Long-Term Profile Changes Associated with Successfully Treated Extraction and Nonextraction Class II Division 1 Malocclusions

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 208-219

  Zierhut, Eileen C ^a,b   Joondeph, Donald R ^a   Artun, Jon ^a   Little, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Extraction; Nonextraction; Post retention; Post treatment; Soft tissue profile

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTICS; RECURRENT DISEASE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RECURRENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034199250     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lieberman MA, Gazit E. Facial profile as affected by extraction or non-extraction decisions. Quintessence Int. 1982;13:447-454.
2. Finnoy JP, Wisth PJ, Boe OE. Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:68-78.
3. Looi LK, Mills JR. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:507-517.
4. Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:1-14.
5. Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:220-230.
6. Young TM, Smith RJ. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103: 452-458.
7. Bloom LA. Perioral profile changes in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1961;47:371-379.
8. Rudee DA. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:421-434.
9. Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients. Am J Orthod. 1972;61: 45-54.
10. Wisth PJ. Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction in boys. Br J Orthod. 1973;1:199-204.
11. Anderson JP, Joondeph DR, Turpin DL. A cephalometric study of profile changes in orthodontically treated cases ten years out of retention. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:324-336.
12. Angelle PL. A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1973;267-280.
13. Roos N. Soft-tissue profile changes in class II treatment. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:165-175.
14. Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:385-394.
15. Pelton WJ, Elsasser WS. Studies of dentofacial morphology, IV. Profile changes among 6,829 white individuals according to age and sex. Angle Orthod. 1955;25:199-207.
16. Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod. 1959;45:481-507.
17. Beget BC. A Cephalometric Study of Profile Changes to Age 32 in Orthodontic "normals" [thesis]. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1973.
18. Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:177-190.
19. Wisth PJ. Changes of the soft tissue profile during growth. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1972;123-131.
20. Koch R, Gonzales A, Witt E. Profile and soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1979;1:193-199.
21. Fidler BC, Årtun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:276-285.
22. Elmajian KE. A Serial Study of Facial Growth as Related to Cranial Base Morphology [thesis]. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1959.
23. Doppel DM, Damon WM, Joondeph DR, Little RM. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:161-168.
24. Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42(suppl 1):400411.
25. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. New York, NY: Interscience Publications; 1940.
26. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod. 1957;27:14-37.
27. Hambleton RS. The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:405-419.
28. Forsberg CM, Odenrick L. Changes in the relationship between the lips and the aesthetic line from eight years of age to adulthood. Eur J Orthod. 1979;1:265-270.
29. Bishara SE, Hession TJ, Peterson LC. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88:209-223.
30. Sarnäs KV, Solow B. Early adult changes in the skeletal and soft-tissue profile. Eur J Orthod. 1980;2:1-12.
31. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning, Part 1. Am J Orthod. 1983;84: 1-28.