Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 88-92

  Zange, Sabrina Elisa ^a   Ramos, Adilson Luiz ^b   Cuoghi, Osmar Aparecido ^b   Mendonça, Marcos Rogério De ^b   Suguino, Rosely ^b  

^a Maringa University Center ^*

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Buccal corridor; Esthetics

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHEEK; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DENTAL CARE; FACIAL BONE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PERCEPTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SYNDROME; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHEEK; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; SEX FACTORS; SMILING; SYNDROME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 78649560257     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/031210-145.1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1970; 57:132-144.
2. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Quian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:208-213.
3. Frush JP, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:558-581.
4. Ackermann MB. Buccal smile corridors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:528-529.
5. Capelozza Filho L. Diagnóstico em Ortodontia. Maringá , Brazil: Dental Press Editorial; 2004.
6. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:162-167.
7. Kim E, Gianelly AA. Extraction versus nonextraction: arch width and smile esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:354-358.
8. Ritter DE, Gandini LG Jr, Pinto AS, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod. 2005;76:198-203.
9. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arch and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2005;76:557-563.
10. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:343-350.
11. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Rosenstiel S. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2007;10:15-21.
12. Maulik C, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:307-315.
13. Valiathan A. Buccal corridor space, arch form, and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:557.
14. Shaw W, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:21-26.
15. Phillips C, Trentini CJ, Douvartzidis N. The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:590-594.
16. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311-324.
17. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:141-151.