The Impact of Narrow Band Imaging in Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1049-1054

  Paggi, Silvia ^a   Radaelli, Franco ^a   Amato, Arnaldo ^a   Meucci, Gianmichele ^a   Mandelli, Giovanni ^a   Imperiali, Gianni ^a   Spinzi, Giancarlo ^a   Terreni, Natalia ^a   Lenoci, Nicoletta ^a   Terruzzi, Vittorio ^a  

^a VALDUCE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD EXAMINATION; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OCCULT BLOOD; SCREENING; WHITE LIGHT;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FECES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70349556315     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Murray T., et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55 (2005) 10-30
2. Allen J.I. Molecular biology of colon polyps and colon cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 11 (1995) 399-405
3. Rex D.K. Colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2000) 135-160
4. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 777-782
5. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
6. van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 343-350
7. Heresbach D., Barrioz T., Lapalus M.G., et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 284-290
8. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy: the National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329 (1993) 1977-1981
9. Rembacken B.J., Fujii T., Cairns A., et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355 (2000) 1211-1214
10. Tsuda S., Veress B., Tóth E., et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51 (2002) 550-555
11. Soetikno R.M., Kaltenbach T., Rouse R.V., et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 299 (2008) 1027-1035
12. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
13. Imperiali G., Minoli G., Meucci G.M., et al. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 314-318
14. Deenadayalu V.P., Chadalawada V., and Rex D.K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 2138-2142
15. Rex D.K., Chadalawada V., and Helper D.J. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2000-2005
16. Triadafilopoulos G., Watts H.D., Higgins J., et al. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 139-144
17. Triadafilopoulos G., and Li J. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 478-482
18. Lee Y.T., Hui A.J., Wong V.W., et al. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 38 (2006) 739-742
19. Horiuchi A., and Nakayama Y. Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device. Am J Gastroenterol 103 (2008) 341-345
20. Pellisé M., Fernández-Esparrach G., Cárdenas A., et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 135 (2008) 1062-1068
21. East J.E., Stavrindis M., Thomas-Gibson S., et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28 (2008) 768-776
22. Brown S.R., Baraza W., and Hurlstone P. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) CD006439
23. Apel D., Jakobs R., Schilling D., et al. Accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy in prediction of histologic findings in diminutive lesions of the rectosigmoid. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 824-828
24. Stergiou N., Frenz M.B., Menke D., et al. Reduction of miss rates of colonic adenomas by zoom chromoendoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 21 (2006) 560-565
25. Johanson J.F. Practicality of high-resolution chromoendoscopy during routine screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 829-830
26. Song L.M., Adler D.G., Conway J.D., et al., ASGE Technology Committee. Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) 581-589
27. Inoue T., Murano M., Murano N., et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 43 (2008) 45-50
28. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 57 (2008) 59-64
29. Rex D.K., and Helbig C.C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 133 (2007) 42-47
30. Aronchick C.A., Lipshutz W.H., Wright S.H., et al. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 52 (2000) 346-352
31. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58 Suppl (2003) S3-S43
32. Kudo S., Hirota S., Nakajima T., et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol 47 (1994) 880-885
33. Manfredi S., Piette C., Durand G., et al. Colonoscopy results of a French regional FOBT-based colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 422-427
34. Kaltenbach T., Friedland S., and Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 57 (2008) 1406-1412