The risk of acute neonatal morbidities in the delivery room after primary cesarean at term: Influence of labor and stage

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 545-551

  Winovitch, Kim C ^a,c   Wing, Deborah A ^a   Lagrew, David C ^a,b   Chung, Judith H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Memorial Care   (United States)

^c Building 56 Suite 800 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Labor; Neonatal morbidity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY ROOM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAPARTUM CARE; INTUBATION; LABOR ONSET; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY ROOMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MECONIUM; PREGNANCY; RESUSCITATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349456481     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214240     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1-103
2. Gharaibeh AM, Al-Bdour AE, Akasheh HF. The mounting rate of cesarean sections: is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births? Saudi Med J 2008;29:267-270
3. Lavin JP Jr, Eaton J, Hopkins M. Teaching vaginal breech delivery and external cephalic version. A survey of faculty attitudes. J Reprod Med 2000;45:808-812
4. (Pubitemid 30800205) Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicenter trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375-1383
5. (Pubitemid 30224205) Vimercati A, Greco P, Kardashi A, et al. Choice of cesarean and perception of legal pressure. J Perinat Med 2000;28: 111-117
6. (Pubitemid 32640179) Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3-8
7. Greene MF. Vaginal birth after cesarean revisited. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2647-2649
8. (Pubitemid 46035510) Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists- knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109: 57-66
9. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110: 1209-1212
10. Declercq E, Menacker F, MacDorman M. Rise in "no indicated risk" primary cesareans in the United States 1991- 2001: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 2005;330:71-72
11. National Institutes of Health. State-of-the-science-conference statement. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1386-1397
12. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. First birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:765-769
13. (Pubitemid 38879093) Minkoff H, Powderly KR, Chervenak F, McCullough LB. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:387-392
14. Hale RW, Harer WB. Elective prophylactic cesarean delivery [editorial]. ACOG Clinical Review 2005;10:1,-15
15. Murphy DJ. Failure to progress in the second stage of labor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001;13:557-561
16. (Pubitemid 33010842) Murphy DJ, Liebling R, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 2001;358:1203-1207
17. (Pubitemid 36249999) Murphy DJ, Liebling R, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 2003;110:610- 615
18. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:917-921
19. (Pubitemid 29476439) MacLennan A. A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ 1999;319:1054- 1059
20. Nathan L, Leveno KJ, Carmody TJ III, Kelly AM, Sherman ML. 21Meconium: a 1990's perspective on an old obstetric hazard. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:329-332
21. Katz VL, Bowes WA Jr. Meconium aspiration syndrome: reflections on a murky subject. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166: 171-183
22. Wiswell TE, Bent RC. Meconium staining and then meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am 1993;40:955-981
23. Greenwood C, Lalchandani S, MacQuillan K, Sheil O. Meconium passed in labor: how reassuring is clear amniotic fluid? Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:89-93
24. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 10. Washington, DC: ACOG; November 1999
25. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 49. Washington, DC: ACOG; December 2003
26. (Pubitemid 36792123) Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:52-58
27. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:933-938
28. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Laros RK, Caughey AB. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:585
29. Heritage CK, Cunningham MD. Association of elective repeat cesarean delivery and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152: 627-629
30. (Pubitemid 32184709) Levine Em, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:439-442