A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection

Endoscopy

Volumn 43, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1045-1051

  Gross, S A ^a   Buchner, A M ^a   Crook, J E ^a   Cangemi, J R ^a   Picco, M F ^a   Wolfsen, H C ^a   Devault, K R ^a   Loeb, D S ^a   Raimondo, M ^a   Woodward, T A ^a   Wallace, M B ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM POLYP; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY;

AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS;

EID: 82755185010     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256894     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin: 2008; 58 71 96 (Pubitemid 351521864)
2. Kim EC, Lance P. Colorectal polyps and their relationship to cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am: 1997; 26 1 17 (Pubitemid 27104401)
3. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology: 1997; 112 24 28 (Pubitemid 27008981)
4. Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol: 2003; 98 2000 2005 (Pubitemid 37185796)
5. Wallace MB. Improving colorectal adenoma detection: technology or technique? Gastroenterology: 2007; 132 1221 1223 (Pubitemid 46627618)
6. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology: 2008; 134 1570 1595 (Pubitemid 351615355)
7. Davison AC, Hinkley D. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge Cambridge University Press: 2006
8. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med: 2010; 362 1795 1803
9. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med: 2009; 150 1 8 (Epub 2008 Dec 15)
10. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet: 2010; 375 1624 1633
11. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. The National Polyp Study Workgroup et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med: 1993; 329 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
12. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 343 350 (Pubitemid 43381678)
13. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol: 2004; 99 2138 2142 (Pubitemid 39524703)
14. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2008; 6 109 114 (Pubitemid 50008421)
15. Trecca A, Gaj F, DiLorenzo GP et al. Improved detection of colorectal neoplasms with selective use of chromoendoscopy in 2005 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol: 2006; 10 339 344 (Pubitemid 46142594)
16. Lee JH, Kim JW, Cho YK et al. Detection of colorectal adenomas by routine chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine. Am J Gastroenterol: 2003; 98 1284 1288 (Pubitemid 36741523)
17. Lecomte T, Cellier C, Meatchi T et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2005; 3 897 902 (Pubitemid 41219293)
18. Lapalus MG, Helbert T, Napoleon B et al. Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate? Endoscopy: 2006; 38 444 448 (Pubitemid 43744700)
19. Ratiu N, Gelbmann C, Rath HR et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: does it improve the detection of adenomas in the distal colon and rectum? J Gastrointestin Liver Dis: 2007; 16 153 156 (Pubitemid 47011906)
20. Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 2711 2716
21. Tischendorf JJ, Wasmuth HE, Koch A et al. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 1092 1096
22. Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut: 2007; 56 373 379
23. Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy: 2004; 36 1089 1093 (Pubitemid 39642470)
24. Axelrad AM, Fleischer DE, Geller AJ et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of diminutive colon polyps: implications for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology: 1996; 110 1253 1258 (Pubitemid 26113766)
25. Helbig C. Chromoendoscopy and its alternatives for colonoscopy: useful in the United States? Rev Gastroenterol Disord: 2006; 6 209 220 (Pubitemid 46139123)
26. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology: 2007; 133 42 47 (Pubitemid 47031129)
27. Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol: 2008; 43 45 50 (Pubitemid 351324985)
28. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2009; 7 1049 1054
29. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut: 2008; 57 59 64
30. Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology: 2009; 136 410 416 (e1; quiz 715. Epub 2008 Oct 15)
31. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut: 2008; 57 1406 1412
32. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 8 364 370 (Erratum in Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 280. Epub 2009 Nov 22)
33. Rey JF, Tanaka S, Lambert R et al. Evaluation of the clinical outcomes associated with EXERA II and LUCERA endoscopes. Dig Endosc: 2009; 21 Suppl. 01 S113 S120