Adverse obstetric outcomes in women with previous cesarean for dystocia in second stage of labor

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 173-178

  Jastrow, Nicole ^a   Demers, Suzanne ^b   Gauthier, Robert J ^c   Chaillet, Nils ^c   Brassard, Normand ^b   Bujold, Emmanuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

labor dystocia; pregnancy; uterine rupture; vaginal birth after cesarean

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERUS RUPTURE;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84876014457     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1322515     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 1279 1295
2. McMahon M. J., Luther E. R., Bowes W. A. Jr, Olshan A. F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med: 1996; 335 689 695 (Pubitemid 26287354)
3. Landon M. B., Hauth J. C., Leveno K. J., et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med: 2004; 351 2581 2589 (Pubitemid 39628579)
4. Scifres C. M., Rohn A., Odibo A., Stamilio D., Macones G. A. Predicting significant maternal morbidity in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Perinatol: 2011; 28 181 186
5. Paré E., Quiñones J. N., Macones G. A. Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG: 2006; 113 75 85
6. Kennare R., Tucker G., Heard A., Chan A. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol: 2007; 109 2 Pt 1 270 276 (Pubitemid 46197415)
7. Grobman W. A., Lai Y., Landon M. B., et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol: 2009; 26 693 701
8. Grobman W. A., Lai Y., Landon M. B., et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 200 56, e1-e6
9. Grobman W. A., Lai Y., Landon M. B., et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol: 2007; 109 806 812 (Pubitemid 46559066)
10. Costantine M. M., Fox K. A., Pacheco L. D., et al. Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort. Am J Perinatol: 2011; 28 293 298
11. Dharan V. B., Srinivas S. K., Parry S., Ratcliffe S. J., Macones G. Pregestational diabetes: a risk factor for vaginal birth after cesarean section failure? Am J Perinatol: 2010; 27 265 270
12. Ouzounian J. G., Miller D. A., Hiebert C. J., Battista L. R., Lee R. H. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction. Am J Perinatol: 2011; 28 593 596
13. Hendler I., Bujold E. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 104 273 277 (Pubitemid 40458872)
14. Landon M. B., Leindecker S., Spong C. Y., et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2005; 193 3 Pt 2 1016 1023 (Pubitemid 41285487)
15. Miller D. A., Diaz F. G., Paul R. H. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol: 1994; 84 255 258 (Pubitemid 24234838)
16. Bujold E., Gauthier R. J. Should we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor? Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 98 652 655 (Pubitemid 32907462)
17. Jongen V. H., Halfwerk M. G., Brouwer W. K. Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section for failure of second stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol: 1998; 105 1079 1081 (Pubitemid 28461500)
18. Jastrow N., Roberge S., Gauthier R. J., et al. Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 2 Pt 1 338 343
19. Hamilton E. F., Bujold E., McNamara H., Gauthier R., Platt R. W. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 184 620 624 (Pubitemid 32234975)
20. Bujold E., Bujold C., Hamilton E. F., Harel F., Gauthier R. J. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2002; 186 1326 1330 (Pubitemid 34665079)
21. Bujold E., Goyet M., Marcoux S., et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 116 43 50
22. Bujold E., Gauthier R. J. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 1003 1006
23. Hoskins I. A., Gomez J. L. Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol: 1997; 89 591 593 (Pubitemid 27133535)
24. Flamm B. L., Goings J. R. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication? Obstet Gynecol: 1989; 74 694 697 (Pubitemid 19264203)
25. Phelan J. P., Eglinton G. S., Horenstein J. M., Clark S. L., Yeh S. Previous cesarean birth. Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants. J Reprod Med: 1984; 29 36 40 (Pubitemid 14179770)
26. Elkousy M. A., Sammel M., Stevens E., Peipert J. F., Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2003; 188 824 830 (Pubitemid 36332459)
27. Zelop C. M., Shipp T. D., Repke J. T., Cohen A., Lieberman E. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 185 903 905 (Pubitemid 32980535)
28. Rageth J. C., Juzi C., Grossenbacher H. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol: 1999; 93 332 337 (Pubitemid 29106986)
29. Khan K. S., Rizvi A. The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: 1995; 50 151 157
30. Boutin A., Bérubé L., Girard M., Bujold E. Labour before a caesarean section and the morphology of the lower uterine segment in the next pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can: 2011; 33 105
31. Zimmer E. Z., Bardin R., Tamir A., Bronshtein M. Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 23 594 598 (Pubitemid 38829870)
32. Laflamme S. MB, Jastrow N., Girard M., Paris G., Bérubé L., Bujold E. Pitfall in ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar from prior preterm cesarean section. Am J Perinatol Rep: 2011; 1 65 68
33. Rozenberg P., Goffinet F., Phillippe H. J., Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet: 1996; 347 281 284 (Pubitemid 26041038)
34. Bujold E., Jastrow N., Simoneau J., Brunet S., Gauthier R. J. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 201 320, e1-e6