1989, 32:402-423.
57. Tsui A.S., Ashford S.J., St.Clair L., Xin K.R. Dealing with discrepant expectations: response strategies and managerial effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 1995, 38:1515-1543.
58. Mobley W.H. Supervisor and employee race and sex effects on performance appraisals: a field study of adverse impact and generalizability. Acad. Manag. J. 1982, 25:598-606.
59. Katsikea E., Theodosiou M., Perdikis N., Kehagias J. The effects of organizational structure and job characteristics on export sales managers' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. J. World Bus. 2011, 46:221-233.
60. Hu X., Kaplan S., Dalal R.S. An examination of blue-versus white-collar workers' conceptualizations of job satisfaction facets. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010, 76:317-325.
61. Mahoney T.A., Frost P., Crandall N.F., Weitzel W. The conditioning influence of organization size upon managerial practice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1972, 8:230-241.
62. Jordan J.M., Meador M., Walters S.J.K. Effects of department size and organization on the research productivity of academic economists. Econ. Educ. Rev. 1988, 7:251-255.
63. Vaccaro I.G., Jansen J.J., Van Den Bosch F.A., Volberda H.W. Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size. J. Manag. Stud. 2012, 49:28-51.
64. Berson Y., Shamir B., Avolio B.J., Popper M. The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context. Leadersh. Q. 2001, 12:53-73.
65. Camisón-Zornoza C., Lapiedra-Alcamí R., Segarra-Ciprés M., Boronat-Navarro M. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organ. Stud. 2004, 25:331-361.
66. Miles R.E. Attitudes toward management theory as a factor in managers' relationships with their superiors. Acad. Manag. J. 1964, 7:308-314.
67. Senger J. Managers' perceptions of subordinates' competence as a function of personal value orientations. Acad. Manag. J. 1971, 14:415-423.
68. Zalesny M.D., Kirsch M.P. The effect of similarity on performance ratings and interrater agreement. Hum. Relat. 1989, 42:81-96.
69. Fox S., Ben-Nahum Z., Yinon Y. Perceived similarity and accuracy of peer ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 1989, 74:781.
70. Terborg J.R., Castore C., DeNinno J.A. A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition on group performance and cohesion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1976, 34:782-790.
71. Jehn K.A., Mannix E.A. The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Manag. J. 2001, 44:238-251.
72. Antill J.K. Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 45:145-155.
73. Mcgrath J.E., Arrow H., Gruenfeld D.H., Hollingshead A.B., O'Connor K.M. Groups, tasks, and technology. Small Group Res. 1993, 24:406-420.
74. Newcomb T.M. The Acquaintance Process 1961, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
75. Thibaut J.W., Kelley H.H. The Social Psychology of Groups 1959, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
76. Grabner R.H., Neubauer A.C., Stern E. Superior performance and neural efficiency: the impact of intelligence and expertise. Brain Res. Bull. 2006, 69:422-439.
77. Hershey D.A., Walsh D.A., Read S.J., Chulef A.S. The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1990, 46:77-101.
78. Mat A., Razak R.C. The influence of organizational learning capability on success of technological innovation (product) implementation with moderating effect of knowledge complexity. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2011, 2:217-225.
79. Yeung A.C.L., Lai K., Yee R.W.Y. Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizational performance: a qualitative investigation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45:2459-2477.
80. Yamazaki Y., Kayes D.C. Learning and work satisfaction in Asia: a comparative study of Japanese, Chinese and Malaysian managers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2010, 21:2271-2289.
81. Chiva R., Alegre J. Organizational learning capability and job satisfaction: an empirical assessment in the ceramic tile industry. Br. J. Manag. 2009, 20:323-340.
82. Rose R.C., Kurnar N., Ong Gua P. The effect of organizational learning on organizational commitment, job satisfaction and work performance. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 2009, 25:55-65.
83. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S. Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task. Int. J. Forecast. 2011, 27:183-195.
84. Naemi B.D., Beal D.J., Payne S.C. Personality predictors of extreme response style. J. Personal. 2009, 77:261-286.
85. Kruglanski A.W. Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases 1989, Plenum Press.
86. Thompson M.M., Naccarato M.E., Parker K. Assessing cognitive need: the development of the personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity scales. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 1989.
