Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: A prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 284-290

  Heresbach, Denis ^a   Barrioz, T ^b   Lapalus, M G ^c   Coumaros, D ^d   Bauret, P ^e   Potier, P ^f   Sautereau, D ^g   Boustiere C ^h   Grimaud, J C ⁱ   Barthelemy C ^j   See J ^k   Serraj, I ^c   D'Halluin, P N ^a   Branger, B ^a   Ponchon, T ^c  

^a PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^d HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

^e HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

^f CENTRE HOSPITALIER RÉGIONAL D ORLÉANS   (France)

^g DUPUYTREN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^h HÔPITAL SAINT JOSEPH   (France)

ⁱ HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^j HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^k HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARCINOID; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON DIVERTICULOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COLORECTAL DISEASE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASTIC POLYP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 42149191176     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995618     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769-1772
2. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28
3. Bensen S, Mott IA, Dain B et al for the Polyp Prevention Study Group. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 194-199
4. Kasugal K, Miyata M, Hashimoto T et al. Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscopy. Dig Endosc 2005; 17: 44-49
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. and the National Polyp Study Workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
6. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut 2001; 48: 753-754
7. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut 1996; 55: 1145-1150
8. Rex DK, Bond JH, Feld AD. Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 952-957
9. Rex DK, Lieberman DA. Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 662-667
10. Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Rex DK. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer; evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 451-455
11. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Winden C et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer; a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 452-456
12. Schoen RE. Surveillance after positive and negative colonoscopy examinations; issues, yields, and use. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1237-1246
13. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary polyp prevention trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 385-391
14. Graham M, Jegendirabose P, Leiper K. WED-E-278 colonoscopic miss-rate for colorectal cancer in usual clinical practice. Endoscopy 2005; 37: A275
15. Panadès A Seoane A Torra S et al. MON-G-274 colonoscopic miss rates for colorectal cancer. Gut 2005; 54: A139
16. Robertson DJ, Mott L, Baron JA, the Polyp Prevention Study Group. Colorectal cancer after "clearing" colonoscopy: experience from 3 large adenoma chemoprevention trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: S123
17. Lieberman D. Quality and colonoscopy; a new imperative. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 392-394
18. Ee Hc, Semmens JB, Hoffman NE for the Perth Teaching Hospitals Endoscopy Group. Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 167-171
19. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New Engl J Med 2003: 349: 2191-2200
20. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291: 1713-1719
21. Van Rijn J, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-350
22. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 481-485
23. Gschwantler M, Ktiwanek S, Longner E et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 14: 183-188
24. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A et al. Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Collorect Dis 1997; 12: 267-271
25. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 343-348
26. Bressler B, Paszat L, Rothwell D et al. Predictors of missed colorectal cancer during colonoscopy: a population-based analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 61: AB107
27. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1941-1945
28. Barclay RI, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
29. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 33-36
30. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 965-971