Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 454-459

  Khan, Munizeh ^a   Fida, Mubassar ^a  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Cephalometric analysis; IMPA (mandibular incisor to mandibular plane angle); Premolar extractions; Soft tissue profile

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; LIP MALFORMATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; PAKISTAN; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; SOFT TISSUE; STUDENT T TEST; TOOTH EXTRACTION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 77955855328     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Erbay EF, Caniklioglu CM. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 65-72.
2. Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64:407-14. Comment in: p. 403.
3. Ribarevski R, Vig P, Vig KD, Weyant R, O'Brien K. Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18:77-80.
4. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. 3rd ed. Missouri: Elsevier Inc 2000.
5. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in 'clear-cut' extraction and non-extraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 1993; 63:257-72.
6. Ismail SF, Moss JP. The three-dimensional effects of orthodontic treatment on the facial tissues: a preliminary study. Br Dent J 2002; 192:104-8.
7. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Zaher AR. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and non-extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111:18-27.
8. Wholley CJ, Woods MG. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips. Angle Orthod 2003; 73:386-95.
9. Kumari M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20:17-21.
10. Caplan MJ, Shivapuja PK. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft tissue profile of adult African American females. Angle Orthod 1997; 67:129-36. Erratum in: Angle Orthod 1997; 67(3):240.
11. Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda R. Effects of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118:505-13.
12. Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132:324-31.
13. Bravo LA, Canut JA, Pascual A, Bravo B. Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions. Br J Orthod 1997; 24:25-34.
14. Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:67-72. (Pubitemid 40433011)
15. Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG, Alexander RG, Buschange PH. Long-term profile changes in extraction and non-extraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:450-7.
16. Young TM, Smith RJ. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during non-extraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103:452-8.
17. Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 31-42.
18. Scott Conley R, Jernigan C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:59-65.
19. Bowman SJ, Johnston LE Jr. The esthetic impact of extraction and non-extraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70:3-10.
20. Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ, Huang W. Comparison of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:672-7.
21. Basciftci FA, Usumez S. Effects of extraction and non-extraction treatment on Class I and II subjects. Angle Orthod 2003; 73:36-42. (Pubitemid 38968919)
22. Tadic N, Woods MG. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod 2007; 77:808-16.
23. Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91:385-94.
24. Kasai K. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113:674-84.