Pulsus a mortuus equus

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 36-45

  Bowman, S Jay ^a,b,c,d  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SETON HILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897792265     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2013.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Angle E.H. The Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth 1907, SS White, Philadelphia. 7th ed.
2. Mew J. The curve of Spee. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 135(1):3. [author reply 3-4]. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.009.
3. Thompson G. Straight talker: James Boley. Orthod Prod 2010, 14-18.
4. O'Grady P.W., McNamara J.A., Baccetti T., et al. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 130(2):202-213.
5. Ferris T., Alexander R.G., Boley J., et al. Long-term stability of combined rapid palatal expansion-lip bumper therapy followed by full fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005, 128(3):310-325.
6. Korn M. Aberrant eruption and its relationship to crowding: the need for early detection and management. Alpha Omegan 1999, 92(4):19-27.
7. Damon D. JCO interviews. J Clin Orthod 2013, 46(11):667-678.
8. Ferro F., Funiciello G., Perillo L., et al. Mandibular lip bumper treatment and second molar eruption disturbances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011, 139(5):622-627. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.024.
9. Gianelly A.A. Rapid palatal expansion in the absence of crossbites: added value?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 124:362-365.
10. Dugoni S.A., Lee J.S., Varela J., et al. Early mixed dentition treatment: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1995, 65:311-320.
11. Fichera G., Greco M., Leonardi R. Effectiveness of the passive lingual arch for E space maintenance in subjects with anterior or posterior rotation of the mandible: a retrospective study. Med Princ Pract 2011, 20(2):165-170. [10.1159/000319914; Epub 2011 Jan 20].
12. Owais A.I., Rousan M.E., Badran S.A., et al. Effectiveness of a lower lingual arch as a space holding device. Eur J Orthod 2011, 33(1):37-42. [10.1093/ejo/cjq022; Epub 2010 Jul 25].
13. Bowman SJ. Altering the extraction decision with miniscrews part II. Orthotown; 2011:44-51.
14. Sonis A., Ackerman M. E-space preservation. Angle Orthod 2011, 81(6):1045-1049. [10.2319/030711-165.1; Epub 2011 May 25].
15. Rubin R.L., Baccetti T., McNamara J.A. Mandibular second molar eruption difficulties related to the maintenance of arch perimeter in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012, 141(2):146-152. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.040.
16. Sable D.L., Woods M.G. Growth and treatment changes distal to the mandibular first molar: a lateral cephalometric study. Angle Orthod 2004, 74(3):367-374.
17. Little R.M., Reidel R.A., Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990, 97(5):393-404.
18. Kandasamy S. Schwarz expansion appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 130(6):697. [author reply 697].
19. Gianelly A. An interview with Anthony Gianelly. World J Orthod 2004, 5(4):365-367. [Winter].
20. McNamara J.A. Long-term adaptations to changes in transverse dimension in juveniles and adolescents. When to Treat? Making Decisions: A Symposium on Early Treatment 2005, American Association of Orthodontists, Las Vegas, NV.
21. Rinchuse D.J., Kandasamy S. Implications of the inclination of the mandibular first molars in the extractionist versus expansionist debate. World J Orthod 2008, 9(4):383-390. [Winter].
22. McNamara L.J., McNamara J.A., Ackerman M.B., et al. Hard and soft tissue contributions to the esthetics of a posed smile in growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008, 133:491-499.
23. Spahl T.J. Premolar extractions and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 124(1):16A-17A. [author reply 17A].
24. 〈〉 Accessed 03.07.13. http://www.damagedfaces.com.
25. Straight Talk. 60 minutes (Australia) National Nine Network. Available at: 〈〉 Accessed 03.07.13. http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com/article/259072/straight-talk.
26. Beattie J.R., Paquette D.E., Johnston L.E. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with "borderline," equally susceptible class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994, 105(5):444-449.
27. Hagler B.L., Lupini J., Johnston L.E. Long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction alternatives in matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998, 114(4):393-403.
28. Paquette D.E., Beattie J.R., Johnston L.E. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992, 102(1):1-14.
29. Erdinc A.E., Nanda R.S., Dandajena T.C. Long-term soft-tissue profile changes (4 years postretention) demonstrated no clinically significant correlations between hard- and soft-tissue variables. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 132(3):324-331.
30. Xu T.M., Liu Y., Yang M.Z., et al. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 129(5):672-677.
31. Lim H., Ko K., Hwang H. Esthetic impact of premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment on Korean borderline patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008, 133(4):524-531. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.051.
