Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7569, 2006, Pages 613-614

  Spencer, Chris ^a   Murphy, Deirdre ^b   Bewley, Susan ^c  

^a ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLADDER INJURY; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; EDITORIAL; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL STAFF; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 33749017944     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38971.466979.DE     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the General Practice Research Database. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:151-3.
2. Allen VM, O' Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:986-90.
3. Olah KS. Reversal of the decision for Caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. J Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:115-6.
4. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ 2004;328:311.
5. Armstrong CA, Harding S, Matthews T, Dickinson JE. Is placenta accreta catching up with us? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:210-3.
6. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit The national sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
7. Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:896-902.
8. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan A. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83.
9. Persad VL, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM, Scott HM. Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1032-7.
10. Yang Q, Wen SW, Chen Y, Krewski D, Fung KF, Walker M. Occurrence and clinical predictors of operative delivery for the second twin after normal vaginal delivery of the first twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:178-84.
11. Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:1139-44.
12. Bider D, Korach J, Hourvitz A, Dulitzky M, Goldenberg M, Mashiach S. Combined vaginal-abdominal delivery of twins. J Reprod Med 1995;40:131-4.