Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 917-921

  Alexander, James M ^a   Leveno, Kenneth J ^b   Rouse, Dwight J ^b   Landon, Mark B ^b   Gilbert, Sharon ^b   Spong, Catherine Y ^b   Varner, Michael W ^b   Moawad, Atef H ^b   Caritis, Steve N ^b   Harper, Margaret ^b   Wapner, Ronald J ^b   Sorokin, Yoram ^b   Miodovnik, Menachem ^b   O'Sullivan, Mary J ^b   Sibai, Baha M ^b   Langer, Oded ^b   Gabbe, Steven G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY ROOM; ENDOMETRITIS; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HIGH BIRTH WEIGHT; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UTERINE ATONY; WOUND COMPLICATION;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; BIRTH INJURIES; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; INTUBATION; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MORBIDITY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; SEIZURES;

EID: 34147188502     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:589-95.
2. Murphy DJ. Failure to progress in the second stage of labour. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001;13:557-61.
3. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 2001;358:1203-07.
4. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 2003;110:610-5.
5. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-9.
6. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth J, Landon MB, Thom E, Spong CY, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:885-90.
7. Cohen WR. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:266-9.
8. Hellman LM, Prystowsky H. The duration of the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952;63:1223-33.
9. Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C, Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:906-12.
10. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1445-54.