Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 953-958

  Mejia Maidl, Martha ^a   Evans, Carla A ^b   Viana, Grace ^b   Anderson, Nina K ^a   Giddon, Donald B ^c  

^a University of Illinois ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer imaging; Esthetics; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144452773     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Giddon DB. Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:82-93.
2. Wells KB, Golding JM, Hough RL, Burnam A, Karno M. Factors affecting the probability of use of general and medical health and social/community services for Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Med Care. 1988;26:441-452.
3. Moss JP. The use of three-dimensional techniques in facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:94-104.
4. Marcell AV. Understanding ethnicity, identity formation and risk behavior among adolescents of Mexican descent. J Sch Health. 1994;64:323-327.
5. Jones D, Hill K. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum Nat. 1993;4:271-296.
6. Martin JG. Racial ethnocentrism and judgment of beauty. J Soc Psychol. 1964;63:59-63.
7. Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans - an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1993;104:240-250.
8. Peck HP, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970;40:284-318.
9. Garcia CJ. Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Downs and Steiner analysis. Am J Orthod.1975;68:67-74.
10. Phinney JS. When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? Am Psychol. 1996;51:918-927.
11. Marin G, Gamba RJ. A new measurement of acculturation for Hispanics: the bidimensional acculturation scale for Hispanics (BAS). Hispanic J Behav Sci. 1996;18:297-316.
12. Gurin P, Hurtado A, Peng T. Group contacts and ethnicity in the social identities of Mexicanos and Chicanos. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1994;20:521-532.
13. Giddon DB, Sconzo R, Kinchen JA, Evans CA. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:441-448.
14. Giddon DB, Bernier DL, Kinchen KA, Evans CA. Comparison of two computer-animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference. Percept Mot Skills.1996;82:1251-1264.
15. Arpino V, Giddon DB, BeGole EA, Evans CA. Presurgical profile preferences of patients and clinicians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:631-637.
16. Hier LA, Evans CA, BeGole EA, Giddon DB. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:231-238.
17. Kitay D, BeGole EA, Evans CA, Giddon DB. Computer-animated comparison of self perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:125-134.
18. Giddon DB, Rains CE, Evans CA, Clemens IK. Influence of magnitude of horizontal and vertical deformation on preference for morphed faces. Percept Mot Skills.1997;85:1303-1313.
19. Thai TN, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Stimulus variables affecting perception of morphing faces [IADR Abstracts]. J Dent Res. 2000;79:501.
20. Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:34-39.
21. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1993;104:180-187.
22. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:272-289.
23. Burcal RG, Laskin DM, Sperry TP. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:666-670.
24. Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernick J. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:175-182.