Comparison of detection and miss rates of narrow band imaging, flexible spectral imaging chromoendoscopy and white light at screening colonoscopy: A randomised controlled back-to-back study

Gut

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 785-791

  Chung, Su Jin ^a   Kim, Donghee ^a   Song, Ji Hyun ^a   Kang, Hae Yeon ^a   Chung, Goh Eun ^a   Choi, Jeongmin ^b   Kim, Young Sun ^a   Park, Min Jung ^a   Kim, Joo Sung ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE SPECTRAL IMAGING CHROMOENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCREENING; WHITE LIGHT COLONOSCOPY; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY;

ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; SCREENING;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LEARNING CURVE; LIGHT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARROW BAND IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84898009644     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304578     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-50. (Pubitemid 43381678)
2. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008;40:284-90. (Pubitemid 351524375)
3. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
4. Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Friedland S, et al.; American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technology assessment on image-enhanced endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2008;134:327-40. (Pubitemid 350309331)
5. Emura F, Saito Y, Ikematsu H. Narrow-band imaging optical chromocolonoscopy: advantages and limitations. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4867-72.
6. Ng SC, Lau JY. Narrow-band imaging in the colon: limitations and potentials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:1589-96.
7. Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC, et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007;56:373-9.
8. Hirata M, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:988-95. (Pubitemid 46783816)
9. Sikka S, Ringold DA, Jonnalagadda S, et al. Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magni fication. Endoscopy 2008;40:818-22.
10. Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C, et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 2009;58:73-8.
11. Kim YS, Kim D, Chung SJ, et al. Differentiating small polyp histologies using real-time screening colonoscopy with Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:744-9.
12. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007;133:42-7. (Pubitemid 47031129)
13. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 2008;57:59-64.
14. Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N, et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2008;43:45-50. (Pubitemid 351324985)
15. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A, et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:1049-54.
16. Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, et al. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:136-42.
17. Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-defi nition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and predication of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:593-602.
18. Sabbagh LC, Reveiz L, Aponte D, et al. Narrow-band imaging does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of published studies. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:100.
19. van den Broek FJ, Reitsma JB, Curvers WL, et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:124-35.
20. Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:363-70.
21. Nagorni A, Bjelakovic G, Petrovic B. Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(1):CD008361.
22. Dinesen L, Chua TJ, Kaffes AJ. Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:604-11.
23. Jin XF, Chai TH, Shi JW, et al. Meta-analysis for evaluating the accuracy of endoscopy with narrow band imaging in detecting colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;27:882-7.
24. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al.; ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
25. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61. (Pubitemid 46496608)
26. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
27. Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy 2005;37:570-8.
28. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA.eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. 2nd edn. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, 2000:104-9.
29. Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, et al. Prevalence and risk of colorectal adenoma in asymptomatic Koreans aged 40-49 years undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:519-25.
30. Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009;136:410-16.
31. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 2008;57:1406-12.
32. Gross SA, Buchner AM, Crook JE, et al. A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection. Endoscopy 2011;43:1045-51.
33. Ikematsu H, Saito Y, Tanaka S, et al. The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol 2012;47:1099-107.
34. East JE, Ignjatovic A, Suzuki N, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of narrow-band imaging vs high-de finition white light for adenoma detection in patients at high risk of adenomas. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e771-8.
35. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:364-70.
36. Wada Y, Kudo SE, Kashida H, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:522-31.
37. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013;45:142-50.
38. Mathus-Vliegen E, Pellisé M, Heresbach D, et al. Consensus guidelines for the use of bowel preparation prior to colonic diagnostic procedures: colonoscopy and small bowel video capsule endoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin.Published Online First: 4 June 2013. doi:10.1185/03007995.2013.803055