Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing in cesarean section for obstructed labor: A comparative study in Yemen

Saudi Medical Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1261-1266

  Frass, Kaima A ^a   Al Eryani, Abdulhakim ^a   Al Harazi, Abdelrahman H ^a  

^a THAMAR UNIVERSITY   (Yemen)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BREECH EXTRACTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETUS; HEAD PUSHING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; YEMEN; BREECH PRESENTATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; BREECH PRESENTATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YEMEN;

EID: 84860667929     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: 16583175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adhikari S, Dasgupta M, Sanghamita M. Management of obstructed labor: a retrospective study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 2005; 55: 48-51.
2. Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, Vanden BN. Establishing standards for obstructed labor in a low-income country. Rural and Remote Health 8: 1022 (on line) 2008. [Accessed 2010 November 12; Updated 2011 June 8]. Available from URL:http://www.rrh.org.au
3. van Beekhuizen HJ, Unkels R, Mmuni NS, Kaiser M. Complications of obstructed labour: pressure necrosis of neonatal scalp and vesicovaginal fistula. Lancet 2006; 368: 1210.
4. Chhabra S, Gandhi D, Jaiswal M. Obstructed labour-a preventable entity. J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 20: 151-153.
5. Weiner R, Ronsmans C, Dorman E, Jilo H, Muhoro A, Shulman C. Labour complications remain the most important risk factors for perinatal mortality in rural Kenya. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 561-566.
6. Melah GS, El-Nafaty AU, Massa AA, Audu BM. Obstructed labour: a public health problem in Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 23: 369-373.
7. Neilson JP, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S. Obstructed labour. Br Med Bull 2003; 67: 191-204.
8. Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. BJOG 2005; 112: 986-990.
9. Dafallah SE, Ambago J, El-Agib F. Obstructed labor in a teaching hospital in Sudan. Saudi Med J 2003; 24: 1102-1104.
10. Dolea C, Abouzahr C. Global burden of obstructed labour in the year 2000. Geneva: Evidence and Information for Policy, World Health Organization; 2003.
11. Chopra S, Bagga R, Keepanasseril A, Jain V, Kalra J, Suri V. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 1163-1166.
12. Blickstein I. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia. J Perinat Med 2004; 32: 465-469.
13. Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z, Levin D, Or Y, Hagay ZJ. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 121: 24-26.
14. Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akindele ST, Loto OM, et al. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22: 375-378.
15. Baloch S, Khaskheli M, Khushk IA, Sheeba A. Frequency of second stage intervention and its outcome in relation with instrumental vaginal delivery versus caesarean section. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008; 20: 87-90.
16. Kafali H. Cesarean breech extraction for impacted fetal head in deep pelvis after a prolonged obstructed labour: a cesarean technique variation. The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2003; 2: 2-5.
17. Khosla AH, Dahiya K, Sangwan K. Cesarean section in a wedged head. Indian J Med Sci 2003; 57: 187-191.
18. Ohonsi AO, Ashimi O. Obstructed labor-A six year Review in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Nigeria Med Pract 2007; 51: 59-63.
19. Bhosale A, Fonseca M, Nandanwar YS. Obstructed labor due to contracted pelvis in a grand multiparous women. Bombay Hosp J 2010; 52: 138-140.
20. Surapanthapisit P, Thitadilok W. Risk factors of caesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89 Suppl 4: S105-S111.
21. Häger RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Øian P, et al. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 428-434.
22. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 2001; 358: 1203-1207.
23. Iffy L, Apuzzio JJ. Reverse breech extraction for cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 126-127.