Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: An observational study of the incidence and risk factors

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 251-256

  Bergholt, Thomas ^a,b   Stenderup, Jens Karl ^a   Vedsted Jakobsen, Agnete ^a   Helm, Peter ^a   Lenstrup, Carsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Intraoperative complications

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DENMARK; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DYSTOCIA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PAIN; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PLACENTA PREVIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SOLUTIO PLACENTAE; SURGEON; TIME; UTERUS CONTRACTION; INJURY; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; UTERUS; VAGINA;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DENMARK; FEMALE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; UTERUS; VAGINA;

EID: 0242317740     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00095.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kerr JMM. The lower uterine segment incision in conservative caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaec Br Emp 1921; 28: 475-87.
2. Cesarean Section and Cesarean Hysterectomy. In: Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC (eds): 19th edn. East Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1993: 591-614.
3. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Publication, 1989.
4. Nielsen TF, Hökegård KH. Caesarean section and intraoperative surgical complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 103-8.
5. van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intraoperative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74: 1-6.
6. Landesman R, Graber EA. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the caesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 147: 707-10.
7. Andersen HF, Auster GH, Marx GF, Merkatz IR. Neonatal status in relation to incision intervals, obstetric factors, and anesthesia at caesarean delivery. Am J Perinatal 1987, 2002; 4: 279-83.
8. Wilkinson C, Enkin MW. Manual removal of the placenta at caesarean section (Cochrane Review). In: Update Software. Oxford: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1.
9. Wahab MA, Karantzis P, Eccersley PS, Russell IF, Thompson JW, Lindow SW. A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section. BJOG 1999; 106: 913-6.
10. Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M. Caesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 57: 273-9.
11. Andersen KV, Lange AP, Helweg-Larsen K. A perinatal audit of tillbirth in three Danish counties. Scand J Soc Med 1991; 19: 127-33.
12. Andersen KV, Lange AP, Helweg-Larsen K, Andersen E. A perinatal audit of neonatal death in three Danish counties. Scand J Soc Med 1991; 38: 382-5.
13. Oates SE. Maternal mortality and morbidity. In: Maresh M (ed.): Audit in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994: 131-9.
14. Robson MS. Labor ward audit. In: Creasy RK (ed.): Management of Labor and Delivery. Boston, USA: Blackwell Science Inc., 1997: 559-70.
15. Steer P. Caesarean section: an evolving procedure? BJOG 1998; 105: 1052-5.
16. Patterson-Brown S, Fisk N. Caesarean section; every woman's right to choose? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 351-5.
17. Cotzias CS, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion. Eur J Obstet Reprod Biol 2001; 97: 15-6.
18. Impey L, Boylan P. Active management of labour revisited. BJOG 1999; 106: 1052-5.