Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 197, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 306.e1-306.e5

  Sung, Joyce F ^a   Daniels, Kay I ^a   Brodzinsky, Laura ^a   El Sayed, Yasser Y ^a   Caughey, Aaron B ^b   Lyell, Deirdre J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean delivery; hysterotomy extension; maternal morbidity; prolonged second stage of labor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; HYSTEROTOMY; LABOR STAGE 2; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; UTERINE CERVIX;

EID: 34548454136     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Friedman E.A. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 6 (1955) 567-589
2. Hellman L.M., and Prystowsky H. The duration of the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 63 (1952) 1223-1233
3. Cohen W.R. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 49 (1977) 266-269
4. Kilpatrick S.J., and Laros R.K. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 74 (1989) 85-87
5. Myles T.D., and Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 102 (2003) 52-58
6. Saunders N., Paterson C.M., and Wadworth J. Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour. BJOG 99 (1992) 381-385
7. Cheng Y.W., Hopkins L.M., and Caughey A.B. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004) 933-938
8. O'Connell M.P., Hussain J., Maclennan F.A., and Lindow S.W. Factors associated with a prolonged second stage of labour: a case-controlled study of 364 nulliparous labours. J Obstet Gynaecol 23 (2003) 255-257
9. Menticoglou S.M., Manning F., Harman C., and Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173 (1995) 906-912
10. Paterson C.M., and Saunders N. The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames health region, 1988. BJOG 99 (1992) 377-380
11. Janni W., Schiessl B., Peschers U., et al. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81 (2002) 214-221
12. Cebekulu L., and Buchman E.J. Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95 (2006) 110-114
13. Allen V.M., O'Connell C.M., and Baskett T.F. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. BJOG 112 (2005) 986-990
14. Alexander J.M., Leveno K.J., Rouse D.J., et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 109 (2007) 917-921
15. Vyas N.A., Vink J.S., Ghidini A., et al. Risk factors for cervical insufficiency after term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 (2006) 787-791
16. Moinian M., and Andersch R. Does cervix conization increase the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61 (1982) 101-103