32. Khan M., Fida M. Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010, 20(7):454-459. [04.2010/JCPSP.454459].
33. Almeida-Pedrin A., Almeida M., Ferreira-Pedrin F., et al. Assessment of facial profile changes in patients treated with maxillary premolar extractions. Dental Press J Orthod 2012, 17(5):131-137.
34. Boley J.C., Pontier J.P., Smith S., et al. Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod 1998, 68(6):539-546.
35. Bishara S.E., Cummins D.M., Zaher A.R. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997, 111(1):18-27.
36. Stephens C.K., Boley J.C., Behrents R.G., et al. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005, 128:450-457.
37. Diels R.M., Lalra V., DeLoach N., et al. Changes in soft tissue profile on African-Americans following extraction treatment. Angle Orthod 1995, 65:285-292.
38. Marques L.S., Chaves K.C., Ramos-Jorge M.L., et al. Extraction of four premolars in Black patients with bi-protrusion: aesthetic perceptions of professionals and lay people. J Orthod 2011, 38(2):107-112. [10.1179/14653121141335].
39. Basciftci F.A., Usumez S. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects. Angle Orthod 2003, 73(1):36-42.
40. Bowman S.J., Johnston L.E. The esthetic impact of extraction and non-extraction treatments of caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000, 701:3-10.
41. Drobocky O.B., Smith R.J. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989, 95:220-230.
42. Young T., Smith R. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of change during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993, 103:452-458.
43. Zierhut E.C., Joondeph D.R., Artun J., et al. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2000, 70(3):208-219.
44. Luppanapornlarp S., Johnston L.E. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in clear-cut extraction and nonextraction class II patients. Angle Orthod 1993, 63(4):257-272. [Winter].
45. Gòmez AL. The esthetic impact of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions for Mexican patients. Masters Thesis, Centro de Estudios Superiores de Ortodoncia, Mexico City; 2001.
46. Mejia-Maidl M., Evans C.A., Viana G., et al. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod 2005, 75(6):953-958.
47. Nomura M., Motegi E., Hatch J.P., et al. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 135(4 suppl):S87-S95. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.019.
48. Soh J., Chew M.T., Wong H.B. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005, 127:692-699.
49. Bowman SJ. Altering the extraction decision with miniscrews part I. Orthotown. 2011:42-49.
50. Sarver D.M., Ackerman J.L. Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 117(5):575-576.
51. Hayasaki S.M., Castanha Henriques J.F., et al. Influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in Japanese-Brazilians with class I and class II division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005, 127(1):30-36.
52. Staggers J.A. Vertical changes following first premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994, 105(1):19-24.
53. Chua A.L., Lim J.Y., Lubit E.C. The effects of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the growth of the lower anterior face height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993, 104(4):361-368.
54. Kumari M., Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010, 20:17-21. [01.2010/JCPSP.1721].
55. Hans M.G., Groisser G., Damon C., et al. Cephalometric changes in overbite and vertical facial height after removal of 4 first molars or first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 130(2):183-188.
56. Al-Nimri K.S. Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions. Angle Orthod 2006, 76(1):52-58.
57. Kocadereli I. The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999, 116(1):41-45.
58. Gkantidis N., Halazonetis D.J., Alexandropoulos E., et al. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent class II division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011, 140(3):346-355. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.015.
59. Parekh S., Fields H.W., Beck F.M., et al. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007, 10(1):15-21.
60. Muñoz-Morente R.J., Ferrer-Molina M. Extraction versus nonextraction: esthetic effect on the smile. Orthod Esp 2004, 44:3-13.
61. Hulsey C.M. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970, 57:132-144.
62. Zange S.E., Ramos A.L., Cuoghi O.A., et al. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals. Angle Orthod 2011, 81(1):86-90. [10.2319/031210-145.1].
63. Roden-Johnson D., Gallerano R., English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005, 127:343-350.
64. Ghaffar F., Fida M. Effect of extraction of first four premolars on smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2011, 33(6):679-683. [10.1093/ejo/cjq133; Epub 2011 Jan 12].
65. Isiksal E., Hazar S., Akyalçin S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 129:8-16.
66. Rigsbee O.H., Sperry T.P., BeGole E.A. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1988, 3:233-239.
67. Işik F., Sayinsu K., Nalbantgil D., et al. A comparative study of dental arch widths: extraction and non-extraction treatment. Eur J Orthod 2005, 27(6):585-589.
68. Kim E., Gianelly A.A. Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics. Angle Orthod 2003, 73(4):354-358.
69. Al Maaitah E., El Said N., Abu Alhaija E.S. First premolar extraction effects on upper airway dimension in bimaxillary proclination patients. Angle Orthod 2012, 82(5):853-859. [10.2319/101711-646.1; Epub 2012 Feb 27].
