The Esthetic Impact of Extraction and Nonextraction Treatments on Caucasian Patients

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-10

  Bowman, S Jay ^a,c   Johnston, Lysle E ^b  

^a University of Michigan ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c Kalamazoo Orthodontics   (United States)

Author keywords

Extraction; Nonextraction; Soft tissue profile

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CAUCASIAN; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTIST; FACE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHILD; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SERIAL EXTRACTION;

EID: 0034136220     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989; 96:462-466.
2. O'Connor BMP. Contemporary trends in orthodontic practice: a national survey. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;103:163-170.
3. Little M, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97:393-404.
4. Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ, Yancey JM, Stewart AV, Scarfe WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:53-60.
5. Geran, RE. Long-term Stability of Rapid Maxillary Expansion in the Mixed Dentition [thesis]. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan; 1998.
6. Bowman SJ. One-stage versus two-stage treatment: are two really necessary? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;113:111-116.
7. Gianelly AA. One-phase versus two-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:556-559.
8. Gianelly AA. Crowding: timing of treatment. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:415-417.
9. Gianelly AA. Leeway space and the resolution of crowding in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:118-194.
10. Dugoni SA, Lee JS, Varela J, Dugoni AA. Early mixed dentition treatment: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:311-320.
11. Boley JC. Extraction versus nonextraction: has the pendulum swung too far? [Summary of presentation to the Southern Region, PCSO meeting June 1991, Los Angeles, Calif] PCSO Bulletin, 1991;63:58-59.
12. Boley JC. Face quiz study. Presented to the Southern Component of the Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists (June 14) and the national meeting of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists (August 14), 1991.
13. Boley JC. Face quiz study. Presented to the 92nd Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, St. Louis, Mo, (May 11), 1992.
14. Rossouw PE. A Longitudinal Study of the Stability of the Dentition Following Orthodontic Treatment [PhD dissertation]. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa, 1992.
15. Sandusky WC III. A Long-term Postretention Study of Tweed Extraction Treatment [thesis]. Memphis: University of Tennessee, 1983.
16. Franklin GS, Rossouw PE, Woodside DG. A longitudinal study of dental and skeletal parameters associated with stability of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108: 452-453.
17. Sadowsky C. The risk of orthodontic treatment for producing temporomandibular mandibular disorders: a literature overview. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101:79-83.
18. Luecke PE III, Johnston LE Jr. The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of "functional orthodontics." Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101:4-12.
19. McNamara JA Jr., Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9:73-90.
20. Management of temporomandibular disorders. NIH Technol Assess Statement. 1996; Apr 29-May 1;1-31.
21. Greene CS. Etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:222-228.
22. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:162-167.
23. Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;102:1-14.
24. Beattie JR, Paquette DE, Johnston LE Jr. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with "borderline," equally susceptible Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105:444-449.
25. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of premolar-extraction treatment: A long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:257-272.
26. Livieratos FA, Johnston LE Jr. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:118-131.
27. Johnston LE Jr. Growing jaws for fun and profit: A modest proposal. In: McNamara JA Jr, ed. What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Craniofacial Growth Series 35. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1998: 63-86.
28. Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthetic Dent. 1997;9:76-85.
29. Lines P, Lines R, Lines C. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:648-657.
30. Prahl-Anderson B, Boersma H, van der Linden FPGM, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;98:209-212.
31. Kerr WJS, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1990;17:299-304.
32. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jacobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes to Class II Division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995; 107:28-37.
33. Young T, Smith R. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: A comparison of change during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;103: 452-458.
34. Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod. 1994;64: 31-42.
35. Scott SH, Johnston LE Jr. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999;116:352-8.
36. Drobocky OB, Smith, RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989;95:220-230.
37. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures of chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17:45-56.
38. Winer BJ. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill 1971: 513-39.
39. Johnston LE Jr, Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Cassidy DW, McCray JF, Killiany DM. The reduction of susceptibility bias in retrospective comparisions of alternative treatment strategies. In: Vig KD, Vig PS, eds. Clinical Research as the Basis of Clinical Practice. Craniofacial Growth Series 25. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1991:155-177.
40. Hagler BL, Lupini J, Johnston LE Jr. Long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction alternatives in matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998; 114:393-403.
41. Martin JC. Racial ethnocentrism and judgment of beauty. J Soc Psychol. 1964;63:59-63.
42. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970;40:284-318.
43. Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans: an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;104:240-250.
44. Polk MS Jr, Farman AG, Yancy JA, Gholston LR, Johnson BE. Soft tissue profile: a survey of African-American preference. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:90-101.
45. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:175-183.
46. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preferences. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:67-73.
47. Dunlevy HA, White RP, Proffit WR, Turvey TA. Professional and lay judgment of facial esthetic changes following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 1974;2:151-158.
48. Spadafore CA. Long-term Esthetic Impact of Class II, Division 1 Treatments in "Borderline" Samples [thesis]. St. Louis, Mo: Saint Louis University, 1995.
49. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:105-126.
50. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;112:639-644.
51. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:164-168.
52. Oynick, CA. The Impact of Orthodontic Treatment on Perceived Facial Esthetics [thesis]. St Louis, Mo: St. Louis University, 1988.
53. Witzig JW, Spahl TJ. The Clinical Management of Basic Maxillofacial Orthopedic Appliances. Vol. 1, Mechanics. Littleton, Mass: PSG Publishing, 1987:10-13.
54. Stoner CC. An interview: AAFO's man of the year 1984, Dr. John W. Witzig. Funct Orthod. 1984;1:9-15.
55. Broadbent JM. Facing malocclusion: achieving harmony and balance. Dent Today. 1990;9:41-45.
56. Bowbeer GRN. Saving the face and the TMJ, part 2. Funct Orthod. 1986;3:9-24.
57. Gianelly AA. Extraction Versus Nonextraction. In: Bolender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y, eds. Extraction versus nonextraction. Paris: SID Publisher, 1995:174-184.
58. McNamara JA Jr, Brust EW, Riolo M. Soft tissue evaluation of individuals with an ideal occlusion and a well-balanced face. In: McNamara JA Jr, ed. Esthetics and the Treatment of Facial Form. Craniofacial Growth Series 28. Ann Arbor Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1993: 115-146.
59. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment Semin Orthod. 1995;1:67-81.
60. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:698-706.
61. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the laws of lip relation. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:272-289.
62. Bowman SJ. More than lip service: facial esthetics in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130:1173-1181.
63. James RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:265-276.