Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 36-42

  Basciftci, Faruk Ayhan ^a   Usumez, Serdar ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Extraction; Nonextraction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHODONTICS; SCHOOL CHILD; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH MALFORMATION; CHILD; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NOSE; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELLA TURCICA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH ARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; DENTAL ARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MAXILLA; NOSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELLA TURCICA; SERIAL EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038622942     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, Division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107: 129-135.
2. Angle EH. Malocclusion of the Teeth and Fractures of the Maxillae. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: SS White Dental Mfg Co; 1900: 15-23.
3. Angle EH. Malocclusion of the Teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: SS White Dental Mfg Co; 1907.
4. Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics. Vol 1. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1966:31-82.
5. Rossouw PE. A Longitudinal Study of the Stability of the Dentition Following Orthodontic Treatment [PhD dissertation]. Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa: University of Stellenbosch; 1992. In: Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:3-10.
6. Sandusky WC III. A Long-Term Postretention Study of Tweed Extraction Treatment [master's thesis]. Memphis, Tenn: University of Tennessee; 1983. In: Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:3-10.
7. Franklin GS, Rossouw PE, Woodside DG. A longitudinal study of dental and skeletal parameters associated with stability of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:452-453.
8. Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:462-466.
9. O'Connor BMP. Contemporary trends in orthodontic practice: a national survey. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:163-170.
10. Sadowsky C. The risk of orthodontic treatment for producing temporomandibular mandibular disorders: a literature overview. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:79-83.
11. Luecke PE III, Johnston LE Jr. The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of "functional orthodontics". Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:4-12.
12. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9:73-90.
13. Greene CS. Etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:222-228.
14. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:162-167.
15. Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:1-14.
16. Beattie JR, Paquette DE, Johnston LE Jr. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with "borderline," equally susceptible Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:444-449.
17. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of premolar-extraction treatment: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63:257-272.
18. Livieratos FA, Johnston LE Jr. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:118-131.
19. Johnston LE Jr. Growing jaws for fun and profit: a modest proposal. In: McNamara JA Jr, ed. What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Craniofacial Growth Series 35. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1998:63-86.
20. Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:3-10.
21. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jacobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes to Class II Division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107:28-37.
22. Young T, Smith R. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of change during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103: 452-458.
23. Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:31-42.
24. Scott SH, Johnston LE Jr. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:352-358.
25. Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:220-230.
26. Kirkwood BR. Essentials of Medical Statistics. London, UK: Blackwell Science; 1996.
27. Houston WBJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
28. Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and non-extraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:208-219.
29. Finnoy JP, Wisth PJ, Boe OE. Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:68-78.
30. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod. 1957;27:14-37.
31. Bishara SE, Hession TJ, Peterson LC. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88:209-223.
32. Beget BC. A Cephalometric Study of Profile Changes to Age 32 in Orthodontic "normals" [thesis]. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1973.
33. Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:177-190.
34. Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:90-102.