70. Valiathan M., El H., Hans M.G., Palomo M.J. Effects of extraction versus non-extraction treatment on oropharyngeal airway volume. Angle Orthod 2010, 80(6):1068-1074. [10.2319/010810-19.1].
71. Burke S.P., Silveira A.M., Goldsmith L.J., et al. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1998, 68:53-60.
72. Damon D.H. Treatment of the face with biocompatible orthodontics. Orthodontics, Current Principles and Techniques 2005, Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis. T.M. Graber, R.L. Vanarsdall, K.W. Vig (Eds.).
73. Loh P., Mahony D. Low-Friction Orthodontics: Principles and Clinical Practice 2006, Fourways, Manilla.
74. Fok J., Toogood R.W., Badawi H., et al. Analysis of maxillary arch force/couple systems for a simulated high canine malocclusion: part 2. Elastic ligation. Angle Orthod 2011, 81(6):960-965. [10.2319/012011-41.1; Epub 2011 Jun 14].
75. Paquette D. A bracket is a bracket is a bracket is nonsense. Orthotown 2011, 40.
76. Bagden, MA. Self-ligation: facts and fiction. American Association of Orthodontists Annual Session. Washington, DC; May 3, 2010.
77. Kokich V.G., Kokich V.O. Congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: clinical options. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 130(4):437-444.
78. Ren Y., Maltha J.C., Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M. Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2003, 73:86-92.
79. Paventy A.M. Nonextraction treatment using the Damon system: a CBCT evaluation. Book of Abstracts. 109th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists; 2009.
80. Cattaneo P.M., Treccani M., Carlsson K., et al. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011, 14(4):222-233. [10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01527.x].
81. Ahmed A, Evren Ö. Evaluation of the effects of Damon system on the upper arch expansion with cone beam computed tomography: two case reports. Abstracts of the 7th International Orthodontic Congress. Sydney, Australia, February 6-9; 2010.
82. Mikulencak D.M. A comparison of maxillary arch width and molar tipping changes between rapid maxillary expansion and fixed appliance vs the Damon system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 132:562. [10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.021].
83. Pandis N., Eliades T., Bourauel C. Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2009, 31(6):590-595. [10.1093/ejo/cjn107; Epub 2009 Apr 6].
84. Vajaria R., BeGole E., Kusnoto B., et al. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod 2011, 81:647-652.
85. Scott P., DiBiase A.T., Sherriff M., et al. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008, 134(4). [470.e1-8]. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.018.
86. Askari, M. CBCT assessment of dental and skeletal arch changes using the Damon vs. conventional (MBT) system. University of Maryland. Baltimore. Biomedical Sciences-Dental School; 2012.
87. Yu Y.L., Tang G.H., Gong F.F., et al. A comparison of rapid palatal expansion and Damon appliance on non-extraction correction of dental crowding. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2008, 17(3):237-242.
88. Waters D., Harris E.F. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001, 120(6):608-613.
89. O'Brien K., Sandler J. In the land of no evidence, is the salesman king?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010, 138(3):247-249. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.010.
90. Kim T.W., Artun J., Behbehani F., et al. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extraction of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 123(2):138-145.
91. Kandasamy S., Woods M.G. Is orthodontic treatment without premolar extractions always non-extraction treatment?. Aust Dent J 2005, 50(3):146-151.
92. Xu T., Liu Y., Huang W., Lin J. Cephalometric comparison of hard-tissue morphology between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2003, 35(6):654-658.
93. Boley J.C. An extraction approach to borderline tooth size to arch length problems in patients with satisfactory profiles. Semin Orthod 2001, 7:100-106.
94. Germeç D., Taner T.U. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008, 133(4):539-549.
95. Shearn B., Woods M. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000, 117:351-361.
96. Staggers J.A. A comparison of results of second molar and first premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990, 98(5):430-436.
97. Park H.S., Bae S.M., Kyung H.M., et al. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 2001, 35:417-422.
98. Park H.S., Kwon T.G., Sung J.H. Nonextraction treatment with microscrew implants. Angle Orthod 2004, 74:539-549.
99. Saysel M.Y., Meral G.D., Kocadereli I., et al. The effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulations. Angle Orthod 2005, 75(5):719-722.
100. Jain S., Valiathan A. Influence of first premolar extraction on mandibular third molar angulation. Angle Orthod 2009, 79(6):1143-1148. [10.2319/100708-525.R.1].
101. Russell B., Skvara M., Draper E., et al. The association between orthodontic treatment with removal of premolars and the angulation of developing mandibular third molars over time. Angle Orthod 2013, 83:376-380.