First versus second stage C/S maternal and neonatal morbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 15-24

  Pergialiotis, Vasileios ^a   Vlachos, Dimitrios G ^a   Rodolakis, Alexandros ^a   Haidopoulos, Dimitrios ^a   Thomakos, Nikolaos ^a   Vlachos, Georgios D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Maternal; Morbidity; Neonatal; Second stage

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; APGAR SCORE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFANTILE SPASM; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTUBATION; LABOR STAGE 2; LAPAROTOMY; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MECONIUM ASPIRATION; META ANALYSIS; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN HYPOXIA; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NEWBORN SEPSIS; PERINATAL MORBIDITY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; VACUUM EXTRACTOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WOUND INFECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; LABOR STAGE 1; NEWBORN;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84898059575     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.033     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. J.A. Martin, B.E. Hamilton, and S.J. Ventura et al. Births: final data for 2009 Natl Vital Stat Rep 60 2011 1 70
2. A.F. Gei Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: the role of operative vaginal delivery Semin Perinatol 36 2012 365 373
3. P.E. Bailey The disappearing art of instrumental delivery: time to reverse the trend Int J Gynaecol Obstet 91 2005 89 96
4. T.Y. Leung, and T.T. Lao Timing of caesarean section according to urgency Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27 2013 251 267
5. D.F. Stroup, J.A. Berlin, and S.C. Morton et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group JAMA 283 2000 2008 2012
6. V. Ehrenstein Association of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disability Clin Epidemiol 1 2009 45 53
7. J.P. Ioannidis, and T.A. Trikalinos The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey CMAJ 176 2007 1091 1096
8. K. Garrett, A. Butler, and W.R. Cohen Cesarean delivery during second-stage labor: characteristics and diagnostic accuracy J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 17 2005 49 53
9. V.M. Allen, C.M. O'Connell, and T.F. Baskett Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour BJOG 112 2005 986 990
10. L. Cebekulu, and E.J. Buchmann Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95 2006 110 114
11. J.M. Alexander, K.J. Leveno, and D.J. Rouse et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor Obstet Gynecol 109 2007 917 921
12. D. Selo-Ojeme, S. Sathiyathasan, and M. Fayyaz Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity Arch Gynecol Obstet 278 2008 245 249
13. K.C. Winovitch, D.A. Wing, D.C. Lagrew, and J.H. Chung The risk of acute neonatal morbidities in the delivery room after primary cesarean at term: influence of labor and stage Am J Perinatol 26 2009 545 551
14. V. Govender, M. Panday, and J. Moodley Second stage caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in South Africa J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23 2010 1151 1155
15. S.L. Seal, G. Kamilya, J. Mukherji, S.K. Bhattacharyya, A. De, and A. Hazra Outcome in second- versus first-stage cesarean delivery in a teaching institution in eastern India Am J Perinatol 27 2010 507 512
16. K.A. Rabiu, A.A. Adewunmi, O.I. Akinola, A.E. Eti, and A.O. Tayo Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria Niger Postgrad Med J 18 2011 165 171
17. A. Sucak, S. Celen, E. Akbaba, S. Soysal, O. Moraloglu, and N. Danisman Comparison of nulliparas undergoing cesarean section in first and second stages of labour: a prospective study in a tertiary teaching hospital Obstet Gynecol Int 2011 2011 986506
18. A. Boyle, U.M. Reddy, H.J. Landy, C.C. Huang, R.W. Driggers, and S.K. Laughon Primary cesarean delivery in the United States Obstet Gynecol 122 2013 33 40
19. N. Jastrow, S. Demers, R.J. Gauthier, N. Chaillet, N. Brassard, and E. Bujold Adverse obstetric outcomes in women with previous cesarean for dystocia in second stage of labor Am J Perinatol 30 2013 173 178
20. S. Miot, D. Riethmuller, and K. Deleplancque et al. Cesarean section for failed vacuum extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal outcomes Gynecol Obstet Fertil 32 2004 607 612
21. C. Spencer, D. Murphy, and S. Bewley Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour BMJ 333 2006 613 614
22. R. Bahl, R.R. Patel, R. Swingler, M. Ellis, and D.J. Murphy Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years after operative delivery in the second stage of labor: a cohort study Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 2007 147.e1 147.e6
23. A.T. Bleich, J.M. Alexander, D.D. McIntire, and K.J. Leveno An analysis of second-stage labor beyond 3 hours in nulliparous women Am J Perinatol 29 2012 717 722
24. J.F. Sung, K.I. Daniels, L. Brodzinsky, Y.Y. El-Sayed, A.B. Caughey, and D.J. Lyell Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 2007 306.e1 306.e5
25. T. Bergholt, J.K. Stenderup, A. Vedsted-Jakobsen, P. Helm, and C. Lenstrup Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82 2003 251 256
26. I. Blickstein Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia J Perinat Med 32 2004 465 469
27. S. Chopra, R. Bagga, A. Keepanasseril, V. Jain, J. Kalra, and V. Suri Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88 2009 1163 1166
28. K.A. Frass, A. Al Eryani, and A.H. Al-Harazi Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing in cesarean section for obstructed labor. A comparative study in Yemen Saudi Med J 32 2011 1261 1266
29. B.J. Wylie, S. Gilbert, and M.B. Landon et al. Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 115 2010 1134 1140
30. G. Werkoff, O. Morel, and P. Desfeux et al. Kiwi vacuum extractor versus forceps and spatula: maternal and fetal morbidity evaluation in 169 fetal extractions Gynecol Obstet Fertil 38 2010 653 659
31. S. Baloch, M. Khaskheli, I.A. Khushk, and A. Sheeba Frequency of second stage intervention and its outcome in relation with instrumental vaginal delivery versus caesarean section J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 20 2008 87 90