Assessment of facial profile changes in patients treated with maxillary premolar extractions

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 131-137

  Almeida Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues de ^a   Guimarães, Luciane Brigueli Marrone ^c   Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues de ^b   Almeida, Renato Rodrigues de ^b   Ferreira, Fernando Pedrin Carvalho ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NORTE DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c USP ^*

Author keywords

Angle class II malocclusion; Corrective orthodontics; Perception; Tooth extraction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872858177     PISSN: 21769451     EISSN: 21776709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512012000500018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Almeida-Pedrin RR, Pinzan A, Almeida RR, Almeida MR, Henriques JFC. Efeitos do AEB conjugado e do Bionator no tratamento da Classe II, 1a divisão. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2005 Out;10(5):37-54.
2. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: Assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Dec;112(6):639-44.
3. Boley JC, Pontier JP, Smith S, Fulbright M. Facial changes in extration and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod. 1998 Dec;68(6):539-46.
4. Bowman SJ, Johnston LE Jr. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasion patients. Angle Orthod. 2000 Feb;70(1):3-10.
5. Scott Conley R, Jernigan C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy. Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):59-65.
6. Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1973 Jan;43(1):34-40.
7. Freitas MR, Freitas DS, Pinheiro FHSL, Freitas KMS. Prevalência das más oclusões em pacientes inscritos para tratamento ortodôntico na Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru-USP. Rev Fac Odont Bauru. 2002;10(3):164-9.
8. Hall D, Taylor RW, Jacobson A, Sadowsky PL, Bartolucci A. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and lay public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Nov;118(5):514-25.
9. Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985 Nov;88(5):402-8.
10. Kerr WJS, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Brit J Orthod. 1990 Nov;17(4):299-304.
11. Knight H, Keith O. Ranking facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):340-8.
12. Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jul;122(1):67-72.
13. McKoy-White J, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jan;129(1):17-23.
14. Mejia-Maidl M, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):953-8.
15. Okuyama CC. Preferência do perfil facial tegumentar, em jovens leucodermas, melanodermas e xantodermas de ambos os sexos, avaliados por ortodontistas, leigos e artistas plásticos [Dissertação]. Bauru (SP): Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru; 1995. 94 p
16. O'Neill K, Harkness M, Knight R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Oct;118(4):371-6; discussion 377.
17. Orsini MG, Huang GJ, Kiyak HA, Ramsay DS, Bollen AM, Anderson NK, et al. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):283-91.
18. Reis ASB, Abrão J, Capelozza Filho L, Claro CAA. Análise facial subjetiva. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2006 Set-Out;11(5):159-72.
19. Schlosser JB, Preston CB, Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jan;127(1):17-24.
20. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod. 1984 Jul;86(1):67-73.
21. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Aug;128(2):201-5.
22. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):464-71.
23. Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG, Alexander RG, Buschang PH. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):450-7.
24. Tadic N, Woods MG. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep;77(5):808-16.
25. Türkkahraman H, Gökalp H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of turkish population. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):640-7.