87. Spence M.T., Brucks M. The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts' and novices' judgments. J. Mark. Res. 1997, 34:233-247.
88. Shanteau J. Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psychol. 1988, 68:203-215.
89. Rowe G., Wright G. The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques. Int. J. Forecast. 1996, 12:73-89.
90. Rowe G., Wright G., McColl A. Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: the role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2005, 72:377-399.
91. Jehn K.A. Enhancing effectiveness: an investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 1994, 5:223-238.
92. Stasser G. Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a "thought experiment". Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1992, 52:156-181.
93. Ronde P. Delphi analysis of national specificities in selected innovative areas in Germany and France. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70:419-448.
94. Cuhls K. Opening up foresight processes. Econ. Soc. 2000, 34:21-40.
95. Chattopadhyay P. Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: the influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 1999, 42:273-287.
96. Lee J.H., Hwang J. Luxury marketing: the influences of psychological and demographic characteristics on attitudes toward luxury restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30:658-669.
97. Wang L., Lu W., Malhotra N.K. Demographics, attitude, personality and credit card features correlate with credit card debt: a view from China. J. Econ. Psychol. 2011, 32:179-193.
98. Chen X., Peterson M.N., Hull V., Lu C., Lee G.D., Hong D., Liu J. Effects of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on pro-environmental behaviour in urban China. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38:45-52.
99. McMillan M., Hoban T.J., Clifford W.B., Brant M.R. Social and demographic influences on environmental attitudes. South. Rural. Sociol. 1997, 13:89-107.
100. Ziegler A. Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2012, 46:1372-1385.
101. Shen J., Saijo T. Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: evidence from Shanghai data. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28:42-50.
102. Gordon M.E., Johnson W.A. Seniority: a review of its legal and scientific standing. Pers. Psychol. 1982, 35:255-280.
103. Quińones M.A., Ford J.K., Teachout M.S. The relationship between work experience and job performance: a conceptual and meta-analytic review. Pers. Psychol. 1995, 48:887-910.
104. Gould S., Hawkins B.L. Organizational career stage as a moderator of the satisfaction-performance relationship. Acad. Manag. J. 1978, 21:434-450.
105. Choudhury A., Jones J. Effect of job level on the performance of human capital attainment: an exploratory analysis. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2010, 9.
106. Temtime Z.T. The moderating impacts of business planning and firm size on total quality management practices. TQM Mag. 2003, 15:52-60.
107. Baldridge J.V., Burnham R.A. Organizational innovation: individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Adm. Sci. Q. 1975, 165-176.
108. Blau J.R., McKinley W. Ideas, complexity, and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 200-219.
109. Geels F.W., Schot J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 2007, 36:399-417.
110. Lerner W. The Future of Urban Mobility - Towards Networked, Multimodal Cities of 2050 2011, Arthur D. Little.
111. Harris A., Tapsas D. Transport and Mobility: Challenges, Innovations and Improvements 2006, Roayal Automobile Club of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
112. Schrank D., Lomax T., Turner S. TTI's 2010 Urban Mobility Report 2010, Texas Transportation Institute, A&M University, College Station, TX.
113. Kuhnimhof T., Buehler R., Wirtz M., Kalinowska D. Travel trends among young adults in Germany: increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 24:443-450.
114. Van Nes R., Bovy P.H.L. Multimodal traveling and its impact on urban transit network design. J. Adv. Transp. 2004, 38:225-241.
115. Warth J., von der Gracht H.A., Darkow I.-L. A dissent-based approach for multi-stakeholder scenario development - the future of electric drive vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:566-583.
116. van Nes R. Design of Multimodal Transport Networks, a Hierarchical Approach, t2002/5 2002, (TRAIL Thesis Series), Delft University Press, The Netherlands.
117. Loose W., Mohr M., Nobis C. Assessment of the future development of car sharing in Germany and related opportunities. Transp. Rev. 2006, 26:365-382.
118. Oltra V., Saint Jean M. Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the French automotive industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76:567-583.
