Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 129, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 672-677

  Xu, Tian Min ^a   Liu, Yan ^a   Yang, Min Zhi ^a   Huang, Wei ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL OF STOMATOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHINA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTIST; FACE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHINA; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646187761     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Owens E.G., Goodacre C.J., Loh P.L., Hanke G., Okamura M., Jo K.H., et al. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: a comparison of extraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002) 273-282
2. Hall D., Taylor R.W., Jacobson A., Sadowsky P.L., and Bartolucci A. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 514-525
3. Farrow A.L., Zarrinnia K., and Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans-an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 240-250
4. Martin J.G. Racial ethnocentrism and judgment of beauty. J Soc Psychol 63 (1964) 59-63
5. Udry J.R. Structural correlates of feminine beauty preferences in Britain and the United States. a comparison. [abstract]. Sociol Soc Res 49 (1965) 330
6. Ford C.S., Prothro E.T., and Child I.L. Some transcultural comparisons of esthetic judgment. J Soc Psychol 68 (1966) 19-26
7. Child I.L., and Iwao S. Personality and esthetic sensitivity. extension of findings to younger age and different culture. J Pers Soc Psychol 8 (1968) 308-312
8. Sutter Jr. R.E., and Turley P.K. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles. Angle Orthod 68 (1998) 487-496
9. Miyajima K., McNamara Jr. J.A., Kimura T., Murata S., and Iizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110 (1996) 431-438
10. Lew K.K., Ho K.K., Keng S.B., and Ho K.H. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 (1992) 1184-1190
11. Hashim H.A., and AlBarakati S.F. Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups. a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 4 (2003) 60-73
12. Sim R.S., Smith J.D., and Chan A.S. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2 (2000) 113-120
13. Baumrind S., Korn E.L., Boyd R.L., and Maxwell R. The decision to extract. part 1-interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109 (1996) 297-309
14. Carey C.W. Diagnosis and case analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 38 (1951) 149-161
15. Luppanapornlarp S., and Johnston Jr. L.E. The effects of premolar extraction. a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 63 (1993) 257-272
16. Paquette D.E., Beattie J.R., and Johnston Jr. L.E. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102 (1992) 1-14
17. Bramante M.A. Controversies in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 34 (1990) 91-102
18. Brook P.H., and Shaw W.C. The development of an index for orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 11 (1989) 309-332
19. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Jones R., Stephens C.D., et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating). reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 125-139
20. DeGuzman L., Bahiraei D., Vig K.W.L., Vig P.S., Weyant R.J., and O'Brien K. The validation of the peer assessment rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 172-176
21. Hamdan A.M., and Rock W.P. An appraisal of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index and a suggested new weighting system. Eur J Orthod 21 (1999) 181-192