Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: Conventional method versus reverse breech extraction

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1163-1166

  Chopra, Seema ^a   Bagga, Rashmi ^a   Keepanasseril, Anish ^a   Jain, Vanita ^a   Kalra, Jasvinder ^a   Suri, Vanita ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Deeply engaged head; Impacted head; Reverse breech extraction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH EXTRACTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; HEAD; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE BREECH EXTRACTION; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION;

APGAR SCORE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 70350628653     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340903214932     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Murphy DJ. Maternal and neonatal morbidity following operative delivery in the second stage of labor. In: Dunlop W, Bonnar J, editors. Recent advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.22. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003. p. 85-94.
2. Blickstein I. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during caesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia. J Perinat Med. 2004;/32:/465-9.
3. Kafali H. Cesarean breech extraction for impacted fetal head in deep pelvis after a prolonged obstructed labour: A cesarean technique variation. Internet J Gynaecol. 2003; 2-5.
4. Mukhopadhyay P, Naskar T, Dalui R, Hazra S, Bhattacharya D. Evaluation of Patwardhan's technic- a four year study in a rural teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2005;/55:/244-6.
5. Fong YF, Arulkumaran S. Breech extraction- an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at caesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1991;/56:/183-4.
6. Hassanien T. A new indication for breech extraction. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;/39:/509-10.
7. Landesman R. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the caesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;/148:/707-10.
8. Khosla AH, Dahiya K, Sangwan K. Caesarean section in a wedged head. Indian J Med Sci. 2003;57:187.
9. Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appleman Z, Levin D, Or Y, Hagay ZJ. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;/121:/24-6.
10. Lippert TH. Bimanual delivery of the fetal head at caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;59:234.
11. Hager RME, Dalveit AK, Hofoss D. Complications of caesarean deliveries; rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;/190:/428-34.
12. Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akindele ST, Loto OM, et al. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour- a randomized comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;/22:/375-8.