119. European Commisson Study on Urban Access Restrictions 2010, (Rome).
120. Bernhart W., Grosse Kleimann P., Hoffmann M. Automotive Landscape 2025: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead 2011, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, Munich.
121. Leurent F., Windisch E. Triggering the development of electric mobility: a review of public policies. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2011, 3:1-15.
122. Musso A., Corazza M.V., Tozzi M. Car sharing in Rome: a case study to support sustainable mobility. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 48:3482-3491.
123. Economides S., Han C., Orowitsch S., Scoullos I., Nuttall W. Paradigm shift for future mobility: a cross country analysis of behavioural policies. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 48:2588-2596.
124. Geist M.R. Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: a comparison of two studies. Eval. Program. Plann. 2010, 33:147-154.
125. Loveridge D. On Delphi questions. Ideas in Progress 2002, The University of Manchester, Manchester.
126. von der Gracht H.A., Darkow I.L. Scenarios for the logistics services industry: a Delphi-based analysis for 2025. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010, 127:46-59.
127. Bañuls V.A., Turoff M. Scenario construction via Delphi and cross-impact analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1579-1602.
128. Gordon T.J., Hayward H. Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. Futures 1968, 1:100-116.
129. Parentè F.J., Anderson-Parentè J.K. Delphi inquiry systems. Judgemental Forecasting 1987, 129-156. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. G. Wright, P. Ayton (Eds.).
130. Bradburn N.M., Sudman S., Wansink B. Asking Questions: the Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design-for Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires 2004, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Revised edition.
131. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
132. Welty G. Problems of selecting experts for Delphi exercises. Acad. Manag. J. 1972, 15:121-124.
133. De Rada V.D. Measure and control of non-response in a mail survey. Eur. J. Mark. 2005, 39:16-32.
134. Armstrong J.S., Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 1977, 14:396-402.
135. DeVellis R.F. Scale Development: Theory and Applications 2011, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
136. Bergkvist L., Rossiter J.R. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J. Mark. Res. 2007, 44:175-184.
137. Goodwin P., Wright G. The limits of forecasting methods in anticipating rare events. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77:355-368.
138. Spector P.E. Summated Rating Scale Construction: an Introduction 1992, Sage Publications, Incorporated, Newbury Park, California.
139. Harrison D.A., Sin H. What is diversity and how should it be measured. Handbook of Workplace Diversity 2006, 191-216.
140. Teachman J.D. Analysis of population diversity. Sociol. Methods Res. 1980, 8:341-362.
141. Ancona D.G., Caldwell D.F. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 1992, 3:321-341.
142. Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics 2003, The MIT press.
143. Lau D.C., Murnighan J.K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23:325-340.
144. Lau D.C., Murnighan J.K. Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Manag. J. 2005, 48:645-659.
145. Li J., Hambrick D.C. Factional groups: a new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Manag. J. 2005, 48:794-813.
146. Earley P.C., Mosakowski E. Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43:26-49.
147. Phillips K.W., Mannix E.A., Neale M.A., Gruenfeld D.H. Diverse groups and information sharing: the effects of congruent ties. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 40:497-510.
148. Sawyer J.E., Houlette M.A., Yeagley E.L. Decision performance and diversity structure: comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2006, 99:1-15.
149. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51:1173.
150. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression 2000, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
151. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis - a Global Perspective 2010, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
152. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum. 3rd ed.
153. Sharma S., Durand R.M., Gur-Arie O. Identification and analysis of moderator variables. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18:291-300.
154. Tichy G. The over-optimism among experts in assessment and foresight. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2004, 71:341-363.
155. Ward M., Gruppen L., Regehr G. Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art. Adv. Heal. Sci. Educ. 2002, 7:63-80.
156. Burgman M., Carr A., Godden L., Gregory R., McBride M., Flander L., Maguire L. Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment. Conservation Letters 2011, 4:81-87.
157. Buettner V., Hilger S., Richter A., Schaffer U., Zander K. Hanging together, together hung? The role of relationship ties in the context of CFO dismissals. Working Paper 10-06 2010, European Business School.
158. Zimmermann M., Darkow I.-L., von der Gracht H.A. Integrating Delphi and participatory backcasting in pursuit of trustworthiness - the case of electric mobility in Germany. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79:1605-1621.